Literature DB >> 21345556

Biomechanical effects of insertion location and bone cement augmentation on the anchoring strength of iliac screw.

Bin-Sheng Yu1, Ze-Min Li, Zhi-Yu Zhou, Li-Wen Zeng, Li-Bing Wang, Zhao-Min Zheng, William Weijia Lu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iliac screw loosening has been a clinical problem in the lumbo-pelvic reconstruction. Although iliac screws are commonly inserted into either upper or lower iliac column, the biomechanical effects of the two fixations and their revision techniques with bone cement remain undetermined. The purpose of this study was to compare the anchoring strengths of the upper and lower iliac screws with and without cement augmentation.
METHODS: 5 pairs of formalin fixed cadaveric ilia with the bone mineral density values ranged from 0.82 to 0.97 g/cm(2) were adopted in this study. Using screws with 70-mm length and 7.5-mm diameter, 2 conventional iliac screw fixations and their revision techniques with cement augmentation were sequentially established and tested on the same ilium as follows: upper screw, upper cement screw, lower screw, and lower cement screw. Following 2000 cyclic compressive loading of -300 N to -100 N to the screw on a material testing machine, the maximum pull-out strengths were measured and analyzed.
FINDINGS: The average pull-out strengths of upper, upper cement, lower, and lower cement screws were 964 N, 1462 N, 1537 N, and 1964 N, respectively. The lower screw showed significantly higher pull-out strength than the upper one (P=0.008). The cement augmentation notably increased the pull-out strengths of both upper and lower screws. The positive correlation between pull-out strength and bone mineral density value was obtained for the 4 fixations.
INTERPRETATION: The lower iliac screw technique should be the preferred choice in lumbo-pelvic stabilization surgery; cement augmentation may serve as a useful salvage technique for iliac screw loosening; preoperative evaluation of bone quality is crucial for predicting fixation strength of iliac screw.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345556     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects.

Authors:  S Hoppe; M J B Keel
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Sacropelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity (ASD); a very high rate of mechanical failure.

Authors:  Umit Ozgur Guler; Engin Cetin; Onur Yaman; Ferran Pellise; Alba Villa Casademut; Montse Domingo Sabat; Ahmet Alanay; Francesco Sanchez Perez Grueso; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can prevention of a reherniation be investigated? Establishment of a herniation model and experiments with an anular closure device.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lena Ressel; Frank Heuer; Nicolas Graf; Stefan Rath
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.