| Literature DB >> 27990333 |
D Rabern Simmons1, Z Wilhelm de Beer2, Yin-Tse Huang1, Craig Bateman3, Alina S Campbell4, Tyler J Dreaden5, You Li1, Randy C Ploetz4, Adam Black6, Hou-Feng Li7, Chi-Yu Chen8, Michael J Wingfield2, Jiri Hulcr3.
Abstract
Raffaelea (Ophiostomatales) is a genus of more than 20 ophiostomatoid fungi commonly occurring in symbioses with wood-boring ambrosia beetles. We examined ambrosia beetles and plant hosts in the USA and Taiwan for the presence of these mycosymbionts and found 22 isolates representing known and undescribed lineages in Raffaelea. From 28S rDNA and β-tubulin sequences, we generated a molecular phylogeny of Ophiostomatales and observed morphological features of seven cultures representing undescribed lineages in Raffaelea s. lat. From these analyses, we describe five new species in Raffaelea s. lat.: R. aguacate, R. campbellii, R. crossotarsa, R. cyclorhipidia, and R. xyleborina spp. nov. Our analyses also identified two plant-pathogenic species of Raffaelea associated with previously undocumented beetle hosts: (1) R. quercivora, the causative agent of Japanese oak wilt, from Cyclorhipidion ohnoi and Crossotarsus emancipatus in Taiwan, and (2) R. lauricola, the pathogen responsible for laurel wilt, from Ambrosiodmus lecontei in Florida. The results of this study show that Raffaelea and associated ophiostomatoid fungi have been poorly sampled and that future investigations on ambrosia beetle mycosymbionts should reveal a substantially increased diversity.Entities:
Keywords: Japanese oak wilt; entomogenous fungi; insect-fungus interactions; laurel wilt; molecular phylogenetics; mycosymbioses
Year: 2016 PMID: 27990333 PMCID: PMC5159597 DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2016.07.02.06
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IMA Fungus ISSN: 2210-6340 Impact factor: 3.515
Cultures of Raffaelea examined in our molecular phylogenetic analyses, with ex-type cultures of new species in bold.
| USA | Florida (Miami-Dade Co.) | |||||||||
| USA | Florida (Miami-Dade Co., Homestead) | |||||||||
| 110p2 | CMW44801 | USA | Florida (Miami-Dade Co., Homestead) | KR018430 | KR018444 | KR018403 | ||||
| Hulcr7355 | USA | Florida | KX267101 | KX267112 | ||||||
| Hulcr7375 | USA | Florida | KX267102 | KX267113 | ||||||
| Taiwan | Fushan | |||||||||
| Taiwan | Fushan | |||||||||
| Hulcr4530 | (PL1007) | USA | Florida (Lake Kissimmee) | KX267116 | ||||||
| Hulcr7161 | Taiwan | KX267105 | KX267117 | |||||||
| Hulcr7164 | Taiwan | KX267106 | KX267118 | |||||||
| Hulcr7167 | Taiwan | Fushan | KX267107 | KX267119 | KX267131 | |||||
| Hulcr7176 | Taiwan | Fushan | KX267108 | KX267120 | KX267132 | |||||
| Hulcr4520 | (C2335) | USA | South Carolina (Hunting Island State Park) | KX267121 | KX267137 | |||||
| Hulcr4717 | USA | Virginia (Albemarle Co., Batesville) | KX267122 | KX267133 | KX267138 | |||||
| Hulcr4719 | USA | Pennsylvania (Huntingdon Co. Raystown Lake) | KX267109 | KX267123 | KX267134 | |||||
| USA | Florida (Highlands Co., Venus) | |||||||||
| Hulcr6100 | USA | Florida (Highlands Co., Venus) | KX267111 | KX267125 | ||||||
| Hulcr6406 | USA | Florida (Highlands Co., Venus) | KX267126 | KX267139 | ||||||
| Hulcr6408 | USA | Florida (Highlands Co., Venus) | KX267127 | KX267140 | ||||||
| Hulcr5951 | (PL1635) | Thailand | Mae Chaem | KJ909308 | KJ909310 | KJ909309 | ||||
| Hulcr7507 | USA | Florida | KX267128 | KX267141 | ||||||
| PL1001 | CMW38062 | USA | California | KJ909293 | KJ909295 | KJ909294 |
Fig. 1.Best ML tree from GARLI analysis of 28S rDNA and βT data matrix of Ophiostomatales genera with Sordariales as outgroup (Musvuugwa ). Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap percentages ≥ 70 % from a summary of 500 replicates, and branches in bold represent BPP ≥ 95 %. L denotes GenBank accession number of 28S rDNA sequence for taxon; B denotes GenBank accession number of βT sequence for taxon. Types of genera and new species of Raffaelea in bold.
Fig. 2.Raffaelea aguacate (PL1004) morphological features in pure culture on MEA. A. Colony growth after 9 d at 25 °C. B. Hyphae bearing long, tapering conidiogenous cells with conidia at apex, and occasional sessile lateral conidia (black arrowhead); elongated conidia may bud yeast-like daughter cell (black arrow). C. Hyphae with long and slightly irregular conidiogenous cells, with conidia truncated at base (white arrowhead). Bar in B applies also to C.
Fig. 3.Raffaelea campbellii (103p2) morphological features in pure culture on MEA. A. Colony growth after 9 d at 25 °C. B–D. Hyphae bearing flask-shaped conidiogenous cells with ovoid to elliptical conidia, often truncated at the base (white arrowheads). Bar in D applies also to B–C.
Fig. 4.Raffaelea crossotarsa (Hulcr7182) morphological features in pure culture on MEA. A. Colony growth after 9 d at 25 °C. B–C. Hyphae bearing long, tapering conidiogenous cells with conidia. D–E. Globose to ovoid conidia budding yeast-like daughter cells (black arrows), which protrude from prominent isthmuses (white arrows). Bar in B applies also to C–E.
Fig. 5.Raffaelea cyclorhipidia (Hulcr7168) morphological features in pure culture on MEA. A. Colony growth after 9 d at 25 °C. B–C. Hyphae bearing typical flask-shaped conidiogenous cells with conidia at apex, and occasional lateral sessile conidia (black arrowheads). D. Elliptical to elongate conidia budding yeast-like daughter cells (black arrows). Bar in B applies also to C–D.
Fig. 6.Raffaelea xyleborina (Hulcr6099) morphological features in pure culture on MEA. A. Colony growth after 9 d at 25 °C. B. Micronematous conidiogenous cells with ovoid conidia truncated at base (white arrowhead). C. Micronematous conidiophore with short conidiogenous cell sessile at side (black arrowhead) and at apex. D. Globose to ovoid conidia truncated at the base (white arrowhead) and budding yeast-like daughter cells (black arrows). Bar in C applies also to B–D.