RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Malignancy provokes regional changes to vessel shape. Characteristic vessel tortuosity abnormalities appear early during tumor development, affect initially healthy vessels, spread beyond the confines of tumor margins, and do not simply mirror tissue perfusion. The ability to detect and quantify tortuosity abnormalities on high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images offers a new approach to the noninvasive diagnosis of malignancy. This report evaluates a computerized, statistical method of analyzing the shapes of vessels extracted from MRA in diagnosing cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The regional vasculature of 34 healthy subjects was compared with the tumor-associated vasculature of 30 brain tumors before surgical resection. The operator performing the analysis was blinded to the diagnosis. Vessels were segmented from an MRA of each subject, a region of interest was defined in each tumor patient and was mapped to all healthy controls, and a statistical analysis of vessel shape measures was then performed over the region of interest. Many difficult cases were included, such as pinpoint, hemorrhagic, and irradiated tumors, as were hypervascular benign tumors. Tumors were identified as benign or malignant on the basis of histological evaluation. RESULTS: A discriminant analysis performed at the study's conclusion successfully classified all but one of the 30 tumors as benign or malignant on the basis of vessel tortuosity. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative, statistical measures of vessel shape offer a new approach to the diagnosis and staging of disease. Although the methods developed under the current report must be tested against a new series of cases, initial results are promising.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:Malignancy provokes regional changes to vessel shape. Characteristic vessel tortuosity abnormalities appear early during tumor development, affect initially healthy vessels, spread beyond the confines of tumor margins, and do not simply mirror tissue perfusion. The ability to detect and quantify tortuosity abnormalities on high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images offers a new approach to the noninvasive diagnosis of malignancy. This report evaluates a computerized, statistical method of analyzing the shapes of vessels extracted from MRA in diagnosing cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The regional vasculature of 34 healthy subjects was compared with the tumor-associated vasculature of 30 brain tumors before surgical resection. The operator performing the analysis was blinded to the diagnosis. Vessels were segmented from an MRA of each subject, a region of interest was defined in each tumorpatient and was mapped to all healthy controls, and a statistical analysis of vessel shape measures was then performed over the region of interest. Many difficult cases were included, such as pinpoint, hemorrhagic, and irradiated tumors, as were hypervascular benign tumors. Tumors were identified as benign or malignant on the basis of histological evaluation. RESULTS: A discriminant analysis performed at the study's conclusion successfully classified all but one of the 30 tumors as benign or malignant on the basis of vessel tortuosity. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative, statistical measures of vessel shape offer a new approach to the diagnosis and staging of disease. Although the methods developed under the current report must be tested against a new series of cases, initial results are promising.
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sarah E Shelton; Yueh Z Lee; Mike Lee; Emmanuel Cherin; F Stuart Foster; Stephen R Aylward; Paul A Dayton Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Ewelina Kluza; Jean-Paul J E Kleijnen; Milou H Martens; Dorit Rennspiess; Monique Maas; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Robert G Riedl; Axel zur Hausen; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Elizabeth Bullitt; Donglin Zeng; Benedicte Mortamet; Arpita Ghosh; Stephen R Aylward; Weili Lin; Bonita L Marks; Keith Smith Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: April F Eichler; Euiheon Chung; David P Kodack; Jay S Loeffler; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Hermann B Frieboes; John S Lowengrub; S Wise; X Zheng; Paul Macklin; Elaine L Bearer; Vittorio Cristini Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-03-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Elizabeth Bullitt; Nancy U Lin; J Keith Smith; Donglin Zeng; Eric P Winer; Lisa A Carey; Weili Lin; Matthew G Ewend Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 11.105