Literature DB >> 23752249

Dynamics of the meningeal CD4(+) T-cell repertoire are defined by the cervical lymph nodes and facilitate cognitive task performance in mice.

A Radjavi1, I Smirnov2, N Derecki2, J Kipnis1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23752249      PMCID: PMC3773254          DOI: 10.1038/mp.2013.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   15.992


× No keyword cloud information.
We recently identified the meninges, which envelopes the outer and ventricular surfaces of the brain and spinal cord, as a candidate site for beneficial T-cell interaction with the CNS [3]. The meninges are permissive to circulating lymphocytes, harbor MHCII-expressing cell types, and are well situated to broadly affect CNS function [3, 7, 8]. To study the dynamics of CD4+ T-cells at this site, we employed a parabiotic mouse model, enabling us to characterize the relative intra-tissue cell turnover rate in the CD4+ compartment. By day 15 after parabiotic surgery, CD4+ T-cells equilibrate across the blood and lymphoid tissues, however, their turnover in the meninges (and CNS draining dCLN) was severely delayed (Fig. 1a), suggesting that the entry of CD4+ T-cells was gated, passively or actively, by the meninges. We broadly define “passive gating” as an intrinsically CD4-restrictive meningeal environment, and “active gating” as permissive but regulated entry.
Figure 1

(a) Ly5.1 (Black) and Ly5.2 (Blue) mice were parabiotically joined. After 15 days, each mouse was perfused with PBS and the indicated tissues were analyzed for self and donor CD4+ T-cells by FACS, showing slow relative T-cell turnover in the meninges compared with other tissues and slow turnover in the dCLNs compared with iLNs (representative of n = 4 pairs). (b) wild-type (Thy1.1) splenocytes were adoptively transferred i.v. into OTII recipients, the indicated tissues were analyzed for donor CD4+ T-cells 21 days after transfer to show preferential reconstitution of the meninges and dCLNs. (c) Ly5.1 and OTII mice were parabiotically joined and analyzed after 15 days as in (a) showing preferential reconstitution of wild-type cells in the OTII meninges and dCLNs. (d) CD44 analysis of CD4+ T-cells from blood of wild-type (left) and OTII (right) mice that were parabiotically joined for 15 days (lower panel), and their wild-type Ly5.1 parabiotic counterparts (upper panel) showing incomplete homogenization of CD44+ T-cells between the blood of partner mice. (e) FACS analysis of CD11B+/CD19− populations (lower plots) or CD43+/CD4+ (upper plots) from blood of Ly5.1(left) and ly5.2 (right) mice that were parabiotically joined for 15 days, showing limited monocyte exchange between partners. (f) Total meningeal CD4+ T-cell numbers, (n = 3mice/group *, P < 0.05; Student’s t-test) and (g) MWM acquisition (left) and reversal (right) of deep cervical lymph node-resected or sham operated mice 14 days post surgery, (combined data from 3 independent experiments, sham; n=16mice/group, dCLN resection; n=22mice/group *, P < 0.05; two way repeated measures ANOVA).

To differentiate between active and passive gating, we transferred wild-type Ly5.1 splenocytes into OTII mice. We predicted that given the low CD4+ T-cell turnover in the meninges, seeding by transferred wild-type T-cells (i.e., their “passive gating”) would occur more slowly here than in other tissues. Surprisingly however, the meninges were the most receptive of all the analyzed tissues, with the largest percentage of their total CD4+ T-cells originating from transferred Ly5.1 splenocytes (Fig. 1b). We interpreted this result to mean the meninges is not globally restrictive to CD4+ T-cell entry and residence. Polyclonal wild-type T-cells are known to expand homeostatically under conditions of lymphopenia or low clonal diversity[9]. To determine whether homeostatic expansion was driving T-cells from the blood into the meninges, we connected OTII transgenic mice parabiotically with wild-type partners (Fig. 1c). Here, as in the adoptive transfer model, the OTII mouse meninges accepted impressive numbers of donor CD4+ T-cells from the blood. Surprisingly, whereas “naïve” CD44− T-cells equilibrated evenly between parabiotic partners, CD44hi “activated/memory” T-cells did not (Fig. 1d). Not only can this explain the lack of T-cell accumulation in the meninges of the wild-type partner, but it also serves as a cautionary tale concerning a major assumption of the parabiotic model, namely that the unified circulatory system guarantees homogenous leukocyte circulation. In fact, mixing of CD11b+ monocyte populations was also severely diminished (Fig. 1e), suggesting either that some cell types cannot pass through the unified capillary junctions or that they extravasate directly into the site of surgical injury. Both the uniquely slow T-cell turnover rate in the wild type meninges and the increased seeding of the meninges of OTII mice by wild type T-cells was also apparent in the dCLNs. To explore possible coupling of the meninges and dCLNs, and to find out how interruption of this coupling might affect the T-cell composition of the meninges, we surgically resected dCLNs of wild-type mice. Two weeks after surgery the numbers of CD4+ T-cells in the meninges of operated mice were substantially increased (Fig. 1f). To find out what effect, if any, dCLN resection might have on behavioral outcomes, we subjected resected and sham operated mice to the Morris Water Maze (MWM) behavioral task, and observed significant spatial learning and memory impairment in the dCLN resected group–particularly in the reversal phase of the assay (Fig. 1g). While the notion that T-cells are required for normal learning and memory is not an intuitive one, every mode of T-cell depletion attempted so far substantiates this necessity (reviewed in [10]). This phenomenon is particularly interesting given that the cognitive decline seen in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and in those suffering from age-related senility or HIV-associated dementia, is correlated with a collapse in adaptive immunity that occurs most saliently within the CD4+ T-cell compartment. As we begin to ask what role(s) T-cells are playing in higher brain functions, honing in on the specific localization and migratory behavior of T-cells that operate in the meningeal spaces of the CNS is a likely prerequisite to understanding their ultimate function. Additionally, while the phenotypic readout in this study is learning and memory, a general understanding of T-cell makeup and behavior in the meninges may also be applicable to CNS pathologies such as MS, in which lymphocyte accumulation in the meninges is thought to precede parenchymal infiltration [7].

Methods

Animals

Adult mice were purchased from Jax and housed under standard conditions. All animal procedures were approved by the ACUC at the University of Virginia.

Behavior

Morris Water Maze experiments were conducted using equipment and protocols described by Derecki et al [3] (and in supplementary methods).

Parabiosis and adoptive transfer

Parabiosis was carried out on weight-matched females using a modified surgical protocol as described in supplementary methods.

Cervical lymph node resection and sham surgery

An incision was made midline 5 mm superior to the clavicle, SCM muscle retracted, and dCLN removed with forceps. Sham mice received only the incision and SCM retraction. Detailed protocol and post-op care described in supplementary methods.
  10 in total

1.  Multiple approaches to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L Steinman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Inflammation and therapeutic vaccination in CNS diseases.

Authors:  Howard L Weiner; Dennis J Selkoe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The ins and outs of T-lymphocyte trafficking to the CNS: anatomical sites and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Britta Engelhardt; Richard M Ransohoff
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 16.687

4.  Naive and memory CD4+ T cell survival controlled by clonal abundance.

Authors:  Jason Hataye; James J Moon; Alexander Khoruts; Cavan Reilly; Marc K Jenkins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neuroprotective autoimmunity: naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress the ability to withstand injury to the central nervous system.

Authors:  Jonathan Kipnis; Tal Mizrahi; Ehud Hauben; Iftach Shaked; Ethan Shevach; Michal Schwartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Pro-cognitive properties of T cells.

Authors:  Jonathan Kipnis; Sachin Gadani; Noël C Derecki
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  Regulation of learning and memory by meningeal immunity: a key role for IL-4.

Authors:  Noël C Derecki; Amber N Cardani; Chun Hui Yang; Kayla M Quinnies; Anastasia Crihfield; Kevin R Lynch; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  Localizing central nervous system immune surveillance: meningeal antigen-presenting cells activate T cells during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Pia Kivisäkk; Jaime Imitola; Stine Rasmussen; Wassim Elyaman; Bing Zhu; Richard M Ransohoff; Samia J Khoury
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Maladaptation to mental stress mitigated by the adaptive immune system via depletion of naturally occurring regulatory CD4+CD25+ cells.

Authors:  Hagit Cohen; Yaniv Ziv; Michal Cardon; Zeev Kaplan; Michael A Matar; Yori Gidron; Michal Schwartz; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2006-05

10.  Adaptive immunity affects learning behavior in mice.

Authors:  Anna Brynskikh; Ted Warren; Julia Zhu; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 7.217

  10 in total
  47 in total

1.  Peripheral leukocyte populations and oxidative stress biomarkers in aged dogs showing impaired cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Paolo Mongillo; Daniela Bertotto; Elisa Pitteri; Annalisa Stefani; Lieta Marinelli; Gianfranco Gabai
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 2.  How and why do T cells and their derived cytokines affect the injured and healthy brain?

Authors:  Anthony J Filiano; Sachin P Gadani; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Brain antigen-reactive CD4+ T cells are sufficient to support learning behavior in mice with limited T cell repertoire.

Authors:  Ali Radjavi; Igor Smirnov; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 4.  Central Nervous System: (Immunological) Ivory Tower or Not?

Authors:  Ioana A Marin; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease.

Authors:  Thomas C Fung; Christine A Olson; Elaine Y Hsiao
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  The immune system as a novel regulator of sex differences in brain and behavioral development.

Authors:  Lars H Nelson; Kathryn M Lenz
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Differential effects of chronic stress in young-adult and old female mice: cognitive-behavioral manifestations and neurobiological correlates.

Authors:  A Lotan; T Lifschytz; G Wolf; S Keller; H Ben-Ari; P Tatarsky; N Pillar; K Oved; J Sharabany; T K Merzel; T Matsumoto; Y Yamawaki; B Mernick; E Avidan; S Yamawaki; A Weller; N Shomron; B Lerer
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 8.  Immune cell regulation of glia during CNS injury and disease.

Authors:  Andrew D Greenhalgh; Sam David; F Chris Bennett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Age-Associated Resident Memory CD8 T Cells in the Central Nervous System Are Primed To Potentiate Inflammation after Ischemic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Rodney M Ritzel; Joshua Crapser; Anita R Patel; Rajkumer Verma; Jeremy M Grenier; Anjali Chauhan; Evan R Jellison; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 10.  Contributions of the adaptive immune system to mood regulation: Mechanisms and pathways of neuroimmune interactions.

Authors:  Miles Herkenham; Stacey L Kigar
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.