| Literature DB >> 27998291 |
Xingce Wang1, Enhui Liu1, Zhongke Wu2, Feifei Zhai3, Yi-Cheng Zhu3, Wuyang Shui1, Mingquan Zhou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular disease is the most common cause of death worldwide, with millions of deaths annually. Interest is increasing toward understanding the geometric factors that influence cerebrovascular diseases, such as stroke. Cerebrovascular shape analyses are essential for the diagnosis and pathological identification of these conditions. The current study aimed to provide a stable and consistent methodology for quantitative Circle of Willis (CoW) analysis and to identify geometric changes in this structure.Entities:
Keywords: B-spline curve; Circle of Willis; Geometric factors; Quantitative analysis; Skeleton; Stochastic analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27998291 PMCID: PMC5168872 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0170-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the Circle of Willis. Image courtesy of wikipedia.org
Fig. 2Pipeline for geometric CoW characterization
Fig. 3Computing the corresponding radius of vessel method
Fig. 4Angle comprising the vectors and
Fig. 5Pipeline results at different stages. a Maximum intensity project image. b Volume rendering result. c Cerebrovascular segmentation result. d Mesh reconstruction of the vessel. e CoW segmentation result with volume data. f B-spline curve of the COW skeleton and the corresponding radii of the sample data
Fig. 6Consistency between the initial skeleton data and the B-spline skeleton data. a Initial skeletal topology. b B-spline skeleton topology. c Matching of the initial skeleton topology and B-spline skeleton topology. d Line image of the discrete data points on the initial skeleton of PCAr. e Line image of 20 sampling points on the B-spline skeleton of PCAr. f Matching of discrete data points from the initial skeleton and 20 sampling points on the B-spline skeleton of PCAr
Difference between the B-spline skeleton and initial skeleton of each vessel in the CoW
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACo | ACAl | ACAr | ICAl | ICAr | PCol | PCor | PCAl | PCAr | BA | |
| Sum | 1.14 | 0.63 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 1.28 | 1.31 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 0.06 | 0.49 |
| Mean | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Variance | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
The length of each individual vessel from the No. 47 CoW dataset
| ACo | ACAl | ACAr | ICAl | ICAr | PCol | PCor | PCAl | PCAr | BA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 2.62 | 23.47 | 25.11 | 7.05 | 17.21 | 17.18 | 12.82 | 12.06 | 10.31 | 24.10 |
Mean curvature and variance for all sampling points of each individual vessel from the No. 47 CoW dataset
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACo | ACAl | ACAr | ICAl | ICAr | PCol | PCor | PCAl | PCAr | BA | |
| Mean | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.27 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.30 |
| Variance | 0.05 | 1.26 | 1.17 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 0.52 | 0.13 | 1.40 | 0.32 | 0.11 |
Mean torsion and variance for all sampling points of each individual vessel from the No. 47 CoW dataset
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACo | ACAl | ACAr | ICAl | ICAr | PCol | PCor | PCAl | PCAr | BA | |
| Mean | −1.20 | −0.08 | −1.41 | −0.13 | −0.02 | 0.82 | −0.13 | −2.36 | −0.30 | 0.41 |
| Variance | 11.02 | 0.60 | 50.23 | 6.75 | 0.04 | 8.22 | 1.67 | 48.72 | 4.59 | 31.21 |
Mean radii and variance for all sampling points of each individual vessel from the No. 47 CoW dataset
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACo | ACAl | ACAr | ICAl | ICAr | PCol | PCor | PCAl | PCAr | BA | |
| Mean | 2.48 | 1.50 | 2.49 | 3.08 | 1.65 | 1.79 | 1.63 | 2.42 | 2.62 | 2.82 |
| Variance | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.67 |
Mean included angles and variance for all sampling points of every individual vessel from the No. 47 CoW data set
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACo | ACAl | ACAr | ICAl | ICAr | PCol | PCor | PCAl | PCAr | BA | |
| Mean | 2.89 | 2.15 | 2.27 | 2.82 | 2.27 | 2.25 | 2.44 | 2.60 | 2.24 | 2.53 |
| Variance | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.04 |
Fig. 7Parameters calculated using the current method in the sample No. 47 CoW dataset base on the following TOF MRA data: size of 448 ×448×128 and a resolution of 0.5 ×0.5× 0.8 m m 3. a Distribution of the sampling point curvature values on the individual vessels. b Distribution of the sampling point torsion values on the individual vessels. c Distribution of the sampling point radius values on the individual vessels. d Distribution of the sampling point angle values on the individual vessels
Fig. 8Parameters distributions for the symmetrical vessels in the CoW. a Distribution of sampling point radius values for the PCAl and PCAr. b Distribution of sampling point angle values for the PCol and PCor