Literature DB >> 27982201

Incidence and prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas: retrospective cohort study in a Health Management Organization in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Patricia Fainstein Day1, Monica Graciela Loto1, Mariela Glerean1, María Fabiana Russo Picasso1, Soledad Lovazzano1, Diego Hernán Giunta2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence rate and prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas (PAs) within the Hospital Italiano Medical Care Program (HIMCP), a well-defined population of 150,000 members living in the urban and suburban area of the city of Buenos Aires. We defined clinically relevant PAs as those associated with endocrine dysfunction and/or mass effect. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective open cohort study was conducted, including all members of the HIMCP over 18 years old, with active memberships during the period of the study, from January 1st 2003, to January 1, 2014. The incidence rates (IRs) were standardized (SIR) to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2000 standard population and were expressed per 100,000 members/year. Prevalence was estimated at January 1, 2014, and was expressed per 100,000 persons. The clinical records have been electronically managed since 2001. All lab and imaging studies were done in-house.
RESULTS: The overall SIR was 7.39/100,000/year (95% CI 4.47-10.31). Female patients had a specific IR significantly higher than male patients (5.85 vs.1.54) and represented 73% of the affected members. Regarding tumor size, 61.4% were microadenomas, and the mean age at diagnosis was 46.4 years. Prolactinomas had the highest SIR (5.41), followed by acromegaly (Acro) and non-functioning adenomas (NFAs) with overlapping 95% CIs (0.44-1.41 and 0.31-0.99, respectively). Microprolactinomas were more frequent in female (72.6%) (p < 0.01) and younger members (38 vs.60 years; p < 0.04). The overall prevalence rate was 97.76/100,000. Prolactinomas had the highest prevalence (56.29), followed by NFAs (21.48), Acro (14.07) and CD (5.93).
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that clinically relevant PAs are more common than usually suspected, especially prolactinomas and growth-hormone secreting PAs. These data highlight the need to increase the awareness of PAs, thereby enabling early diagnosis and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27982201     DOI: 10.1590/2359-3997000000195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 2359-3997            Impact factor:   2.309


  34 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a review on the new pathological classification, management guidelines and treatment options.

Authors:  P D Delgado-López; J Pi-Barrio; M T Dueñas-Polo; M Pascual-Llorente; M C Gordón-Bolaños
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients Presenting with Preoperative Visual Deficits.

Authors:  Felipe Fredes; Gabriel Undurraga; Pablo Rojas; Felipe Constanzo; Carolina Lazcano; Jaime Pinto; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-07-19

Review 3.  Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Georgia Ntali; John A Wass
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): A surgical perspective.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Gianluca Nocera; Francesca Roncelli; Marco Losa; Anna Maria Formenti; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Knockdown of long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 inhibits growth and promotes apoptosis in pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Hengxin Tang; Bo Hou; Zhuopeng Ye; Cong Ling; Ying Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Postoperative complications and quality of life in patients with pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Jiajia Zhang; Ya Wang; Xiuqun Xu; Yudan Gu; Fei Huang; Min Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

7.  DNA damage and growth hormone hypersecretion in pituitary somatotroph adenomas.

Authors:  Anat Ben-Shlomo; Nan Deng; Evelyn Ding; Masaaki Yamamoto; Adam Mamelak; Vera Chesnokova; Artak Labadzhyan; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Body Habitus Across the Lifespan and Risk of Pituitary Adenoma.

Authors:  David J Cote; Timothy R Smith; Ursula B Kaiser; Edward R Laws; Meir J Stampfer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Do TRIB1 and IL-9 Gene Polymorphisms Impact the Development and Manifestation of Pituitary Adenoma?

Authors:  Tomas Mickevicius; Alvita Vilkeviciute; Brigita Glebauskiene; Loresa Kriauciuniene; Rasa Liutkeviciene
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  TBX15 rs98422, DNM3 rs1011731, RAD51B rs8017304, and rs2588809 Gene Polymorphisms and Associations With Pituitary Adenoma.

Authors:  Gabija JuknytĖ; Inga LaurinaitytĖ; Alvita VilkeviČiŪtĖ; Greta GedvilaitĖ; Brigita GlebauskienĖ; Loresa KriauČiŪnienĖ; Rasa LiutkeviČienĖ
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.