Literature DB >> 27994169

Subfunctionalization of Paralogous Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors from the Frog Xenopus Laevis: Distinct Target Genes and Differential Responses to Specific Agonists in a Single Cell Type.

Scott H Freeburg1, Eric Engelbrecht2, Wade H Powell2.   

Abstract

Gene duplication confers genetic redundancy that can facilitate subfunctionalization, the partitioning of ancestral functions between paralogs. We capitalize on a recent genome duplication in Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) to interrogate possible functional differentiation between alloalleles of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates toxicity of dioxin-like compounds and plays a role in the physiology and development of the cardiovascular, hepatic, and immune systems in vertebrates. X. laevis has 2 AHR genes, AHR1α and AHR1β To test the hypothesis that the encoded proteins exhibit different molecular functions, we used TALENs in XLK-WG cells, generating mutant lines lacking functional versions of each AHR and measuring the transcriptional responsiveness of several target genes to the toxic xenobiotic 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and the candidate endogenous ligand 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ). Mutation of either AHR1α or AHR1β reduced TCDD induction of the canonical AHR target, Cytochrome P4501A6, by 75%, despite the much lower abundance of AHR1β in wild-type cells. More modestly induced target genes, encoding aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR), spectrin repeat-containing nuclear envelope protein 1 (SYNE-1), and gap junction protein gamma 1 (GJC1), were regulated solely by AHR1α. AHR1β was responsible for CYP1A6 induction by FICZ, while AHR1α mediated FICZ induction of AHRR We conclude that AHR1α and AHR1β have distinct transcriptional functions in response to specific agonists, even within a single cell type. Functional analysis of frog AHR paralogs advances the understanding of AHR evolution and as well as the use of frog models of developmental toxicology such as FETAX.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aryl; cell culture; environmental toxicology; evolution; gene expression/regulation; hydrocarbon; in vitro and alternatives.; non-mammalian species; receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27994169      PMCID: PMC5291211          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  55 in total

Review 1.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: terminating erroneous gene expression.

Authors:  Kristian E Baker; Roy Parker
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.382

3.  Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Jeffrey C Miller; Ya-Li Lee; Christian M Beausejour; Jeremy M Rock; Sheldon Augustus; Andrew C Jamieson; Matthew H Porteus; Philip D Gregory; Michael C Holmes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The transcriptional signature of dioxin in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  A Puga; A Maier; M Medvedovic
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Molecular evolution of two vertebrate aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptors (AHR1 and AHR2) and the PAS family.

Authors:  M E Hahn; S I Karchner; M A Shapiro; S A Perera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of African clawed frogs: phylogeography and implications for polyploid evolution.

Authors:  Ben J Evans; Darcy B Kelley; Richard C Tinsley; Don J Melnick; David C Cannatella
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Repression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling by AHR repressor: role of DNA binding and competition for AHR nuclear translocator.

Authors:  Brad R Evans; Sibel I Karchner; Lenka L Allan; Richard S Pollenz; Robert L Tanguay; Matthew J Jenny; David H Sherr; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Camila Odio; Sarah A Holzman; Michael S Denison; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Laura Bonati; Diana G Franks; Mark E Hahn; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Functional characterization and evolutionary history of two aryl hydrocarbon receptor isoforms (AhR1 and AhR2) from avian species.

Authors:  Tomoko Yasui; Eun-Young Kim; Hisato Iwata; Diana G Franks; Sibel I Karchner; Mark E Hahn; Shinsuke Tanabe
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Identification of functional domains of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  B N Fukunaga; M R Probst; S Reisz-Porszasz; O Hankinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dioxin Exposure Alters Molecular and Morphological Responses to Thyroid Hormone in Xenopus laevis Cultured Cells and Prometamorphic Tadpoles.

Authors:  Justin D Taft; Megan M Colonnetta; Rachel E Schafer; Natalie Plick; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Diversity as Opportunity: Insights from 600 Million Years of AHR Evolution.

Authors:  Mark E Hahn; Sibel I Karchner; Rebeka R Merson
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-16

3.  Dioxin Disrupts Thyroid Hormone and Glucocorticoid Induction of klf9, a Master Regulator of Frog Metamorphosis.

Authors:  David T Han; Weichen Zhao; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.109

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.