Sachin P Gadani1,2,3,4, Igor Smirnov5,2, Ashtyn T Smith5,2,3, Christopher C Overall5,2, Jonathan Kipnis1,2,3,4. 1. Center for Brain Immunology and Glia (BIG), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 sg8th@virginia.edu kipnis@virginia.edu. 2. Department of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908. 3. Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908. 4. Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908. 5. Center for Brain Immunology and Glia (BIG), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
Abstract
The meningeal space is occupied by a diverse repertoire of immune cells. Central nervous system (CNS) injury elicits a rapid immune response that affects neuronal survival and recovery, but the role of meningeal inflammation remains poorly understood. Here, we describe type 2 innate lymphocytes (ILC2s) as a novel cell type resident in the healthy meninges that are activated after CNS injury. ILC2s are present throughout the naive mouse meninges, though are concentrated around the dural sinuses, and have a unique transcriptional profile. After spinal cord injury (SCI), meningeal ILC2s are activated in an IL-33-dependent manner, producing type 2 cytokines. Using RNAseq, we characterized the gene programs that underlie the ILC2 activation state. Finally, addition of wild-type lung-derived ILC2s into the meningeal space of IL-33R-/- animals partially improves recovery after SCI. These data characterize ILC2s as a novel meningeal cell type that responds to SCI and could lead to new therapeutic insights for neuroinflammatory conditions.
The meningeal space is occupied by a diverse repertoire of immune cells. Central nervous system (CNS) injury elicits a rapid immune response that affects neuronal survival and recovery, but the role of meningeal inflammation remains poorly understood. Here, we describe type 2 innate lymphocytes (ILC2s) as a novel cell type resident in the healthy meninges that are activated after CNS injury. ILC2s are present throughout the naive mouse meninges, though are concentrated around the dural sinuses, and have a unique transcriptional profile. After spinal cord injury (SCI), meningeal ILC2s are activated in an IL-33-dependent manner, producing type 2 cytokines. Using RNAseq, we characterized the gene programs that underlie the ILC2 activation state. Finally, addition of wild-type lung-derived ILC2s into the meningeal space of IL-33R-/- animals partially improves recovery after SCI. These data characterize ILC2s as a novel meningeal cell type that responds to SCI and could lead to new therapeutic insights for neuroinflammatory conditions.
The healthy central nervous system (CNS) parenchyma is void of resident immune cells
besides microglia. However, there is a full repertoire of resident immune cells,
including macrophages, T cells, and B cells, in the meningeal spaces. Meningeal
leukocytes support normal brain function (Derecki
et al., 2010; Filiano et al.,
2016), can drain to local lymph nodes (Louveau et al., 2015), and present autoantigens in the context of
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE; Kivisäkk et al., 2009), but their activation and role after CNS
injury are poorly understood.Injury to the CNS is devastating and often results in profound impairment caused by
lack of regeneration and secondary neuronal death, the progressive loss of neurons
not injured by the primary insult (Dusart and
Schwab, 1994). A prominent feature of CNS injury is the immune response
that starts rapidly and has distinct beneficial effects on outcome, largely through
its effect on secondary neuronal damage (Shechter
et al., 2009; Gadani et al.,
2015a). The inflammatory cascade begins with release of alarm signals
(alarmins) that initiate a cellular response. We have previously characterized the
protein IL-33 as a key CNS alarmin that is expressed in healthy glia, is released
after injury, and promotes monocyte recruitment (Gadani et al., 2015b).Interestingly, IL-33 is released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after spinal cord
injury (SCI; Gadani et al., 2015b), leading
to the possibility of it activating meningeal cells there. Type 2 innate lymphocytes
(ILC2s) are recently described tissue-resident cells (Moro et al., 2010; Neill et
al., 2010; Price et al., 2010;
Molofsky et al., 2013) and are among
the most potent responders to IL-33 in the periphery. Upon interaction with IL-33,
ILC2s rapidly produce cytokines such as IL-13 and IL-5, initiating and potentiating
type 2 immunity (Van Dyken et al., 2014).
In the periphery, ILC2s are important mediators of antihelminth and allergic
inflammation (Halim, 2016) and promote
healing in skin (Rak et al., 2016) and lung
(Monticelli et al., 2011) injury
models. ILC2s have previously been detected in the CNS, where they are responsible
for gender differences in the EAE response of male and female Kit
mutant mice (Russi et al., 2015), but their
presence in the meninges and response to CNS injury has not been studied.Here, we identify ILC2s as a novel meninges-resident cell type and characterize their
localization, transcriptional profile, and response to CNS injury. Meningeal ILC2s
are concentrated around the dural sinuses and have unique transcriptional profiles
and basal activation states when compared with peripheral (lung) ILC2s. Meningeal
ILC2s are activated in an IL-33–dependent manner after CNS injury. Finally,
addition of WT lung-derived ILC2s into CSF of IL-33R−/−
mice before injury improves functional outcome and reduces lesion size after SCI,
suggesting that these cells play a beneficial post–CNS injury role.
Results and discussion
The meningeal compartment of the CNS hosts a wide variety of immune cells under
homeostatic conditions. ILC2s, known for their important functions in barrier
tissues, had previously been implicated in CNS diseases (Besnard et al., 2015; Russi
et al., 2015), but their presence in healthy meninges has not been
assessed. We asked whether ILC2s are present in healthy meninges and surprisingly
identified a population of
CD45+/Lineage−/Thy1.2+/ST2+
cells (Fig. 1 A). Furthermore, this
population had a surface marker profile characteristic of ILC2s, expressing C-kit,
Sca1, CD25, and IL-7Rα (Fig. 1 B).
Interestingly, the meninges has more ILC2s relative to ILC3s
(CD45+/singlets/lineage−/viable/RORγ+
cells) in the healthy state, and both ILC populations were concentrated in the brain
rather than spinal cord meninges (Fig. 1 C).
No ILCs were detected in the healthy spinal cord parenchyma (Fig. 1 C).
Figure 1.
ILC2s are meningeal-resident cells concentrated around the dural
sinus. (A) Representative gating of meningeal ILC2s. ILC2s were
identified by flow cytometry as
CD45+/singlets/lineage−/viable/ST2+/CD25+
cells (Lineage cocktail = CD11b, GR1, CD3, B220, FcεRα, Ter-119;
representative of three biological replicates). (B) Flow cytometry
characterization of meningeal ILC2s (representative of three biological
replicates). (C) Counts of mouse ILC2s and ILC3s
(CD45+/singlets/lineage−/viable/RORγt+
cells) in healthy mouse brain meninges (P = 0.007; left y axis), spinal
meninges (P = 0.015), and spinal cord parenchyma (P = 0.002; right y axis;
n = 3; multiple Student’s t
tests). (D–G) Characterization of the IL-13tdt mouse by
flow cytometry. (D) Representative flow plots of ILC2 tdTomato expression.
Lineage cocktail omitted anti-FcεRα in D and F to allow separate
visualization. (E) >95% of ILC2s are tdTomato+ in
IL-13tdt mouse brain and spinal cord meninges and lung
(n = 3; representative of three experiments). (F)
Representative flow plots of tdTomato expression of other meningeal cell
types. (G) ILC2s, T cells, and mast cells account for the majority of total
tdTomato+ cells in brain and spinal cord meninges and lung
(n = 3; representative of two experiments).
(H–J) Representative images of ILC2s identified as
IL-13tdt+/CD3−/toluidine
blue− cells in dural sinus (H), dura/arachnoid mater
(I), or spinal cord meninges (J) whole mounts (blue arrows represent
IL-13tdt+/CD3−/toluidine
blue− ILC2s, green arrows represent
IL-13tdt+ or −/CD3−/toluidine
blue− T cells, and yellow arrows represent
IL-13tdt+/CD3−/toluidine blue+
mast cells). (K) Quantification of ILC2 localization demonstrates a
concentration in the dural sinus versus other meninges areas (P < 0.0001;
n = 3–4; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s
multiple comparisons test). (L–N) Mice were treated with IL-33 every
other day for 6 d i.p., and on the eighth day, ILC2 numbers were analyzed by
flow cytometry. (L) Representative plots demonstrating expansion of ILC2s in
IL-33–treated mice relative to PBS treatment (gated on
live/CD45+/singlet/Lineage− cells). (M and
N) Counts demonstrating expansion in brain meninges (M; P = 0.009) and
spinal cord meninges (N; P = 0.001; n = 3, representative
of three experiments; Student’s t test). Error bars
represent mean ± SEM; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.
ILC2s are meningeal-resident cells concentrated around the dural
sinus. (A) Representative gating of meningeal ILC2s. ILC2s were
identified by flow cytometry as
CD45+/singlets/lineage−/viable/ST2+/CD25+
cells (Lineage cocktail = CD11b, GR1, CD3, B220, FcεRα, Ter-119;
representative of three biological replicates). (B) Flow cytometry
characterization of meningeal ILC2s (representative of three biological
replicates). (C) Counts of mouse ILC2s and ILC3s
(CD45+/singlets/lineage−/viable/RORγt+
cells) in healthy mouse brain meninges (P = 0.007; left y axis), spinal
meninges (P = 0.015), and spinal cord parenchyma (P = 0.002; right y axis;
n = 3; multiple Student’s t
tests). (D–G) Characterization of the IL-13tdt mouse by
flow cytometry. (D) Representative flow plots of ILC2 tdTomato expression.
Lineage cocktail omitted anti-FcεRα in D and F to allow separate
visualization. (E) >95% of ILC2s are tdTomato+ in
IL-13tdt mouse brain and spinal cord meninges and lung
(n = 3; representative of three experiments). (F)
Representative flow plots of tdTomato expression of other meningeal cell
types. (G) ILC2s, T cells, and mast cells account for the majority of total
tdTomato+ cells in brain and spinal cord meninges and lung
(n = 3; representative of two experiments).
(H–J) Representative images of ILC2s identified as
IL-13tdt+/CD3−/toluidine
blue− cells in dural sinus (H), dura/arachnoid mater
(I), or spinal cord meninges (J) whole mounts (blue arrows represent
IL-13tdt+/CD3−/toluidine
blue− ILC2s, green arrows represent
IL-13tdt+ or −/CD3−/toluidine
blue− T cells, and yellow arrows represent
IL-13tdt+/CD3−/toluidine blue+
mast cells). (K) Quantification of ILC2 localization demonstrates a
concentration in the dural sinus versus other meninges areas (P < 0.0001;
n = 3–4; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s
multiple comparisons test). (L–N) Mice were treated with IL-33 every
other day for 6 d i.p., and on the eighth day, ILC2 numbers were analyzed by
flow cytometry. (L) Representative plots demonstrating expansion of ILC2s in
IL-33–treated mice relative to PBS treatment (gated on
live/CD45+/singlet/Lineage− cells). (M and
N) Counts demonstrating expansion in brain meninges (M; P = 0.009) and
spinal cord meninges (N; P = 0.001; n = 3, representative
of three experiments; Student’s t test). Error bars
represent mean ± SEM; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.We next sought to explore the physical localization of ILC2s in brain and spinal cord
meninges. To that end, we crossed the Yet-Cre 13 (Price et al., 2010) and tdTomatostoplox mice, generating a
new model where any cell that expressed IL-13 is permanently labeled with tdTomato
(IL-13tdt mice). This strategy labels the majority of ILC2s in
healthy brain/spinal cord meninges and lung (Fig. 1,
D and E) and also labels populations of T cells and mast cells in these
tissues (Fig. 1, F and G). A whole mount of
IL-13tdt dura mater revealed a concentration of tdTomato expression
in the transverse and sagittal dural sinuses, which drain venous blood from the
brain (Fig. S1 A). To differentiate tdTomato+ ILC2s from T cells and mast
cells, we costained IL-13tdt meninges with CD3 and toluidine blue to
identify T cells and mast cells, respectively. ILC2s were identified as
tdTomato+/CD3−/toluidine blue−
cells in dural sinus, dura mater, and spinal cord meninges whole mounts (Fig. 1, H–J). ILC2s were heavily
concentrated in the dural sinus and found more sparsely throughout the dura mater
and spinal cord meninges (Fig. 1 K).It has previously been noted that ILC2s expand in response to IL-33 stimulation
(Molofsky et al., 2013), and, to
further confirm the nature of the newly identified meningeal cells, we sought to
repeat this observation in meningeal ILC2s. Indeed, mice treated with IL-33 i.p. for
6 d had up to 3.5-fold expansion of ILC2s in the spinal cord and brain meninges
(Fig. 1, L–N).Given the unique localization of brain meningeal ILC2s, we characterized them
transcriptionally to assess their degree of similarity with other ILC2s, choosing to
compare them with the well-studied population of ILC2s in the lung. ILC2s were FACs
purified from meninges and lung, and >90% pure ILC2s were used for RNAseq
analysis. Among the top genes expressed by meningeal ILC2s are numerous canonical
markers, including the Il-2rα, Il-7r, and
Il1rl1 (IL-33R; Fig. 2 A
and Table S1). To assess the similarity of highly expressed genes in meningeal and
lung ILC2s, we compared the genes expressed at least 1.5 standard deviations above
the mean between the cell types. As predicted, the majority of highly expressed
genes are common between lung and meningeal ILC2s, but there are also discreet sets
of genes delineating them (Fig. 2 B). We
identified 472 significantly altered genes between the groups (adjusted p-value
<0.05; Fig. 2 C and Table S2).
Interestingly, the majority of these genes were up-regulated in lung relative to
meningeal ILC2s (Fig. 2 C). To describe
functional consequences of this differential expression, we identified gene sets
enriched among our differentially expressed genes (Table S2). Among the enriched
gene sets were several relating to inflammation, signal transduction, and
metabolism, suggesting an increased basal activation state in lung relative to
meningeal ILC2s (Fig. 2, D and E). The basis
for these differences is somewhat unclear. Lung ILC2s are exposed to far more
environmental irritants and stimuli than meningeal ILC2s, likely leading to the
observed alternations in transcription. Furthermore, meningeal ILC2s are proximal to
the brain, an exceptionally sensitive tissue, and therefore, a relatively quiescent
rest state could be optimal for healthy brain function.
Figure 2.
RNAseq analysis of ILC2s purified from uninjured meninges and
lung. ILC2s were FACS purified from meninges and lung
preparations
(DAPI−/CD45+/Lineage−/Thy1.2+/ST2+
cells), and purified mRNA was sequenced on an Illumina platform. (A) The top
50 genes by mean normalized read counts expressed in meningeal ILC2s
(n = 3, each sample five pooled mice). (B) UpSet plot
comparing highly expressed genes (expressed >1.5 standard deviations
above mean) of meningeal and lung ILC2s. 1,200 highly expressed genes were
common to both groups, whereas 219 were specific to lung and 176 specific to
meningeal ILC2s. (C) Heat map of significantly altered genes between groups
(472 genes; n = 3, each sample five pooled mice; adjusted
p-value <0.05). (D and E) Gene sets enriched among differentially
expressed genes in lung versus meningeal ILC2s. Histogram (D) and heat maps
(E) of select gene sets and their component genes (n = 3,
each sample five pooled mice; adjusted p-value <0.05).
RNAseq analysis of ILC2s purified from uninjured meninges and
lung. ILC2s were FACS purified from meninges and lung
preparations
(DAPI−/CD45+/Lineage−/Thy1.2+/ST2+
cells), and purified mRNA was sequenced on an Illumina platform. (A) The top
50 genes by mean normalized read counts expressed in meningeal ILC2s
(n = 3, each sample five pooled mice). (B) UpSet plot
comparing highly expressed genes (expressed >1.5 standard deviations
above mean) of meningeal and lung ILC2s. 1,200 highly expressed genes were
common to both groups, whereas 219 were specific to lung and 176 specific to
meningeal ILC2s. (C) Heat map of significantly altered genes between groups
(472 genes; n = 3, each sample five pooled mice; adjusted
p-value <0.05). (D and E) Gene sets enriched among differentially
expressed genes in lung versus meningeal ILC2s. Histogram (D) and heat maps
(E) of select gene sets and their component genes (n = 3,
each sample five pooled mice; adjusted p-value <0.05).IL-33 is a potent stimulus for ILC2s and is released in abundance into the CSF after
SCI (Gadani et al., 2015b). We therefore
tested whether meningeal ILC2s are acutely activated after SCI. Type 2 cytokine
production is a hallmark of ILC2 activation, and using the YET-cre 13 mouse (which
have YFP expressed under the IL-13 promoter), we compared IL-13 induction in
uninjured and 1 d post-injury (1DPI) ILC2s, finding increased YFP expression in
brain but not spinal cord meningeal ILC2s (Fig. 3
A). We repeated this observation using intracellular antibody staining,
finding that brain meningeal but not spinal cord meningeal ILC2s have increased
production of IL-13 and IL-5 at 1DPI (Fig. 3, B and
C). Finally, we tested whether brain meningeal ILC2 cytokine production
is IL-33 dependent using the IL-33−/− mice.
IL-33−/− animals show no significant up-regulation of
IL-13 or IL-5 relative to uninjured animals (Fig. 3,
D and E).
Figure 3.
Activation of meningeal ILC2s after SCI. (A) ILC2 IL-13
expression assessed by YFP mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in YET-cre 13
mice in spinal cord (SC) meninges (i; P = 0.890) and brain meninges (ii; P =
0.007; n = 9, representative of three pooled experiments;
Student’s t test). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of
IL-13 expression in ILC2s at 1DPI in spinal cord meninges (i; P > 0.999)
and brain meninges (ii; P < 0.001; n = 3, representative
of two experiments; Student’s t test). (C) Flow
cytometry analysis of IL-5 expression in ILC2s at 1DPI in spinal cord
meninges (i; P = 0.624) and brain meninges (ii; P = 0.027;
n = 3, representative of two experiments;
Student’s t test). (D) WT and
IL-33−/− animals were injured, and meningeal
ILC2s were analyzed for IL-13 expression 1DPI in spinal cord meninges (i; P
= 0.358) and brain meninges (ii; P = 0.031; n = 4;
Student’s t test). (E) WT and
IL-33−/− animals were injured, and meningeal
ILC2s were analyzed for IL-5 expression 1DPI in spinal cord meninges (i; P =
0.753) and brain meninges (ii; P = 0.003; n = 4;
Student’s t test). (F–H) Uninjured and 1DPI
brain meningeal ILC2 transcriptomes were analyzed by RNAseq. (F) Volcano
plot of injured versus uninjured ILC2 gene expression. 305 genes were
significantly altered between groups (n = 3, each sample
five pooled mice; adjusted p-value <0.050). (G and H) Gene sets enriched
among differentially expressed genes in injured versus meningeal ILC2s.
Histogram (G) and heat maps (H) of select gene sets and their component
genes (n = 3, each sample five pooled mice; adjusted
p-value <0.050). Error bars represent mean ± SEM; *, P ≤
0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.
Activation of meningeal ILC2s after SCI. (A) ILC2 IL-13
expression assessed by YFP mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in YET-cre 13
mice in spinal cord (SC) meninges (i; P = 0.890) and brain meninges (ii; P =
0.007; n = 9, representative of three pooled experiments;
Student’s t test). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of
IL-13 expression in ILC2s at 1DPI in spinal cord meninges (i; P > 0.999)
and brain meninges (ii; P < 0.001; n = 3, representative
of two experiments; Student’s t test). (C) Flow
cytometry analysis of IL-5 expression in ILC2s at 1DPI in spinal cord
meninges (i; P = 0.624) and brain meninges (ii; P = 0.027;
n = 3, representative of two experiments;
Student’s t test). (D) WT and
IL-33−/− animals were injured, and meningeal
ILC2s were analyzed for IL-13 expression 1DPI in spinal cord meninges (i; P
= 0.358) and brain meninges (ii; P = 0.031; n = 4;
Student’s t test). (E) WT and
IL-33−/− animals were injured, and meningeal
ILC2s were analyzed for IL-5 expression 1DPI in spinal cord meninges (i; P =
0.753) and brain meninges (ii; P = 0.003; n = 4;
Student’s t test). (F–H) Uninjured and 1DPI
brain meningeal ILC2 transcriptomes were analyzed by RNAseq. (F) Volcano
plot of injured versus uninjured ILC2 gene expression. 305 genes were
significantly altered between groups (n = 3, each sample
five pooled mice; adjusted p-value <0.050). (G and H) Gene sets enriched
among differentially expressed genes in injured versus meningeal ILC2s.
Histogram (G) and heat maps (H) of select gene sets and their component
genes (n = 3, each sample five pooled mice; adjusted
p-value <0.050). Error bars represent mean ± SEM; *, P ≤
0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.Brain meningeal ILC2s respond to spinal cord–derived signals after injury with
increased cytokine production, and we next characterized the transcriptome of
SCI-activated meningeal ILC2s by RNAseq. We measured global transcriptomic changes
in brain meningeal ILC2s 1 d after SCI, finding numerous up- and down-regulated
genes (Fig. 3 F and Table S3). Among genes
up-regulated after injury are immune checkpoint genes, such as
Pdcd1, receptors, such as Tnfrsf9,
Gpr35, and Il18r1, and those involved in
neuroprotection, such as Calca (encoding calcitonin gene-related
peptide [CGRP]) and the shuttle for its receptor Ramp3 (Fig. 3 F). CGRP is known to be rapidly
up-regulated in the injured CNS (Bulloch et al.,
1998; Ackery et al., 2007) and is
involved in regeneration of peripheral nerves (Blesch and Tuszynski, 2001; Toth et
al., 2009). Notably, expression of Il1rl1 (encoding
ST2), Il5, and Il13 were unchanged after injury.
The lack of measured difference in IL-5 and IL-13 mRNA could represent the transient
nature of their up-regulation in this system. Although the Yet-cre reporter
demonstrated increased YFP, and thus IL-13 promoter activity at 1DPI, it is possible
that increases in IL-13 mRNA are outlived by the YFP reporter.We next identified gene sets enriched in meningeal ILC2s isolated from uninjured
versus injured mice. Several inflammatory gene networks were enriched in ILC2s after
injury, including TNF signaling, IL-2 signaling, biosynthetic processes, and general
cell activation (Fig. 3, G and H; and Table
S3). Interestingly, several of the same genes and gene sets were up-regulated in
meningeal ILC2s after injury and lung ILC2s. Extracting sufficient RNA for analysis
from meningeal ILC2s required pooling five mice per sample, and we therefore chose
to validate results using RNAseq replicates instead of individual gene qPCR. RNAseq
replicates were collected on different days, and only genes/gene sets consistently
different across samples were accepted.ILC2s are known to accumulate at injury sites in the periphery (Rak et al., 2016), but the capacity for ILC2 migration into
inflamed sites is poorly understood. Given that the healthy CNS parenchyma is void
of ILC2s (Fig. 1 C), we reasoned that if
ILC2s accumulate at the SCI site, some of them must have migrated there. We used the
IL-13tdt mouse to identify ILC2s that have infiltrated the lesion
site, finding that they migrate to the injury site by 10DPI (Fig. 4 A). Using flow cytometry, we performed a time course of
ILC2 numbers in the SCI site. ILC2s were detectable in the injury site by 3DPI, but
numbers maximized at 10DPI and persisted through 30DPI (Fig. 4 B). Notably, these cells were competent to produce
IL-13 (Fig. 4 C). This migration was IL-33
independent, as IL-33−/− and WT mice had similar ILC2
infiltration at 10DPI (Fig. 4 D).
Figure 4.
Beneficial role of ILC2s in SCI. (A) Immunofluorescent staining
of IL-13tdt+ ILC2s in the spinal cord 10 d after SCI. Insets show
zoomed-in images of representative ILC2s (white arrows,
IL-13tdt+/CD3−) or T cells (yellow arrows,
IL-13tdt−/CD3+) in the injury site at
10DPI. (B) Time course of ILC2 infiltration into the SCI site measured by
flow cytometry (3DPI vs. 10DPI P = 0.016, 3DPI vs. 30DPI P = 0.015, 5DPI vs.
10DPI P = 0.040, 5DPI vs. 30DPI P = 0.039; n = 3,
representative of two experiments; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s
multiple comparisons test). (C and D) Single-cell suspensions of SCI sites
10DPI were stimulated and assessed for IL-13 expression (C; P = 0.007;
n = 4; Student’s t test). (D)
WT and IL-33−/− mice were injured, and at 10DPI,
the injury site was analyzed for ILC2 infiltration (P = 0.741;
n = 4 WT and 3 IL-33−/− mice;
Student’s t test). (E) FACS-isolated lung-derived
ILC2s (5 × 103) from WT mice were delivered
intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) into ST2−/−
animals in 1 µl PBS the day before injury. The control group received 1
µl PBS i.c.v. (P = 0.017; n = 8; repeated measures
two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons
test). (F and G) Lesion volume was calculated on injured tissues 30DPI. (F)
ILC2-treated mice had smaller lesions (P = 0.040; n = 4;
Student’s t test). (G) Representative coronal images
of GFAP staining from the center of spinal cord lesions. Error bars
represent mean ± SEM; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.
Beneficial role of ILC2s in SCI. (A) Immunofluorescent staining
of IL-13tdt+ ILC2s in the spinal cord 10 d after SCI. Insets show
zoomed-in images of representative ILC2s (white arrows,
IL-13tdt+/CD3−) or T cells (yellow arrows,
IL-13tdt−/CD3+) in the injury site at
10DPI. (B) Time course of ILC2 infiltration into the SCI site measured by
flow cytometry (3DPI vs. 10DPI P = 0.016, 3DPI vs. 30DPI P = 0.015, 5DPI vs.
10DPI P = 0.040, 5DPI vs. 30DPI P = 0.039; n = 3,
representative of two experiments; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s
multiple comparisons test). (C and D) Single-cell suspensions of SCI sites
10DPI were stimulated and assessed for IL-13 expression (C; P = 0.007;
n = 4; Student’s t test). (D)
WT and IL-33−/− mice were injured, and at 10DPI,
the injury site was analyzed for ILC2 infiltration (P = 0.741;
n = 4 WT and 3 IL-33−/− mice;
Student’s t test). (E) FACS-isolated lung-derived
ILC2s (5 × 103) from WT mice were delivered
intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) into ST2−/−
animals in 1 µl PBS the day before injury. The control group received 1
µl PBS i.c.v. (P = 0.017; n = 8; repeated measures
two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons
test). (F and G) Lesion volume was calculated on injured tissues 30DPI. (F)
ILC2-treated mice had smaller lesions (P = 0.040; n = 4;
Student’s t test). (G) Representative coronal images
of GFAP staining from the center of spinal cord lesions. Error bars
represent mean ± SEM; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.Finally, we sought to test the functional impact ILC2s have on recovery from CNS
injury. We pursued a global ILC depletion strategy: Rag1−/−
animals, lacking T and B cells but having Thy1.2+ ILCs, were
reconstituted with Thy1.1 lymphocytes. In this mouse, reconstituted lymphocytes will
bear a different isoform Thy1 than endogenous ILCs. We then injected mice with a
Thy1.2-depleting antibody, targeting ILCs without affecting lymphocytes, as had been
previously performed in literature (Monticelli et
al., 2011; Gorski et al., 2013).
There was no significant effect of depleting ILCs in this way on SCI outcome (Fig.
S2 A); however, the depletion strategy was actually found to be ineffective for
meninges. Anti-Thy1.2 did not deplete meningeal ILCs, but instead only blocked the
Thy1 epitope (Fig. S2, B and C). Our observation should also serve as a caution
against validating depletion by staining for the antigen used to deplete.We next pursued the converse experiment: adding back ILC2s into the CSF before
injury. Meningeal ILC2s are sparse, and it is not feasible to extract sufficient
numbers for reconstitution. Given their relative abundance and increased basal
activity profiles, we used lung-derived ILC2s for adoptive transfer experiments.
ILC2 cytokine production is dependent on IL-33, and to restrict IL-33’s
actions only to our transferred cells, we used ST2−/−
recipients. 5,000 FACS-purified, lung-derived ILC2s were injected into the cisterna
magna of ST2−/− mice 1 d before SCI. This moderate increase
in ILC2 numbers had a significant beneficial effect on functional recovery, as
measured by Basso mouse scale (BMS) score, a behavior score widely used to assess
functional outcome of SCI in mice (Fig. 4 E).
Additionally, we measured the volume size of the lesions, and as expected from BMS
scores, ILC2-treated mice had smaller lesion volumes than control mice (Fig. 4, F and G). Lung ILC2s were selected
based on their availability and activation profile, which includes elevated
immunomodulatory and neuroprotective gene expression. It is important to realize
that in using these cells, we may have tilted the balance in favor of recovery and
that reconstitution with more meningeal ILC2s would be required to achieve the same
benefit. Alternatively, meningeal ILC2s may be specialized to support the injured
CNS through unidentified mechanisms, in which case our reconstitution underestimates
the true impact of ILC2s on SCI.The meningeal space represents a largely unstudied venue for neuroimmune interactions
in the healthy and diseased CNS conditions. This area is densely populated by a
variety of immune cells, some resident (Goldmann
et al., 2016) and other patrolling (Radjavi et al., 2014). The recent discovery of meningeal lymphatic
vessels (Aspelund et al., 2015; Louveau et al., 2015) has shed a new light on
the importance of the meningeal space in the neuroimmune axis. Meningeal immunity is
unique as it exhibits an obvious predominance of type 2 inflammation (Derecki et al., 2010) for reasons that are
not fully understood yet. Moreover, after SCI, type 2 immune responses are
intensified and required for improved outcome (Walsh et al., 2015). One of the immediate cells responding to injuries
in peripheral/barrier tissues are ILC2s. Here, we provide the first evidence for a
meningeal population of ILC2s, demonstrating their abundance in the brain meninges
and characterizing them transcriptionally. We further studied their response to SCI,
demonstrating that after injury, meningeal ILC2s are functionally activated, and
they enter the injury site and improve recovery.Our finding of differential gene expression from brain and lung further suggests that
ILC2 phenotype could be determined, at least in part, by tissue of residence.
Indeed, diverse tissue-dependent ILC2 functions have already been described in
tissues such as adipose (Molofsky et al.,
2013; Odegaard et al., 2016). Of
note, lung ILC2s had up-regulation of numerous inflammatory gene sets relative to
meninges, possibly because of continuous exposure of these cells to environmental
irritants and stimuli. The extent of plasticity between and diversity of roles for
putative ILC2 phenotypes remains an important topic for future study.After SCI, meningeal ILC2s are activated, producing type 2 cytokines and
up-regulating inflammatory gene sets. Among the most prominently up-regulated genes
are Calca, encoding CGRP, and Ramp3, encoding
shuttling protein for its receptor. CGRP is up-regulated in the CNS after injury
(Bulloch et al., 1998; Ackery et al., 2007) and has been implicated
in regeneration of sensory neurons in and out of the CNS (Blesch and Tuszynski, 2001; Toth et al., 2009), migraine pain (Russo, 2015), and immunomodulation (Bracci-Laudiero et al., 2005). Previous studies have noted CGRP receptor
expression in ILC2s, suggesting that they may detect CGRP secreted by nociceptive
neurons (Saenz et al., 2013; Talbot et al., 2015). Our results identify
CGRP as a novel factor potentially released by activated ILC2s.This study is an early foray into the biology of meningeal ILC2s and demonstrates a
novel role for meningeal immune cells as sentinels for CNS-derived alarmins. IL-33
released after CNS injury not only initiates a local response, but also a meningeal
one through actions on ILC2s. ILC2s produce IL-13, both in the meninges and at the
injury site, which could promote the generation of neuroprotective Th2
cells—or directly boost survival of neurons (Walsh et al., 2015). Many other potentially neuroprotective
factors, including Areg, Vegfa,
Il1b, and Calca (Blesch and Tuszynski, 2001; Diem et al., 2003; Sun et al.,
2003; Zhan et al., 2015) could
also contribute to the beneficial effect of lung-derived ILC2 transfer. Further
studies are required to fully understand this meningeal ILC2 response and the
mechanism by which adding ILC2s is beneficial after injury. Furthermore, meningeal
ILC2s, given their perivenous localization, could be first responders in
gut–brain communication. This study provides insight into a novel immune cell
player after CNS injury, the meningeal ILC2, and further work on this population
could lead to therapeutic insights for injury and other neurological disorders.
Materials and methods
Mice
IL-33−/− mice were generated by the trans-NIH Knock-Out
Mouse Project (KOMP) and obtained from the KOMP repository.
ST2−/− mice were generated in the laboratory of A.
McKenzie (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK) and were a gift from
P. Bryce (Northwestern University, Evanston, IL). Yet-Cre 13 mice were generated
by and a gift from R. Locksley (University of California, San Francisco, San
Francisco, CA; Price et al., 2010).
C57/Bl6 and tdTomatostoplox mice were obtained from the Jackson
Laboratory, stock #004999 and #007905, respectively. All transgenic lines were
on the C57/Bl6 genetic background except for Yet-Cre 13, which was BALB/c. The
F1 generation of Yet-Cre 13 × tdTomatostoplox crosses was used.
All animals were housed in temperature- and humidity-controlled rooms,
maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on 7:00 a.m.), and age matched in
each experiment. All strains were kept in identical housing conditions. For
survival surgeries, mice were anesthetized with either 200 µl of
ketamine/xylazine (1 ml ketamine HCl [1 mg/ml], 1 ml of 2% xylazine, 8 ml
saline) or inhaled isoflurane. All procedures complied with regulations of the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of
Virginia (UVA).
Statistics
Statistical tests were performed in Prism (GraphPad Software) or using R as
described in the text and figure legends. In all figures, error bars represent
mean ± SEM; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤
0.001.
Flow cytometry/cell sorting
To prepare single cell suspensions, meninges (brain and spinal cord) were
dissected with fine forceps and digested in RPMI + 1.4 U/ml Collagenase VIII
(Worthington) + 1 mg/ml DNase1 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at 37°C. Lungs
were dissected, minced, and digested for 30 min in RPMI + 1.4 U/ml Collagenase
VIII + 1 mg/ml DNase1 at 37°C. Digested meninges and lung were dissociated
by pipetting and passed through 70-µm filters. Spinal cords were dissected
from PBS-perfused mice, and 1 cm of cord centered on the lesion was isolated,
minced, and digested in RPMI + 4 U/ml papain + 1 mg/ml DNase1 for 20 min. Spinal
cords were triturated with small- and large-bore fire-polished pipette and
passed through a 70-µm filter. Samples were washed in FACs buffer (PBS,
0.05% Na Azide, 1 mM EDTA, 2% FBS) and stained with antibody cocktail and
viability dye for 30 min at 4°C in FACs buffer. For lineage staining, cells
were labeled with biotinylated lineage antibody cocktail, washed, and then
incubated with strepdavidin-PeCy7 or -Fitc (eBioscience) for 30 min at 4°C.
Zombie aqua fixable viability dye (BioLegend) was used to discriminate live cell
populations. To obtain absolute cell counts, counting beads (eBioscience) were
added to the samples. After staining, samples were washed in FACs buffer and
resuspended in 4% PFA. The following antibodies were used (all from eBioscience
unless otherwise noted): CD45-af700, Lineage-biotin (CD11b, B220, CD3, GR1,
TER-119, FcεRα), Thy1.2-Fitc, ST2-Pe, C-kit–ef780,
Sca1-af700, CD25-APC, TCRβ-Fitc or APCCy7, IL-7R–Pe,
C-kit–ef7Pe, ICOSL-APC, Gata3-660, Rorγt, IL-13–PeCy7,
IL-5–Pe, and CD69-PeCy7.To stain intranuclear antigens (Gata3, Rorγt, IL-13, IL-5), cells were
fixed after extracellular staining with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD), washed in perm
buffer, and stained for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were read on a
Gallios cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree
Star). ILC2s (selected as
CD45+/Lineage−/Thy1.2+/ST2+
cells) were sorted on an Influx cell sorter (BD) in the UVA flow cytometry core
facility, achieving a purity of >90%.
RNA sequencing and analysis
ILC2s were FACs sorted, as described above, directly into lysis buffer (PicoPure
RNA isolation kit; Applied Biosystems). RNA purification was performed according
to manufacturer instructions and stored at −80°C until use. Library
preparation, amplification, and RNA sequencing (Illumina) were performed by
HudsonAlpha.
In vitro cell stimulation
For in vitro stimulation and cytokine staining of ILC2s, normalized numbers of
cells were maintained in RPMI + 10% FBS + Anti-anti at 37°C. Cells were
treated with Golgi block (Brefeldin A) and stimulated with PMA/ionomycin for 4 h
before being washed and stained as described in the Flow cytometry/cell sorting
section.
Image quantification
Images were acquired using an SP8 confocal microscope (Leica; fluorescence
images) or a DMI 6000B widefield microscope (Leica; brightfield images).
Counting was done in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) with the
“Cell Counter” plugin (Kurt De Vos, University of Sheffield,
Sheffield, England, UK). Heat maps were generated with the “HeatMap
Histogram” plugin (Samuel Péan).To quantify spinal cord lesion size, 20-µm coronal sections were stained
with GFAP and imaged. Lesion area per slice was quantified using ImageJ, and
total volume was calculated using Excel (Microsoft).
Tissue preparation and immunofluorescence
For quantification of ILC2s, mice were perfused with heparinized (5 U/ml) PBS and
4% PFA, followed by meninges and spinal cord dissection. The tissue was
postfixed for 48 h in 4% PFA, and spinal cords were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose
for 48 h. Spinal cords were cut into 20-µm sections, mounted on
gelatin-coated slides, and stored at −20°C until use. To stain,
tissue was blocked for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (2% serum [of
the secondary’s species]; 1% BSA; 0.1% triton; 0.05% tween; 0.05% Na
Azide) followed by overnight incubation in primary antibody at 4°C. The
following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: chicken
anti-GFAP (AB5541; 1:1,000; EMD Millipore), rat anti-CD3 660 (50-0032; 1:300;
eBioscience), rat anti-CD3 biotin (13-0032; 1:300; eBioscience). Slices were
washed 3× 10 min and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with the
appropriate secondary antibodies (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:1,000),
washed again 3 × 10 min and mounted with AquaMount (Thermo Fisher
Scientific) and DAPI.
Toluidine blue staining
For staining meningeal mast cells, toluidine blue staining was performed on
samples after being stained and imaged for fluorescence markers. Meninges were
stained in 0.5% Toluidine blue O (pH 2.5; Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at room
temperature. Toluidine blue was washed overnight at 4°C, and images were
acquired using brightfield microscopy.
Spinal cord contusion
Female mice were first anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine. The back fur was
shaved and underlying skin sterilized with an iodide/betadine solution. An
incision was made over the T9-T10 vertebrae, and the skin was held back with
retractors. The fascia overlying the spinal cord was removed to expose the
vertebrae. The T10 vertebra was removed with fine rongeurs to expose the spinal
cord. The IH-0400 Impactor (Precision Systems and Instrumentation) was used to
contuse the spinal cord centrally, after which the muscles and skin overlying
the spinal cord were sutured closed and the mouse was allowed to recover on
warming pads. The force of impact was computer controlled and set to 70 or 90
KDyn as noted in the text/legends. Mice were maintained on sulfa water, and
twice daily we performed manual bladder expulsion. Two blinded observers
assessed recovery of hind-limb locomotor activity with the BMS (Basso et al., 2006) after injury.
IL-33 treatment
For IL-33 treatments to expand ILC2s, mice were injected i.p. with 500 ng
carrier-free recombinant IL-33 (eBioscience) every other day. After three
injections, mice were sacrificed, and ILC2 numbers were analyzed by flow
cytometry.
RNAseq analysis
The raw sequencing reads (FASTQ files) went through two stages of preprocessing
to remove low-quality reads and bases. First, they were chastity filtered, which
removes any clusters that have a higher than expected intensity of the called
base compared with other bases. Then they were trimmed with Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014) to remove low-quality
bases (minimum read length after trimming = 36). After preprocessing, the
quality of the reads was evaluated using FastQC, and after passing quality
control (QC), the reads were aligned to the UCSC mm9 genome (Harrow et al., 2012) using the
splice-aware read aligner STAR (Dobin et al.,
2013). The quality of the alignments was next assessed by SAMStat
(Lassmann et al., 2011), and any
low-quality alignments were removed with SAMtools (Li et al., 2009; MAPQ < 10). Next, the number of reads
aligning to each gene was quantified with HTSeq (Anders et al., 2015), and then the Bioconductor package
(Love et al., 2014) DESeq2 was used
to normalize the raw counts and perform exploratory analysis (e.g., PCA) and
differential expression analysis. The Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery
rate procedure was used to correct the p-values for multiple testing. Heat maps
of the differentially expressed genes generated with the R package pheatmap
(https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap).
To compare the highly expressed genes in the uninjured lung versus uninjured
brain meninges, the normalized, log2 transformed counts were
converted to standard scores (z-score) using the scale function
in R. The mean z-score for each gene was then calculated, and those with a
z-score >1.5 (i.e., 1.5 standard deviations above the mean) were considered
highly expressed. The UpSet plot (Lex et al.,
2014) used to visualize the overlap between the uninjured lung and
brain samples was created with the R package UpSetR (Gehlenborg, 2016). The R implementation of
Fisher’s exact test, fisher.test, was used to identify
enriched gene sets in the differentially expressed genes using two gene set
collections: the GO biological process from MSigDB (Subramanian et al., 2005; C5) and the gene families from
the Hugo Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC; Gray et al., 2015).
Accession number
All sequencing data has been uploaded to the GEO repository under accession no.
GSE90908.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 contains images of whole-mount IL-13tdt meninges,
demonstrating visually how ILC2s are concentrated in the dural sinus area. Fig.
S2 contains data regarding the use of anti-Thy1.2 antibody to deplete ILC2s,
demonstrating that, in our hands, it merely blocks the Thy1.2 epitope. Table S1
lists normalized gene expression values for all RNAseq samples (uninjured and
injured meninges and uninjured lung ILC2s). Table S2 lists differential
expression between uninjured meninges and lung ILC2s, as well as the gene sets
enriched in lung ILC2s. Table S3 lists differential expression between uninjured
and injured meninges ILC2s, as well as the gene sets enriched in injured
meninges ILC2s. Tables S1–S3 are available as Excel files.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: D Michele Basso; Lesley C Fisher; Aileen J Anderson; Lyn B Jakeman; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexander Lex; Nils Gehlenborg; Hendrik Strobelt; Romain Vuillemot; Hanspeter Pfister Journal: IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.579
Authors: A P Coulibaly; W T Gartman; V Swank; J A Gomes; L Ruozhuo; J DeBacker; J J Provencio Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.210