Literature DB >> 23394719

Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.

Camila Odio1, Sarah A Holzman, Michael S Denison, Domenico Fraccalvieri, Laura Bonati, Diana G Franks, Mark E Hahn, Wade H Powell.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) family protein that mediates the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in vertebrates. Frogs are remarkably insensitive to TCDD, and AHRs from Xenopus laevis bind TCDD with low affinity. We sought to identify structural features of X. laevis AHR1β associated with low TCDD sensitivity. Substitution of the entire ligand binding domain (LBD) with the corresponding sequence from mouse AHR(b-1) dramatically increased TCDD responsiveness in transactivation assays. To identify the amino acid residues responsible, we constructed a comparative model of the AHR1β LBD using homologous domains of PAS proteins HIF2α and ARNT. The model revealed an internal cavity with dimensions similar to those of the putative binding cavity of mouse AHR(b-1), suggesting the importance of side chain interactions over cavity size. Of residues with side chains clearly pointing into the cavity, only two differed from the mouse sequence. When A354, located within a conserved β-strand, was changed to serine, the corresponding mouse residue, the EC50 for TCDD decreased more than 15-fold. When N325 was changed to serine, the EC50 decreased 3-fold. When the mutations were combined, the EC50 decreased from 18.6 to 0.8 nM, the value nearly matching the TCDD sensitivity of mouse AHR. Velocity sedimentation analysis confirmed that mutant frog AHRs exhibited correspondingly increased levels of TCDD binding. We also assayed mutant AHRs for responsiveness to a candidate endogenous ligand, 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ). Mutations that increased sensitivity to TCDD also increased sensitivity to FICZ. This comparative study represents a novel approach to discerning fundamental information about the structure of AHR and its interactions with biologically important agonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23394719      PMCID: PMC3669666          DOI: 10.1021/bi301722k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  42 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Continuum secondary structure captures protein flexibility.

Authors:  Claus A F Andersen; Arthur G Palmer; Søren Brunak; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  A dynamic role for the Ah receptor in cell signaling? Insights from a diverse group of Ah receptor interacting proteins.

Authors:  David B Carlson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Cloning and characterization of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  R L Tanguay; C C Abnet; W Heideman; R E Peterson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-01-18

5.  Amino acid sequence of the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 predicts sensitivity of wild birds to effects of dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Reza Farmahin; Gillian E Manning; Doug Crump; Dongmei Wu; Lukas J Mundy; Stephanie P Jones; Mark E Hahn; Sibel I Karchner; John P Giesy; Steven J Bursian; Matthew J Zwiernik; Timothy B Fredricks; Sean W Kennedy
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Protein kinase C activity is required for aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway-mediated signal transduction.

Authors:  W P Long; M Pray-Grant; J C Tsai; G H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  The transcriptional signature of dioxin in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  A Puga; A Maier; M Medvedovic
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Modeling of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain and its utility in virtual ligand screening to predict new AhR ligands.

Authors:  William H Bisson; Daniel C Koch; Edmond F O'Donnell; Sammy M Khalil; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Robert L Tanguay; Ruben Abagyan; Siva Kumar Kolluri
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Key amino acids in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor predict dioxin sensitivity in avian species.

Authors:  Jessica A Head; Mark E Hahn; Sean W Kennedy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Identification of functional domains of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  B N Fukunaga; M R Probst; S Reisz-Porszasz; O Hankinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  9 in total

1.  An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor from the Salamander Ambystoma mexicanum Exhibits Low Sensitivity to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  Jenny Shoots; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Diana G Franks; Michael S Denison; Mark E Hahn; Laura Bonati; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Characterization of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Pathway in Anabas testudineus and Mechanistic Exploration of the Reduced Sensitivity of AhR2a.

Authors:  Wanglong Zhang; Heidi Qunhui Xie; Yunping Li; Xianghui Zou; Li Xu; Dan Ma; Jiao Li; Yongchao Ma; Tao Jin; Mark E Hahn; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Dioxin Exposure Alters Molecular and Morphological Responses to Thyroid Hormone in Xenopus laevis Cultured Cells and Prometamorphic Tadpoles.

Authors:  Justin D Taft; Megan M Colonnetta; Rachel E Schafer; Natalie Plick; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Molecular modeling of the AhR structure and interactions can shed light on ligand-dependent activation and transformation mechanisms.

Authors:  Laura Bonati; Dario Corrada; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Stefano Motta
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Subfunctionalization of Paralogous Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors from the Frog Xenopus Laevis: Distinct Target Genes and Differential Responses to Specific Agonists in a Single Cell Type.

Authors:  Scott H Freeburg; Eric Engelbrecht; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  An aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the caecilian Gymnopis multiplicata suggests low dioxin affinity in the ancestor of all three amphibian orders.

Authors:  Sarah A Kazzaz; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Diana G Franks; Michael S Denison; Mark E Hahn; Laura Bonati; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.822

7.  Access Path to the Ligand Binding Pocket May Play a Role in Xenobiotics Selection by AhR.

Authors:  Dániel Szöllősi; Áron Erdei; Gergely Gyimesi; Csaba Magyar; Tamás Hegedűs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Naphthoquinone-Dependent Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.

Authors:  Samantha C Faber; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Laura Bonati; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Species-Specific Differences in Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Responses: How and Why?

Authors:  Xiaoting Xu; Xi Zhang; Yuzhu Yuan; Yongrui Zhao; Hamza M Fares; Mengjiao Yang; Qing Wen; Reham Taha; Lixin Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.