Andres Klein Szanto1, Manti Guha2, Satish Srinivasan2, Kip Guja3, Edison Mejia3, Miguel Garcia-Diaz3, F Brad Johnson4, Gordon Ruthel5, Brett A Kaufman6, Eric F Rappaport7, M Rebecca Glineburg4, Ji-Kang Fang2, Andres J Klein-Szanto, Hiroshi Nakagawa8, Jeelan Basha9, Tapas Kundu9, Narayan G Avadhani2. 1. Histopathology Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University , Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Sciences & Mari Lowe Center for Comparative Oncology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Penn Vet Imaging Core, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburg , Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 7. Nucleic Acid/Protein Core Facility, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute , Philadelphia, PA, USA. 8. Department of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA. 9. Transcription and Disease Laboratory, Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research , Jakkur , Bangalore, India.
Abstract
Reduced mitochondrial DNA copy number, mitochondrial DNA mutations or disruption of electron transfer chain complexes induce mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling, which induces global change in nuclear gene expression ultimately contributing to various human pathologies including cancer. Recent studies suggest that these mitochondrial changes cause transcriptional reprogramming of nuclear genes although the mechanism of this cross talk remains unclear. Here, we provide evidence that mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling regulates chromatin acetylation and alters nuclear gene expression through the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein A2 (hnRNAP2). These processes are reversed when mitochondrial DNA content is restored to near normal cell levels. We show that the mitochondrial stress-induced transcription coactivator hnRNAP2 acetylates Lys 8 of H4 through an intrinsic histone lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) activity with Arg 48 and Arg 50 of hnRNAP2 being essential for acetyl-CoA binding and acetyltransferase activity. H4K8 acetylation at the mitochondrial stress-responsive promoters by hnRNAP2 is essential for transcriptional activation. We found that the previously described mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling-mediated transformation of C2C12 cells caused an increased expression of genes involved in various oncogenic processes, which is retarded in hnRNAP2 silenced or hnRNAP2 KAT mutant cells. Taken together, these data show that altered gene expression by mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling involves a novel hnRNAP2-dependent epigenetic mechanism that may have a role in cancer and other pathologies.
Reduced mitochondrial DNA copy number, mitochondrial DNA mutations or disruption of electron transfer chain complexes induce mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling, which induces global change in nuclear gene expression ultimately contributing to various human pathologies including cancer. Recent studies suggest that these mitochondrial changes cause transcriptional reprogramming of nuclear genes although the mechanism of this cross talk remains unclear. Here, we provide evidence that mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling regulates chromatin acetylation and alters nuclear gene expression through the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein A2 (hnRNAP2). These processes are reversed when mitochondrial DNA content is restored to near normal cell levels. We show that the mitochondrial stress-induced transcription coactivator hnRNAP2 acetylates Lys 8 of H4 through an intrinsic histone lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) activity with Arg 48 and Arg 50 of hnRNAP2 being essential for acetyl-CoA binding and acetyltransferase activity. H4K8 acetylation at the mitochondrial stress-responsive promoters by hnRNAP2 is essential for transcriptional activation. We found that the previously described mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling-mediated transformation of C2C12 cells caused an increased expression of genes involved in various oncogenic processes, which is retarded in hnRNAP2 silenced or hnRNAP2 KAT mutant cells. Taken together, these data show that altered gene expression by mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling involves a novel hnRNAP2-dependent epigenetic mechanism that may have a role in cancer and other pathologies.
The mitochondrial genome and its function are highly sensitive to environmental toxins,
drugs and food additives. In addition, reduction in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number
and associated changes in mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) and
mitochondrial dysfunction are common in numerous pathophysiological conditions, such as
aging, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and cardiomyopathy [1]. Dysfunctional mitochondria initiate retrograde signaling that is
propagated through multiple mechanisms, including the Ca2+/calmodulin activated
calcineurin pathway, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced hypoxia inducible
factor (HIF) pathway, mitochondrial unfolded protein response or an AMPK activation
pathway [2-6]. Mitochondrial
retrograde signaling (MtRS) has been reported in different pathological conditions,
including myoclonic epilepsy with ragged-red fibers (MERRF), diabetes, aging, cancer and
deafness [7-11]. Notably, MtRS
is intimately connected to disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential at its point of
initiation and a shift in cellular metabolism as part of survival strategy through altered
nuclear gene expression that determines cell fate [12].
However, the molecular mechanism underlying these processes remains unclear.Compelling evidence from several studies supports the involvement of MtRS in tumor
progression and cancer metastasis [13-16]. We have reported that in response to reduced mtDNA copy number
the retrograde signaling is initiated by increased cytosolic [Ca2+]c
and the activation of protein phosphatase, calcineurin (Cn). In addition, reducing the
mtDNA copy number in skeletal myocyte C2C12 cells below a certain threshold level
(hereafter termed partial mtDNA depletion or PmtDNA depletion) causes metabolic shift to
glycolysis, resulting in the emergence of tumorigenic cells from otherwise non-tumor
forming immortalized cells [2, 13, 15, 17,
18]. In PmtDNA-depleted C2C12 cells, the induced
activation of Akt1, glucose transporter (Glut4), ryanodine receptor
(RyR1), and cathepsin L promoters depends on the activation of nuclear
transcription factors NFκB, C/EBPδ, CREB and NFAT. We
previously showed that these transcription factors were brought together to form an
enhanceosome complex at the target promoters by a stress-induced RNA binding protein,
heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein A2 (hnRNPA2). HnRNPA2 itself is activated in response to
mtDNA depletion and acts as a transcriptional coactivator to propagate the signaling
[19-21]. Interestingly, several
studies suggest that hnRNPA2 is important in tumor progression and proliferation [22, 23].Histone acetylation is a reversible epigenetic modification for transcriptional
regulation. Histone lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) are enzymes that can transfer an
acetyl moiety from acetyl-CoA and acetylate ε-lysine on the histone side chains
[24]. Cellular and environmental cues activate KATs to
alter the dynamic state of chromatin and ultimately determine the transcriptional fate of
genes [25]. As many transcriptional coactivators are KAT
proteins or recruit other KATs during active gene transcription [26], we investigated its role in transcription activation of stress-target
promoters.In this study, we show that altered mitochondrial function and its associated stress
signaling have a causal role in transcriptional and epigenetic reprogramming of nuclear
gene expression. We also report that hnRNPA2 is a novel mitochondrial stress-activated
KAT, which acetylates histones on the MtRS target gene promoters resulting in altered
epigenetic status of the cells. In addition, our results show that mitochondrial
dysfunction-induced stress is a novel cellular cue for telomerase activation in
immortalized cells. In a broader context, our findings here point to an important role for
mitochondria as determinants of cell fate by altering the expression of large sets of
nuclear genes through epigenetic mechanisms.
Results
H4 is acetylated at MtRS target gene promoters
MtDNA content was reduced by either EtBR treatment or Tfam short hairpin RNA (shRNA) as
described in ‘Materials and Methods’ section (Supplementary Figure S1A,B, D,E). Reduction in mtDNA copy number caused
marked reduction in basal and ATP-coupled respiration, indicative of mitochondrial
dysfunction in C2C12 cells (Figure 1a). As mentioned
earlier, MtRS modulates the expression of a set of stress-target genes resulting in an
acquired proliferative and oncogenic phenotype [13,
15, 19, 21]. Previously, we identified the minimal promoter regions of
the MtRS target genes, mRyR1 (−205 to +1) and mAkt1
(−900 to +1), and showed that these regions contain cis-DNA elements
required for mitochondrial stress response [19, 21]. Here, we show that these promoters were transcriptionally
activated in PmtDNA-depl cells and this activation was diminished in cells stably
expressing shRNA against hnRNPA2 (Figure 1b). Chromatin
immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis shows that association of hnRNPA2 with the
stress-target gene promoters cathepsin L, RyR1 and Akt1 was markedly increased in
PmtDNA-depl cells, which was reduced by ~80% in reverted cells (Figure 1c; Supplementary Figure S3B).
Figure 1
HnRNPA2-dependent histone H4 acetylation at stress-target gene promoters in
mtDNA-depleted cells. (a) Effects of PmtDNA depletion on cellular respiration.
(Left panel) Basal cellular respiration indicated as the oxygen consumption rate of
parental, PmtDNA-depleted (EtBr-treated or Tfam shRNA) C2C12 cells measured on
Seahorse XF24 analyzer using 50 000 cells per type. (Right panel) ATP-coupled and
maximal respiration measured by sequential addition of oligomycin
(2 μg ml−1), 3,5 dinitrophenol (DNP)
(75 μm) and rotenone (1 μm),
respectively. Data are represented as mean±s.d. (b) (Top panels) Cartoons of
the mitochondrial stress-responsive RyR1 and Akt1 promoter regions
depicting the putative mitochondrial stress-induced transcription factor binding sites
mapped using the MatInspector algorithm. (Bottom panels) Promoter luciferase activities
of stress-target genes, Akt1 and RyR1 after 48 h transfections
in control (parental C2C12 cells), PmtDNA-depleted/mock-shRNA and PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh
C2C12 cells. pGL3 basic vector was used as negative control. Renilla luciferase
activities were used for normalization of transfection efficiency. Data represent
mean±s.d. (c) ChIP assay showing association of hnRNPA2 at cathepsin L
promoter in control (parental C2C12 cells), PmtDNA-depleted and reverted C2C12 cells
using hnRNPA2 antibody. (d) ChIP assay of RyR1 and Akt1
promoters from control, PmtDNA-depl, and PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells immunoprecipitated
using an antibody to hyperacetylated histone H4. Data are represented as
mean±s.d.
As transcription activation and histone acetylation are interrelated, we investigated
histone acetylation on the promoter regions of control, PmtDNA-depl cells and
PmtDNA-depl cells stably expressing hnRNPA2shRNA (PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh). ChIP assays
showed marked elevation of H4 acetylation (6-fold increase in RyR1 and ~50-fold
in Akt1 promoter) in PmtDNA-depl cells compared with control cells (Figure 1d). Notably, this hyperacetylation was lost by
shRNA-mediated knockdown of hnRNPA2, suggesting that H4 hyperacetylation of target gene
promoters in response to MtRS may be mediated by hnRNPA2.
Telomerase genes are targets of MtRS-activated hnRNPA2
One hallmark of highly proliferative cancer cells is activation of telomerase to
maintain the critical telomere length required to prevent cells from going into
senescence. We previously demonstrated that hnRNPA2 acts as a transcriptional
coactivator for several mitochondrial stress-target genes by associating with the
enhanceosome complex at their promoters [19, 21]. Partial depletion of mtDNA in C2C12, MCF10A and MEF cells
induced MtRS target genes (Supplementary Figure S1C) and
proliferative phenotype [2, 13, 15, 19,
21]. This prompted us to consider the possibility that
hnRNPA2 transcriptionally regulates telomerase by which mtDNA-depleted cells evade
senescence and acquire oncogenic phenotype (Figure 2a). We
observed marked increase in Telomerase RNA Component (Terc) and Telomerase
reverse transcriptase (Tert) transcripts (10–20-fold) in PmtDNA-depl
C2C12 cells, whereas this effect was diminished (50–75%) in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh
cells (Figure 2a). The increased transcription of
Terc and Tert in PmtDNA-depl cells was also observed in MCF10A and
MEFs (Figure 2b and c). Notably, Tert and
Terc activation in PmtDNA-depl cells was Akt-dependent, further supporting
the role of MtRS (Figure 2b).
Figure 2
PmtDNA depletion induces telomerase activation by hnRNPA2. (a) Transcript levels
of Tert and Terc in control, PmtDNA-depl and PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh
C2C12 cells assessed by real time PCR. (b) Terc and Tert
transcript levels in wild-type (WT) and protein kinase B/AKT kinase (AKT) knockout (KO)
mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) parental and Tfam shRNA cells. (c)
Transcript levels of Terc in parental and PmtDNA-depl MCF10A cells assessed by
real time PCR. (d) Q-TRAP assay for telomerase activity was assessed in total
cell extracts (1 μg protein) from control, PmtDNA-depleted (EtBr-treated or
Tfam shRNA), PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh and reverted C2C12 cells. Cell extracts
were treated either with RNAse or heat inactivated for negative controls. The telomerase
expressing cancer cell lines HepG2 and HCT116 are used as positive controls and
Terc null msf 923 cell lysate was used as a negative control. Data are
represented as mean±s.d.
Quantitative telomeric repeat amplification protocol (Q-TRAP) assay showed that
PmtDNA-depl cell extracts exhibited ~6–7-fold higher telomerase activity, whereas
in reverted cells the telomerase activity was similar to control cells, demonstrating a
causal role of PmtDNA depletion in telomerase activation (Figure
2d). Skin fibroblasts from Terc null mice (msf 923) [27], used as negative controls showed no detectable activity
(Figure 2d). Notably, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells showed
marked reduction in telomerase activity confirming that hnRNPA2 regulates telomerase
gene expression in these immortalized cells with impaired mitochondrial function.
HnRNPA2 is a histone lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) and Akt augments its
function
Results in Figure 1d raised the possibility that hnRNPA2
either has intrinsic KAT activity or regulates other KATs in vivo. We therefore
tested if purified hnRNPA2 can catalyze protein acetylation. As shown in Figure 3a, purified recombinant hnRNPA2 acetylated histone H4 as
seen from the filter-binding assays using 14C-labeled acetyl-CoA. We further
confirmed the KAT activity of hnRNPA2 by additional approaches such as filter-binding
assays using fluorescent probes, ELISA (using anti-acetyl lysine antibody) using in
vitro translated hnRNPA2 in a transcription-linked translation system as well as
recombinant purified (<85% pure) proteins (Supplementary Figure
S2A–C). Notably, hnRNPA2 acetylated mononucleosomes as assessed by a
filter-binding assay (Figure 3a, right panel). Furthermore,
the KAT activity of hnRNPA2 was protein concentration-dependent and was abrogated
following either heat inactivation or repeated freeze-thawing (Supplementary Figure S2D and G) confirming its enzymatic nature.
Figure 3
Characterization of KAT activity of hnRNPA2. (a) (Left panel) KAT activity of
purified ×6 His-HnRNPA2 measured by a filter-binding assay using H4 peptide
(residues 1–19) and 14C Acetyl-CoA as substrates (Supplementary Figure S2). Recombinant Akt kinase (Millipore, Cat #
14–276) was used to phosphorylate hnRNPA2 before the filter-binding assay as
indicated (Supplementary Figure S2I). (Right panel)
Filter-binding assay showing acetylation using mononucleosomes as substrate. (b)
(Top) Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) profile of
hnRNPA2-mediated acetylation status using histone H4 (synthetic H4 1–19
residues). (Bottom) Chromatogram showing the total ion counts of acetylated H4 (residues
1–19) peptide after reaction with hnRNPA2. The X-axis represents the
liquid chromatography running time and the Y-axis represents the ion counts.
(Bottom panel) The peak in the top panel was highlighted to generate the TOF-MS bottom
panel. (c) (Top) Domain architecture of hnRNPA2. (Bottom) KAT activity of ×6
His-HnRNPA2 (full-length), RNA binding domain (RBD) (residues 1–180) and
glycine-rich domain (residues 180–341) assessed by filter-binding assay using
14C acetyl-CoA and H4 peptide (residues 1–19) as substrates.
(d) Inhibition of H4 acetylation by hnRNPA2 (full-length and RBD) using
14C acetyl-CoA in the presence of 100 μm synthetic
KAT inhibitors (as indicated). (e) Proposed model for acetyl-CoA binding by
hnRNPA2. A homology model of hnRNPA2 based on the hnRNPA1 structure (gray) with
acetyl-CoA docked (green; see ‘Materials and Methods’ section) suggests
that the adenosine base is sandwiched between two aromatic residues (H96 and F12;
magenta), whereas additional interactions are established with Arg 48 and Arg 50
(magenta). (f) KAT activity of the purified full-length hnRNPA2 WT and R48T and
R50T mutants using 14C Acetyl-CoA and H4 peptide (residues 1–19) as
substrates. For LTK14, garcinol and isogarcinol DMSO alone was used in control assays
run alongside.
HnRNPA2 binds to acetyl-CoA in a self-catalyzed reaction and is autoacetylated. In a
filter-binding assay, we found that in the presence of excess 3H acetyl-CoA
(50 μm), hnRNPA2 underwent autoacetylation (Supplementary Figure S2E). Extensive hnRNPA2 autoacetylation, which
increased with increasing enzyme and acetyl-CoA concentrations, was evident from the
highly immunoreactive bands of the acetyl lysine antibody (Supplementary Figure S2F). Similar to p300, MOF and Rtt109, autoacetylation
of hnRNPA2 possibly augments its KAT activity by conformational changes following
autoacetylation [29-33].
We previously reported that MtRS activation of hnRNPA2 involves Akt-mediated
phosphorylation of hnRNPA2 at Thr98 and Ser219, which is essential for the
former’s transcriptional coactivator function [21]. Therefore, we assessed the effect of Akt phosphorylation on the hnRNPA2KAT activity. In vitro phosphorylation of hnRNPA2 by Akt enhanced its intrinsic
KAT activity by ~2.5-fold over its non-phosphorylated state (Figure
3a). In addition, Akt phosphorylation site mutant hnRNPA2 proteins (T98A and
S219A) showed ~40–50% reduced KAT activity (Supplementary
Figure S2I) confirming that Akt-mediated phosphorylation is important for
hnRNPA2KAT activity. This is reminiscent of p300 where Akt-mediated phosphorylation is
necessary for its KAT activity and transcriptional coactivator function [34].The in vitro acetylation of H4 was further confirmed by LC/MS analysis of a
synthetic H4 peptide (residues 1–19) (Figure 3b). The
MS-TOF patterns presented in Figure 3b show that the H4
peptide was acetylated only in the presence of hnRNPA2 and the peptide alone did not
show any detectable acetylation. Importantly, the KAT activity was unique to hnRNPA2, as
hnRNPA1, a close relative of hnRNPA2 did not show this KAT activity (Supplementary Figure S2G). Notably, only hnRNPA2, but not hnRNPA1 was
induced in PmtDNA-depleted cells (Supplementary Figure
S2H).To identify the regions of hnRNPA2 critical for its KAT function, we expressed a series
of deletion constructs in E. coli and purified the recombinant His-tagged proteins
(Coomassie Blue Staining for purified protein profile shown in Supplementary Figure S2C). The RBD of hnRNPA2 (residues 1–180) showed
KAT activity comparable with the full-length protein in vitro, whereas the
C-terminal glycine-rich domain (residues 180–341) showed no appreciable KAT
activity with same molar amounts of protein (Figure 3c).We tested the effects of an array of synthetic KAT inhibitors on hnRNPA2KAT activity,
including garcinol and garcinol derivatives (isogarcinol and LTK14) and
hydrazinocurcumin CTK7A [35,36]. The KAT activity of hnRNPA2 was markedly inhibited by all four
inhibitors (Figure 3d). A substantial inhibition of KAT
activity by CTK7A suggests that hnRNPA2 possibly shares significant structural and/or
catalytic center homologies with other KATs, particularly p300. The inhibition was dose
dependent, and lower doses of 25 μm (data not shown) and
50 μm also showed inhibition (Supplementary
Figure S2J).
Histone H4 acetylation is mediated by RBD of hnRNPA2
Previously, we reported that the RBD of hnRNPA2 is sufficient for its function as a
transcriptional coactivator of stress-target genes [19].
Currently, there is very little information about the structure of hnRNPA2 or its mode
of interaction with RNA. To gain insight into the potential mechanism by which hnRNPA2
binds acetyl-CoA, a structural model of the RBDs of hnRNPA2 was generated using AMBER
(see ‘Materials and Methods’ section). In the resulting model of the
hnRNPA2: acetyl-CoA complex, the adenosine ring of acetyl-CoA (Figure
3e) is stabilized by π-stacking interactions with His 96 and
Phe 12, whereas Arg 50 forms a hydrogen bond with the 5′-phosphate and Arg 48
participates in a bidentate hydrogen bond with two oxygen molecules of the pantothenate
moiety. The RBDs of hnRNPA2 and hnRNPA1 are highly conserved, and the binding mode of
hnRNPA2 and acetyl-CoA is analogous to that of adenine in the crystal structure of
hnRNPA1 in complex with ssDNA (Figure 3e). The same binding
residues appear to be conserved in hnRNPA2, suggesting that the conserved RBD has been
repurposed to bind acetyl-CoA.To test the proposed 3D model, we generated hnRNPA2 mutant proteins in which Arg
residues were mutated either individually (R48T or R50T) or simultaneously (R48T/R50T)
(coomassie blue staining for purified protein profile shown in Supplementary Figure S2C). The R48T/R50T double mutant exhibited only 10% of
the KAT activity of the WT protein, whereas the R48T and R50T single mutants retained
25% and 50% of the KAT activity, respectively (Figure 3f).
These results validated our structural prediction for acetyl-CoA binding, which also
appears to be critical for KAT activity.
HnRNPA2 acetylates histone H4 at K8 on target gene promoters
Lysine residues 5, 8, 12 and 16 of H4 are the principal sites of KAT-mediated
acetylation [37] and are linked to transcription
activation in vivo. LC–MS/MS analysis of H4 peptide (residues
1–19) in an in vitro acetylation reaction using acetyl-CoA and hnRNPA2,
indicated that hnRNPA2 acetylates Lys 8 (Figure 4a). ChIP
analysis using specific antibodies for H4K8ac at both the MtRS target promoters,
Akt1 (Figure 4b) and Cathepsin L
(Supplementary Figure S3A) showed marked enrichment of H4
acetylation at Lys 8 in PmtDNA-depl cells, which was markedly reduced in
PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh and reverted cells. At both Akt1 and cathepsin L
promoters, there was no preferential enrichment of H4K5 acetylation (data not shown),
which further supports the possibility of K8 of H4 being the primary target site of
hnRNPA2.
Figure 4
Site specificity of hnRNPA2-mediated H4 acetylation. (a) Identification of
hnRNPA2-specific H4 acetylation sites by LC–MS/MS. The MS/MS spectrum of peptide
1SGRGKGGKACGLGKGGAKRHR19 confirms K8 acetylation. (i)
Y-ion products. The peak at m/z 653.41 (labeled Y-12) corresponds to
acetyl lysine; (ii) b-ion products. The peak at m/z 812.45 (labeled
b-8) corresponds to acetyl lysine. (b) ChIP assay showing enrichment of H4K8
acetylation at the Akt1 promoter in control, PmtDNA-depl, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh
and reverted C2C12 cells. Antibodies specific to H4K8Ac, was used for
immunoprecipitation. Rabbit IgG and H4K5ac antibody were used as negative antibody
controls and β-actin promoter was used as a negative control for promoter DNA
region (Supplementary Figure S3A–C). Data are
represented as mean±s.d. (c) Immunohistochemistry of serial sections of
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from two representative patient samples stained with
either acetyl-H4K8 or hnRNPA2 antibody as indicated in the figure and described in
Supplementary Information. The * shows stained tumor cells
and the red arrows indicate the stroma. Patient case numbers are indicated in the
figure.
Previously, we reported that the β-actin promoter is not activated by MtRS
[19]. The absence of selective enrichment of H4K8
acetylation of the β-actin promoter in PmtDNA-depl cells (Supplementary Figure S3C, left panel) further confirms that H4K8 acetylation
is a selective response to MtRS. In addition, intronic regions of Cathepsin L
and Akt1 genes from control and PmtDNA-depl cells didn’t show
differences (Supplementary Figure S3C, right panel).Immunohistochemical analysis of sections from humanesophageal squamous cell carcinomatumors showed that hnRNPA2 is localized at elevated levels in the nuclei of cancer
cells, whereas the level in normal basal cells in the squamous epithelium are
negligible. We observed a tight overlap between immunostaining for H4K8 acetylation and
hnRNPA2 in the nuclei of tumor cells (indicated by *), whereas the stroma (indicated by
red arrows) showed no immunoreactivity to either hnRNPA2 or acetyl-H4K8 antibodies
(Figure 4c). These results confirm that hnRNPA2 and
hnRNPA2-mediated H4K8 acetylation that are components of MtRS are activated in humancancers.To test if the amino acid residues R48 and R50 of hnRNPA2 have a role in H4K8
acetylation, we generated PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cell lines ectopically expressing either
hnRNPA2 WT or mutant proteins (R48T, R50T or R48T/R50T) by introducing degenerate codons
within the shRNA target sites of cDNAs (see ‘Materials and Methods’
section). The immunoblot presented in Figure 5a (inset, top
panel) shows hnRNPA2 protein levels were comparable among cells expressing shRNA rescue
constructs. As expected, we did not observe detectable H4K8 acetylation at the target
gene promoter (Figure 5a) in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells.
Cells reconstituted with the WT hnRNPA2 showed ~40-fold enrichment in H4K8-specific
acetylation promoter DNA, whereas cells reconstituted with the hnRNPA2 mutants (Arg
48/50 T) had undetectable H4K8 acetylation. In these PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells,
rescuing with WT, but not the Arg mutant hnRNPA2 restored H4K8 acetylation at the
stress-target promoters (Figure 5a; Supplementary Figure S3D). These results suggest that Arg 48 and Arg 50
residues are essential for hnRNPA2 functions in modulating histone acetylation in
vivo at the target gene promoters.
Figure 5
Functional role of hnRNPA2 KAT activity in stress-target gene transcription. (a,
b) Involvement of the hnRNPA2 KAT residues in H4 acetylation at Akt1
promoter detected by ChIP assay in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells ectopically expressing
either the pMXs vector alone or hnRNPA2 WT, R48T, R50T and R48T/R50T mutants (Supplementary Figure S3D). Immunoblot (inset) showing similar
expression levels of all hnRNPA2shRNA rescue constructs in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells.
(b) Association of stress-target factor, cRel at the Akt1 promoter in control,
PmtDNA-depl, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh and in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells ectopically
expressing hnRNPA2 WT and KAT mutants. (c) Transcript levels of target genes in
control, PmtDNA-depl, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh and PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh expressing KAT
mutants in C2C12 cells (Supplementary Figures S3D and S4;
Supplementary Table S1). (d) Tert
transcript levels in control, PmtDNA-depl, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh and
PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells expressing WT and KAT mutant cells. Data are represented as
mean±s.d.
HnRNPA2-mediated H4 acetylation is important for its transcription coactivator
function
Overexpression of WT hnRNPA2 in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells resulted in ~fivefold
activation of the Cathepsin L promoter, whereas expression of the KAT domain
mutants (R48T, R50T and R48T/R50T) abrogated this activation (Supplementary Figure S3E). We previously reported that the occupancy of the
stress-activated transcription factor cRel:p50 along with the other factors on the
stress-target gene promoter is essential for target gene activation. Furthermore, this
recruitment of cRel is part of MtRS and dependent on hnRNPA2. Here, we observed that the
recruitment of cRel to the Akt1 promoter was markedly diminished in
PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells expressing the KAT mutants (Figure
5b). We observed that the increased transcription of a panel of previously
reported mitochondrial stress-target genes was dependent on the hnRNPA2KAT activity.
Ectopically expressing WT hnRNPA2 in PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells rescued the transcript
levels to that seen in PmtDNA-depl cells, whereas the target gene transcription was
markedly impaired in cells expressing hnRNPA2KAT mutant proteins (Figure 5c and d).We tested the functional consequences of the KAT activity of hnRNPA2 on the global
oncogene expression pattern using the mousecancer pathway finder RT2
profiler array, which profiles the expression of 84 genes representative of 9 different
biological pathways involved in tumorigenesis (SA Biosciences, Qiagen, Frederick, MD,
USA). The RT2 profiler analysis shows a number of genes involved in oncogenic
processes were altered in PmtDNA-depl C2C12 cells and were affected by hnRNPA2KAT
mutations (Supplementary Table S1; Supplementary Figure S4). In accordance with these observations, the
acquired invasive potential of PmtDNA-depl C2C12 cells was lost in cells expressing
hnRNPA2KAT mutants (Figure 6a). These results establish a
crucial link between hnRNPA2KAT activity and its function as a transcriptional
coactivator in response to PmtDNA depletion as outlined in Figure
6b.
Figure 6
HnRNPA2 KAT activity is essential for the mtDNA depletion-induced invasive phenotype.
(a) Matrigel invasion assay in control, PmtDNA-depleted, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh
cells and PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells expressing either WT or KAT mutant hnRNPA2. A
representative image from three independent experiments is presented. (b)
Schematic showing hnRNPA2 acetylates histone H4 at the promoter DNA of the mitochondrial
stress-target genes. Akt activated by MtRS phosphorylates hnRNPA2 and augments its KAT
activity. Histone acetylation by hnRNPA2 provides access to stress-activated
transcription factors NFκB, C/EBPδ, CREB and NFAT to the promoter DNA,
resulting in transcriptional activation of the stress-target genes.
Discussion
Previously, we showed that activation of hnRNPA2 is essential for the propagation of MtRS
and its silencing abrogated stress response, leading to reversal of the invasive and
proliferative phenotype of cells [2, 13–15, 17,
19–21]. Specifically, we showed that
hnRNPA2 acts as a transcription coactivator by binding to the 5′ upstream promoter
sites mostly through protein–protein interaction with other DNA binding
transcription factors. In this study, we show that hnRNPA2 is a novel KAT protein, which
modulates the expression of stress-response genes by H4K8 acetylation at the promoter
sites. We also show that mitochondrial dysfunction in immortalized cells induces
telomerase activation, which probably prevents cells from undergoing senescence. In
addition, expression of Tert and Terc genes are also modulated by
MtRS-activated hnRNPA2.PmtDNA-depl cells appear to evade senescence by MtRS-mediated activation of telomerase.
HnRNPA2 and Akt, two important components of MtRS, have a causal role in transcriptional
upregulation of telomerase components, Tert and Terc. In silico analysis
indeed shows the presence of the four factor binding sites (CREB, NFATc, cRel;p50 and
C/EBPδ) immediately upstream of transcription start sites. These factor binding
foot-prints are similar to those shown for stress-target Akt1 and RyR1
genes (Figure 1). Reactivation of telomerase in PmtDNA-depl
cells is consistent with our previous report [38] showing
that these cells are resistant to apoptosis.The KAT activity of hnRNPA2 is demonstrated by the following criteria: first, purified
recombinant hnRNPA2 and its RBD show KAT activity with both H4 and also with purified
nucleosomes. Second, purified acetyl-CoA binding site mutant hnRNPA2 protein showed
diminished activity in vitro and in vivo in reconstituted cells. Third,
shRNA-mediated knockdown of hnRNPA2 caused diminished H4K8 acetylation followed by low
transcriptional activation of target genes. Finally, in vitro translated hnRNPA2
programmed with WT cDNA showed KAT activity. These results dispel any possibility of a
contaminating protein catalyzing the KAT activity. Finally, the KAT activity of hnRNPA2 is
effectively inhibited by garcinol/isogarcinol and curcumarin derivatives that are known
KAT inhibitors [35, 36].The property of hnRNPA2 as a KAT is similar to other transcriptional coactivators that
remodel chromatin DNA by histone acetylation (Figure 6b).
Interestingly, our observation that Akt phosphorylation augments its histone acetylation
function is in agreement with a recent study showing the requirement for Akt in modulating
histone acetylation status in tumor cells exhibiting metabolic defects [39]. Within the limits of the computational methods used to derive
the common structural elements between the adenine moiety of DNA and acetyl-CoA, we
propose a structural model for the binding of acetyl-CoA to hnRNPA2 (Figure 3e). This model also relies on the single strand DNA/RNA binding mode
of the highly similar hnRNPA1 protein. Importantly, despite the high conservation of RBDs,
hnRNPA1 did not show any measurable KAT activity (Supplementary Figure
S2G). It is likely that the more variable sequence region of hnRNPA2, upstream
of the RBD is necessary for the KAT activity. Interestingly, our data show that
substitutions at Arg 48 and Arg 50 residues result in a loss of histone acetylation
function of hnRNPA2. It could be argued that hnRNPA2 is a chaperone protein and modulates
histone acetylation by recruiting other acetyltransferase(s) as shown for PGC-1α
[40]. It must be noted however that promoter pull-down
analysis using mitochondrial stress-target gene promoters did not detect any other known
KAT proteins [19]. Our findings on the increased
hnRNPA2-mediated histone acetylation under mitochondrial stress conditions are in
agreement with previous reports showing increased global histone acetylation in
mtDNA-depleted cells, or cells carrying heteroplasmic mutations [41, 42]. Although not shown, partial mtDNA
depletion as used in this study either by chemical (EtBr) or genetic (TFAM shRNA
expression) approaches do not diminish cellular Acetyl-CoA levels. Instead, Acetyl-CoA
levels are increased modestly or significantly in these cells, supporting increased
acetylation.Others and we have shown that mitochondrial stress induces global alterations in nuclear
gene expression pattern [41-44],
and increased histone acetylation by altered metabolism and increased NADH pool [45-47]. Here, we provide a mechanistic link
mediated via hnRNPA2 demonstrating that MtRS regulates epigenetic events, by histone
acetylation on the target genes. These findings are particularly significant in the
context of cancer progression where reduction in MtDNA copy number has been widely
observed in tumors. Moreover, hnRNPA2 modulates different aspects of cancer cell
metabolism, invasion and cancer progression by alternative splicing and transcriptional
activation of oncogenes [22, 23, 48–50], and this study
suggests that hnRNPA2 possibly has a global role in gene activation by epigenetic
modifications. Our findings highlight the significance of mitochondrial
dysfunction-induced MtRS as a common epigenetic link for nuclear gene expression, which
may be important in cancer and other pathologies.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines
Murine skeletal myoblasts C2C12 cells were purchased from ATCC (CRL 1772) and cultured
in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum. MtDNA was partially depleted (70%) using ethidium
bromide (100 ng ml−1) or 2,3′-dideoxycytidine
(ddC; 10 μm, 120 h) or Tfam shRNA as previously
described [2, 14]. EtBr and
ddC were washed out from the cell growth medium for at least 2–3 passages before
being used for experiments. These chemicals were not present when the experiments were
performed. In both methods (Tfam shRNA or EtBR treatment), we have used about 80% mtDNA
depletion as the starting point. MtDNA-depleted C2C12 cells were supplemented with
1 mm pyruvate and 50 μg ml−1
uridine. Reverted cells represent PmtDNA-depleted cells grown subsequently for 30
passages in the absence of EtBr, for reversing the MtDNA content to 80% of control
cells.Three independent shRNA constructs targeting hnRNPA2 were validated in preliminary
transient transfection experiments as previously described [19]. MtDNA-depleted C2C12 cells stably expressing either hnRNPA2 or GFP
(negative control) shRNA (cloned in pLKO.1 vector) were generated. Over 85% of the
hnRNPA2 mRNA and protein has been silenced. For hnRNPA2 rescue experiments in C2C12
cells, the hnRNPA2 mutant constructs used in this study were subcloned in pMXs vector
(kind gift from Russ Carstens, UPENN) by Gene Pass (Nashville, TN, USA). HnRNPA2shRNA
rescue cell lines were generated by ectopically expressing hnRNPA2 with conservative
mutations in the shRNA target regions. For generation of stably expressing shRNA rescue
hnRNPA2KAT mutants, PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh expressing cells were transduced with either
pMXS-IRES- Puro- EGFP empty vector or KAT mutant cDNAs. Rescue of hnRNPA2 expression in
PmtDNA-depl/hnRNPA2sh cells was confirmed by western immunoblot.Five shRNA constructs were used for Tfam and three shRNA constructs were used
for hnRNPA2. ShRNA targeting GFP was used as control. For Tfam silencing experiments,
Tfam and GFP shRNAs cloned in pLKO.1 lentiviral vectors were used. Five independent Tfam
shRNA constructs were used for the initial screening experiments. Cells were transduced
using 48 and 72 h viral supernatant and shRNA expressing cells were selected by
puromycin (2 μg ml−1) selection for about five
cell passages. After antibiotic selection, Tfam mRNA levels were reduced by 80% and
depending on the cell type, it required another 5–7 passages for mtDNA content to
be reduced by 80%. Cells expressing Tfam shRNA were maintained in medium with added
uridine (50 μg ml−1) and sodium pyruvate
(1 mm).
Plasmids
Full-length HnRNPA2 (human) cDNA cloned in pET 28a (+) vector with N-terminal ×6
His tag was a gift from Gideon Dreyfuss (University of Pennsylvania). RBD (residues
1–180) and glycine-rich domain (residues 180–341) were PCR amplified and
cloned in the same vector. Full-length ×6 His-hnRNPA2/ pET 28a(+) with Arg 48, Arg
50 mutations and ×6-hnRNPA2-RBD/pET 28a(+) with Phe 12 and His 96 mutations were
generated using the Quick Change Lightning site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent
technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).
Expression and affinity purification of His-hnRNPA2
Full-length and mutant hnRNPA2 cDNAs cloned in pET 28a(+) bacterial expression vector,
were transformed in BL21 bacterial cells. Protein expression was induced by treating
10 l of exponentially growing culture with 1 mm isopropyl
thiogalactoside (IPTG) for 3 h at 30 °C. After incubation bacteria
was lysed by sonication in buffer containing 50 mm
NaH2PO4, 500 mm NaCl, 5% glycerol,
50 mm imidazole, pH 8 in the presence of lysozyme
(1 mg ml−1) and DNase I
(5 μg ml−1). The lysate was clarified by
centrifugation at 14 000 r.p.m. for 20 min at 4 °C.
His-tagged proteins were purified from the clarified lysates in two steps using a
combination of Nickel affinity chromatography and ion exchange chromatography on an AKTA
FPLC system. In the first step, the lysate was loaded on a HisTrap FF column (GE)
pre-equilibrated with binding buffer (500 mm NaCl,
50 mm imidazole, 10% glycerol, pH 8). His-tagged proteins were
eluted using a linear gradient of 0–100% elution buffer (500 mm
NaCl, 500 mm imidazole, 10% glycerol, pH 8) at a flow rate of
0.5 ml min−1. Fractions containing hnRNPA2 from this
step were pooled and dialyzed to remove imidazole and change buffer for ion exchange
chromatography using Centricon concentrators. Full-length hnRNPA2 was further purified
on a MonoS column, whereas RBD was purified on MonoQ column. The equilibration buffer
was 20 mm sodium phosphate (pH 8). Elution was carried out at flow
rate of 1 ml min−1 using a linear gradient of
0–100% elution buffer. Elution was carried out at flow rate
1 ml min−1 using a linear gradient of 0–100%
elution buffer (20 mm sodium phosphate, pH 8 and 1m NaCl).
HnRNPA2 fractions were dialyzed, concentrated and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen before
storing at −80 °C. The protein yield from a 10 l bacterial
culture was ~25 mg. Interestingly, similar to other HAT proteins recombinant
hnRNPA2 was highly toxic to E. coli, which could account for the low yield of
the full-length protein besause of indiscriminate acetylation of host proteins.
Quantification of MtDNA
Analysis of MtDNA content from cellular total DNA was performed using real time qPCR as
described before [14]. Copy number of MtDNA coded gene
(CcO I) was normalized to nuclear single copy gene (CcO IVi1).
Invitro kinase assay
The in vitro kinase assay was carried out as detailed previously [21]. A total of 0.1 μg of Recombinant Akt
(Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C
with purified His-hnRNPA2 (0.5 μg) in a buffer containing
10 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), 1 mm MgCl2 and
1 mm MnCl2 in the presence of 10 μCi
[γ-32 P]ATP.
KAT assays
Filter-binding KAT assays were performed as previously described [51]. Affinity-purified recombinant hnRNPA2 proteins
(100 nm) were incubated at 30 °C for 20 min with
either 50 μm synthetic histone amino terminal peptides H4
(residues 1–19; active motif) or 5 μg of HeLa mononucleosomes
(EpiCypher, The Woodlands, TX, USA, Cat#16-0002) in the presence of either
50 μm
14C acetyl-CoA (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in a
30 μl reaction volume. Reaction products were spotted on P-81 filters
(Whatman), air-dried and washed extensively in 0.2m sodium carbonate buffer
and scintillation counts were taken.For the KAT assays with the inhibitors, CTK7A is a water soluble compound and LTK14,
garcinol and isogarcinol are solubilized in DMSO. DMSO alone was used in control assays
run alongside. Notably, DMSO alone did not show any effect on the HAT activity of
hnRNPA2 protein (data not shown).
Identification of lysine acetylation by LC–MS/MS analysis
LC–MS/MS was carried out to detect H4 acetylation by hnRNPA2. Briefly, HAT
reaction for identifying acetylation site LC–MS/MS was carried out as detailed
above. The reverse-phase nanobore liquid chromatography was performed on an Agilent LC
1100 (Agilent) fitted with an auto sampler (G1377A), a cap pump (G1376A), a nano pump
(G2225A) and a 1100 control module (G1323) that was connected to a NanoSpray QSTAR-XL
mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Briefly,
4 μl of acetylation reaction mixture was loaded onto the Precolumn,
ZORBOX300SB C18 column (0.3×5 mm) and washed with formic acid/H2O
(0.1/99.9, by v/v) at a flow rate of 5 μl min−1
(capillary pump). The eluent was transferred to the separation column, ZORBOX C18 column
(0.075×150 mm) from Agilent. Gradient elution (flow rate:
0.3 μl min−1) from this column consisted of a
5 min initial isocratic elution with 0% B, a linear gradient 0–70% B in
35 min, a 10 min isocratic elution 70% B and a linear gradient
70–0% B in 5 min. The eluent was directly introduced into NanoSpray
QSTAR-XL mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex). Spray capillary was a PicoTip
emitter with ID 15 μm (New Objective, Woburn, MA, USA). The MS instrument
was operated with the following setting: curtain gas
20 l min−1, spray voltage 2.5 kV, declustering
potential 60 V, focusing potential 220 V, collision gas
5 l min−1 and collision energy optimized
automatically. TOF-MS and TOF-MS/MS spectra were acquired in the information dependent
acquisition method performed with Analyst QS1.1 software provided by Applied
Biosystems/MDS Sciex. Sequencing analysis was done by manual method based on Bioanalyst
Software 1.1.5 de novo peptide sequencing provided by Applied Biosystems/MDS
Sciex.
Modeling of hnRNPA2 in complex with acetyl-CoA
The hnRNPA2 model has a basic groove postulated to bind acetyl-CoA (green), with a
clear binding pocket that accommodates the adenosine ring and specific hydrogen bond
interactions with Arg 48 and Arg 50 [51]. The
electrostatic surface potential map was generated with the Delphi software package24 and
is colored from −7 kTe-1 (blue) to +7kTe-1 (red)The protein sequence corresponding to the RBD of hnRNPA2 was submitted to the Phyre2
server [PMID 19247286]. Phyre2 uses the hidden Markov method to generate alignments of a
submitted protein sequence against proteins with structures available in the Protein
Data Bank [PMID 15531603]. The resulting alignments are then used to produce a
homology-based model of the query sequence to predict its three-dimensional structure.
The model is scored as accurate when over 90% of the submitted residues are modeled at
greater than 90% confidence [PMID 19247286]. The resulting model for the RBD of hnRNPA2
was then used in flexible docking of acetyl-CoA. A docking calculation is a
computational search for the binding conformations or poses of a given ligand that have
the highest complementarity to the protein surface and lowest calculated energy score
using an interaction force field that includes van der Waals and electrostatic terms.
UCSF DOCK utilizes the ‘anchor and grow’ method, whereby a scaffold or
anchor component of the ligand is identified and then rotatable bonds are searched and
added on during the growth phase [PMID: 19369428]. Docking spheres for hnRNPA2 were
generated using all surface points, with maximum and minimum sphere radii of 4 Å
and 1.4 Å, respectively. An energy grid with 0.3 Å spacing was
calculated, using attractive and repulsive exponents of 6 and 9, respectively. A
dielectric factor of 4 and a bump overlap of 0.75 Å was utilized. The
acetyl-CoA molecule was charged using AmberTools and all docking calculations were
performed with UCSF DOCK [PMID: 19369428]. The final docked pose for acetyl-CoA had a
total grid score of −81.9 kcal mol−1 with the
electrostatic and van der Waals components being −70.5
kcal mol−1 and
−11.4 kcal mol−1, respectively.
ChIP analysis
ChIP assays were performed as previously described [19].
Immunoprecipitation of cross linked chromatin–protein complexes were carried out
using following antibodies: anti-hnRNPA2 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA),
anti-hyperacetylated H4 histone, anti-acetylated histone H4 at lysine 8 or 5 (Upstate
Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY, USA). Real time PCR analysis was done using primer sets
to Cathepsin L, RyR1 and Akt1 promoters. Rabbit preimmune serum, H4K5ac antibody were
used as negative antibody controls and β-actin promoter, which is non-responsive
to mitochondrial stress, was used as a negative control for promoter DNA region. ChIP
values were normalized to either the total input DNA or total histone H4 levels, as
indicated in figures, to adjust for differences in chromatin DNA or total H4 levels.
Real time PCR were carried out in triplicates from at least three independent
experiments.
Matrigel invasion assay
In vitro invasion assays were carried out as described before [19]. Cells (5×104) in growth medium were seeded
on a Matrigel-coated Boyden chamber. After 24 h, cells that invaded the Matrigel
were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and observed under bright field microscope.
Cellular respiration
Oxygen consumption and extracellular rate of acidification was carried out in a XF24
Seahorse Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, Billerica, MA, USA) using 5×104
cells. For assessing ATP-coupled respiration, Oligomycin
(2 μg ml−1), DNP (75 μm)
and Rotenone (1 μm) were added sequentially.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostaining of humanesophageal cancer sections was done using Vectastain ABC kit
(Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s
instructions. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized and incubated in blocking buffer for
1 h at 37 °C. Incubation with primary antibodies (acetylated-H4K8 or
hnRNPA2) was carried out overnight at 4 °C. Biotinylated secondary IgG
incubation was then carried out at 37 °C and the signal was developed using
the DAP peroxidase staining kit (Vector laboratories).
Statistical analysis
All data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Statistical
significance was determined using student’s t-test. P-values
<0.05 (*) and ⩽0.005 (**) were considered statistically significant, and
P-values <0.001 (***) were highly significant.
Authors: R Magnus N Friis; John Paul Glaves; Tao Huan; Liang Li; Brian D Sykes; Michael C Schultz Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Y Torosyan; A Dobi; M Glasman; K Mezhevaya; S Naga; W Huang; C Paweletz; X Leighton; H B Pollard; M Srivastava Journal: Oncogene Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Joyce V Lee; Alessandro Carrer; Supriya Shah; Nathaniel W Snyder; Shuanzeng Wei; Sriram Venneti; Andrew J Worth; Zuo-Fei Yuan; Hee-Woong Lim; Shichong Liu; Ellen Jackson; Nicole M Aiello; Naomi B Haas; Timothy R Rebbeck; Alexander Judkins; Kyoung-Jae Won; Lewis A Chodosh; Benjamin A Garcia; Ben Z Stanger; Michael D Feldman; Ian A Blair; Kathryn E Wellen Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: G Biswas; O A Adebanjo; B D Freedman; H K Anandatheerthavarada; C Vijayasarathy; M Zaidi; M Kotlikoff; N G Avadhani Journal: EMBO J Date: 1999-02-01 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Christina A Castellani; Ryan J Longchamps; Jing Sun; Eliseo Guallar; Dan E Arking Journal: Mitochondrion Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Manti Guha; Satish Srinivasan; Maura M Sheehan; Takashi Kijima; Gordon Ruthel; Kelly Whelan; Koji Tanaka; Andres Klein-Szanto; Prasanna M Chandramouleeswaran; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Narayan G Avadhani Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2019-10-22