Literature DB >> 2798023

Effects of room reflectance and background noise on perceived auditory distance.

D H Mershon1, W L Ballenger, A D Little, P L McMurtry, J L Buchanan.   

Abstract

Perceptions of egocentric auditory distance were investigated within an environment for which the reverberation time could be systematically varied without changes in the size or shape of the room. Two levels of wide-band background noise, differing by 20 dB, were used as a masking stimulus. Target sounds were presented from distances between 0.75 and 6.0 m and verbal reports of distance were collected from 288 listeners in two separate experiments. Changes in physical distance produced variation in reported distance in each configuration. Reported distance was generally proportional to real distance, but considerably underestimated when room reflectance was low. When room reflectance was high (T60 approximately 1.7 s for the range of frequencies used), initial reports of distance were often overestimates; upon repeated presentation, judgments in the high reflectance room became more nearly veridical. The effect of increasing the background noise level was to decrease the perceived distance. These findings are in accord with expectations based upon the importance of reverberation cue(s) to distance and upon previous analyses from this laboratory.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2798023     DOI: 10.1068/p180403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Nandini Iyer; Charissa R Lansing; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Azimuth and envelope coding in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effect of reverberation and distance.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Near-field discrimination of sound source distance in the rabbit.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Duck O Kim; Kelly-Jo Koch; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-17

6.  Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Matthew A Timmis; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory/visual distance estimation: accuracy and variability.

Authors:  Paul W Anderson; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-07

8.  Brain dynamics that correlate with effects of learning on auditory distance perception.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Klaus Gramann; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Auditory-cortex short-term plasticity induced by selective attention.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.