Literature DB >> 25595542

Near-field discrimination of sound source distance in the rabbit.

Shigeyuki Kuwada1, Duck O Kim, Kelly-Jo Koch, Kristina S Abrams, Fabio Idrobo, Pavel Zahorik, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

The acoustical cues and physiological processing mechanisms underlying the perception of the distance of sound sources are not well understood. To understand the relation between physiology and behavior, a first step is to use an animal model to study distance sensitivity. The goal of these experiments was to establish the capacity of the Dutch-belted rabbit to discriminate between sound sources at two distances. Trains of noise bursts were presented from speakers that were located either directly in front of the rabbit or at a 45 ° angle in azimuth. The reference speaker was positioned at distances of 20, 40, and 60 cm from the subject, and the more distant test speaker was systematically moved to determine the smallest difference in distance that could be reliably discriminated by the subject. Noise stimuli had one of three bandwidths: wideband (0.1-10 kHz), low-pass (0.1-3 kHz), or high-pass (3-10 kHz). The mean stimulus level was 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at the location of the rabbit's head, and the level was roved over a 12-dB range from trial to trial to reduce the availability of level cues. An operant one-interval two-alternative non-forced choice task was used, with a blocked two-down-one-up tracking procedure to determine the distance discriminability. Rabbits were consistently able to discriminate two distances when they were sufficiently separated. Sensitivity was better when the reference distance was 60 cm at either azimuth (distance ratio = 1.5) and was worse when the reference distance was 20 cm (distance ratio = 2.4 at 0 ° and 1.75 at 45 °).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595542      PMCID: PMC4368658          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0505-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  25 in total

1.  Auditory localization of nearby sources. Head-related transfer functions.

Authors:  D S Brungart; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory localization of nearby sources. II. Localization of a broadband source.

Authors:  D S Brungart; N I Durlach; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Neuronal representations of distance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Chinmayi Tengshe; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The sound source distance dependence of the acoustical cues to location and their encoding by neurons in the inferior colliculus: implications for the Duplex theory.

Authors:  Heath G Jones; Kanthaiah Koka; Jennifer Thornton; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Acoustic cues underlying auditory distance in barn owls.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Andrew Moiseff; J Bradley Turner; Justin Gull
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatially selective auditory responses in the superior colliculus of the echolocating bat.

Authors:  D E Valentine; C F Moss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Azimuth and envelope coding in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effect of reverberation and distance.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Acoustic cues for sound source distance and azimuth in rabbits, a racquetball and a rigid spherical model.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Brian Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.