Literature DB >> 27966524

Directional interlayer spin-valley transfer in two-dimensional heterostructures.

John R Schaibley1, Pasqual Rivera1, Hongyi Yu2, Kyle L Seyler1, Jiaqiang Yan3,4, David G Mandrus3,4,5, Takashi Taniguchi6, Kenji Watanabe6, Wang Yao2, Xiaodong Xu1,7.   

Abstract

Van der Waals heterostructures formed by two different monolayer semiconductors have emerged as a promising platform for new optoelectronic and spin/valleytronic applications. In addition to its atomically thin nature, a two-dimensional semiconductor heterostructure is distinct from its three-dimensional counterparts due to the unique coupled spin-valley physics of its constituent monolayers. Here, we report the direct observation that an optically generated spin-valley polarization in one monolayer can be transferred between layers of a two-dimensional MoSe2-WSe2 heterostructure. Using non-degenerate optical circular dichroism spectroscopy, we show that charge transfer between two monolayers conserves spin-valley polarization and is only weakly dependent on the twist angle between layers. Our work points to a new spin-valley pumping scheme in nanoscale devices, provides a fundamental understanding of spin-valley transfer across the two-dimensional interface, and shows the potential use of two-dimensional semiconductors as a spin-valley generator in two-dimensional spin/valleytronic devices for storing and processing information.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27966524      PMCID: PMC5171822          DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


Spin initialization is a crucial operation for spintronic devices which require a net spin polarization for reading, writing and transferring information1. Two-dimensional semiconductors, such as monolayer MoSe2 and WSe2, have recently emerged as a new spin/valleytronic platform2345. Their inversion-asymmetric honeycomb lattice structures give rise to two energy degenerate but inequivalent (+K and −K) momentum-space valleys, forming a pseudospin system analogous to real electron spin6. Due to strong spin-orbit coupling, the valley pseudospin is locked to the real spin orientation6. Since flipping an electron spin requires a simultaneous flip of a valley pseudospin, free carrier spin-valley polarization at the band edge is expected to be robust and long lived, which has recently been measured to be on order of 1–100 ns (refs 7, 8). Large spin-valley polarizations associated with excitons have been generated by circularly polarized light excitation through a valley dependent optical selection rule3691011. However, excitonic spin-valley polarization in a monolayer does not last long compared with free carriers due to the picosecond timescale of the valley exciton depolarization time, which arises from the electron–hole exchange interaction3121314 and the ultrafast decay time of the exciton itself1516. In addition, it is not clear how to exploit a monolayer system as a spin generator to supply optically generated spin-valley polarization to a different physical system. 2D semiconductor heterostructures formed by stacking two monolayers on top of each other can be designed to realize new spin-valley systems with important advantages over individual monolayers. It has been established that WX2–MoX2 (where X=S, Se) heterostructures have a type-II band alignment1718, which leads to ultrafast charge transfer between layers and tunable photodetectors1920. Such spatial separation of electrons and holes suppresses ultrafast electron–hole recombination21222324 and their exchange interaction212223242526, both of which limit the practical application of optical spin-valley orientation in monolayers32728. Very recently, helicity-dependent photoluminescence (PL) measurements of interlayer excitons revealed spin-valley polarization lifetimes exceeding tens of nanoseconds26, showing that the spatial separation of electrons and holes indeed provides a powerful approach towards practical spin-valleytronics. However, interlayer exciton effects were accompanied by complicated electron–hole relaxation pathways and the effect of the twist angle between the two layers25, which complicate the quantitative analysis of spin-valley polarization from the polarization resolved interlayer exciton PL. In addition, interlayer exciton PL studies were limited to small twist angle samples only, because the electron–hole momentum mismatch in large twist angle heterostructures strongly suppresses interlayer exciton light emission. All of these limitations obscured a clear understanding of the unique spin-valley properties of 2D semiconductor heterostructures, especially the transport of spin-valley polarized free carriers across the 2D layer interface. In this work, by applying polarization resolved non-degenerate nonlinear optical spectroscopy, we provide a direct probe of interlayer spin-valley polarization transfer in a model 2D heterostructure with varying twist angles formed by monolayer MoSe2 and WSe2. By optically exciting an intralayer exciton spin-valley polarization in one layer and probing the intralayer neutral and charge excitons in different layers, we demonstrate that the subsequent interlayer charge transfer is directional and conserves spin, that is, spin polarization transfer leads to polarized hole spins in WSe2 and electron spins in MoSe2 (Fig. 1a). We find that the spin-valley polarization transfer has only a weak dependence on twist angles in the heterobilayer. Our results realize directional pumping of spin-valley polarized carrier spins into individual layers of a 2D heterostructure by harnessing the coupled spin-valley physics of the constituent monolayers6.
Figure 1

Interlayer spin-valley physics.

(a) Depiction of the experiment. Spin-valley polarized excitons are resonantly injected in the MoSe2 layer with a polarized laser (red). The hole transfers to the WSe2 layer where its spin-valley polarization is measured with another polarized laser (blue), resonant with the WSe2 excitons. The black arrows depict the real spin of the electrons and holes. (b) Optical microscope image of a MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure (Het.) on SiO2, showing the different sample regions. (c) The 8-band model of the +K and –K valleys for a nearly aligned MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure, showing the valley dependent optical selection rules (σ± for ±K valley) and real spins (black arrows) for electrons and holes. (d) Degenerate DT spectra from different sample regions for a MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure on sapphire, which are normalized and stacked for comparison. The dashed lines correspond to DT/T=0 for each spectrum. Due to the small isolated WSe2 area used in the DT study, the laser beam could not completely avoid the heterobilayer region, which results in the artifact of small positive signal at MoSe2 exciton energy on the WSe2 sample region.

Results

Sample fabrication and electronic structure

The MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructures were fabricated from independently isolated, exfoliated monolayers (see Fig. 1b). To investigate the effect of heterostructure twist angle, we first measured the crystal axes of individual monolayers by polarization resolved and phase-sensitive second-harmonic generation spectroscopy29303132 (see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1). The monolayers were then assembled into heterostructures using a dry transfer stamping technique33 with known twist angle. Results from heterostructures with non-zero twist angels are presented in Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Figs 2 and 3. The sample in the main text has a twist angle near 0°, where the valleys from the different layers are nearly aligned in momentum space (Fig. 1c). The lowest conduction band is located in the MoSe2 and the highest valence band in WSe2. Within each monolayer, σ± circularly polarized light couples to transitions in the ±K valley only. The high quality of our heterostructure was confirmed by observing a strong PL quenching of the intralayer excitons, and the observation of interlayer excitons (see Supplementary Fig. 4), where Coulomb-bound electrons and holes are localized in opposite layers24.

Nonlinear excitonic response of the heterostructure

We first determined the energy position of intralayer excitons by performing energy resolved continuous-wave differential transmission (DT) or differential reflection (DR) spectroscopy34. This is a two beam pump-probe technique which measures the difference of the probe transmission or reflection when the pump is on and off. The experiments in the main text were all performed on the same heterostructure mounted on sapphire. Additional measurements were performed on different heterostructures on SiO2 substrates and are in qualitative agreement with the data presented in the main text (see Supplementary Note 2). The experiments were performed at 30 K, unless otherwise specified. The degenerate DT spectrum of a heterostructure is shown in Fig. 1d with cross-circularly polarized pump and probe. Compared with the DT spectrum from individual monolayers, we see the intralayer exciton resonances in the heterostructure are consistent with the spectral positions of isolated monolayers with a ∼20 meV redshift and broader linewidth. We attribute the ∼20 meV redshift to a reduction in the intralayer exciton bandgaps due to the coupling between layers. The linewidth broadening is attributed to the charge transfer between the layers, which leads to an extra relaxation channel for the intralayer excitons35. The resonance line shapes of the degenerate DT spectrum consist of a pump-induced increase to the probe transmission at high energy and a pump-induced absorption at low energy. Note that the low-energy pump-induced absorption feature is stronger for the MoSe2 layer compared with WSe2. We attribute this difference to the different oscillator strengths of different charged exciton species in each layer (see Supplementary Note 3).

Demonstration of interlayer charge transfer

To establish interlayer carrier transfer, we performed two-colour non-degenerate DR and DT measurements. Both types of measurements were performed on the same sample and the data are qualitatively similar. We use the DT data exclusively in curve fitting to avoid the interference effects that arise from the substrate reflection in the DR measurements. Figure 2a shows the DR spectrum with co-circularly polarized pump and probe, where the pump is resonant with the lower energy MoSe2 exciton at 1.621 eV while the probe laser scans over the WSe2 exciton resonance near 1.68 eV. The green curve shows an enhanced DR response from the heterostructure region. In comparison, the black curve shows the DR response when both pump and probe are focused on an isolated monolayer WSe2 region which shows a negligible DR response when the pump energy is fixed at the MoSe2 exciton resonance. In the heterostructure, since the MoSe2 exciton has lower energy than WSe2, the observed DR response near the WSe2 exciton when pumping the MoSe2 exciton resonance is unlikely from the energy transfer from MoSe2 exciton. Rather, it is a result of charge transfer from MoSe2 to WSe2. Specifically, the hole is transferred from the MoSe2 valence band to the WSe2 valence band due to the type-II band alignment.
Figure 2

Interlayer hole spin-valley polarization transfer.

(a) Non-degenerate DR of a MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure, and an isolated WSe2 region on the sample. When pumping on the lower energy MoSe2 exciton resonance (1.621 eV), there is a strong DR response corresponding to the WSe2 exciton (dark cyan), whereas the isolated WSe2 monolayer shows negligible DR response (black). Co-circularly polarized pump and probe is shown. The insets depict the pump-probe scheme. The pump is shown as a solid red line, and the probe is the dashed blue line. DR data were measured at 50 K. (b) Co- (burgundy) and cross- (green) circularly polarized DT spectra of the WSe2 exciton resonances, when pumping the low-energy MoSe2 exciton resonance at 1.621 eV. The insets show the pump and probe scheme, where the band filling of the WSe2 valence is shown. The line shapes are discussed in the text. (c) Pump-induced CD of the WSe2 exciton resonances when pumping MoSe2 at 1.621 eV. CD highlights the differences between co- and cross-polarized DT responses. As expected, the sign of the CD response flips with probe (or pump) helicity.

Demonstration of interlayer spin-valley polarization transfer

Interlayer spin-valley transfer was then investigated by performing polarization resolved DT experiments which measure the pump-induced circular dichroism (CD). The pump laser polarization and energy were chosen to only excite valley polarized excitons in the MoSe2 layer. The DT spectrum was measured for both co- (burgundy curve) and cross- (green curve) circularly polarized configurations for the probe scanning through the WSe2 excitons (Fig. 2b). The CD can be defined as the difference between the cross- and co-polarized DT spectra for either fixed pump or fixed probe polarization. Both yield similar results. For the convenience of our experimental configuration, we choose to fix the probe helicity while switching the pump helicity, that is, , where the subscript denotes the pump beam, and T is the probe transmission. As shown in Fig. 2c, the sign of the pump-induced CD response reverses for opposite probe helicities. The observed CD demonstrates a valley population imbalance, that is, the creation of spin-valley polarization in WSe2. We attribute this population imbalance to the pumping of polarized hole spins as depicted in Fig. 1a. Circularly polarized excitation resonantly pumps spin-valley polarized excitons in the MoSe2 layer, about 60 meV below the WSe2 exciton energy. The spin polarized hole then transfers to the WSe2 +K valence band, which gives rise to hole spin-valley polarization in WSe2 and electron spin-valley polarization in MoSe2. The observation of the CD response supports this picture. We also demonstrate electron spin transfer from the WSe2 to the MoSe2 layer by resonantly pumping a WSe2 spin-valley polarization and probing the MoSe2 excitons (Fig. 3). Similar phenomena, including the pump-induced CD is observed, whose sign depends on probe helicity. Since the WSe2 exciton has higher energy than MoSe2, the observed CD will have two contributions. One is due to the electron spin transfer from the WSe2 to the MoSe2 conduction band. The other is from the above resonance optical excitation of valley-polarized excitons directly in the MoSe2. To distinguish these two effects, we measured the DR response on the heterostructure when pumping at the WSe2 resonance, and then repeated the measurement on the isolated monolayer MoSe2 region of the same sample (Supplementary Fig. 5). We observe a threefold enhancement of the DR response on the heterostructure region, which shows that electron transfer from the WSe2 to the MoSe2 dominates the DR response. We note that since the electron and hole spin are separated in opposite layers, the exchange interaction between the electron and hole spins is strongly suppressed. This will give rise to a long polarization lifetime26 and contributes to the enhanced DR response.
Figure 3

Interlayer electron spin-valley polarization transfer.

(a) Co- (burgundy) and cross- (green) circularly polarized DT spectra of the MoSe2 exciton resonances, when pumping the higher energy WSe2 exciton resonance at 1.710 eV. The insets show the pump and probe scheme, where the pump is the solid blue line, and the probe is the dashed red line. Following the interlayer transfer of photo-excited electrons from WSe2 to MoSe2, spin-valley polarized electrons are pumped into the MoSe2 layer. The band filling of the MoSe2 conduction band is shown. (b) The pump-induced CD of the MoSe2 exciton resonances when pumping WSe2 at 1.710 eV flips sign with probe (or pump) helicity. (c–f) Theoretical explanations of the DT line shapes. (c,d) For co-polarized pump and probe, the polarized electrons populate the same valley that the probe measures. The dominant effect is a band filling effect, so that when the pump is on (orange curve in c), the resonance is blue shifted and the exciton absorption is partially saturated, relative to the pump off case (blue dashed curve in c). In this co-polarized configuration, a charged exciton cannot form due to Pauli blocking. (e,f) For cross-polarized pump and probe, the polarized electrons populate the opposite valley that the probe measures. The dominant effect is charged exciton (X-) formation, so that when the pump is on (orange curve in e), the transmission is decreased at the X- resonance, and increased at the neutral exciton (Xo) resonance, relative to the pump off case (blue dashed curve in e). The insets of c,e show the difference between the modelled pump on (orange) and pump off (blue dashed) curves, corresponding to the theoretical DT spectra.

Origin of the DT line shapes

We now turn to the discussion of the line shapes in the non-degenerate DT measurements (Figs 2b and 3a), which further support the picture of directional spin transfer. For simplicity, we focus on the explanation of data in Fig. 3a. Figure 3c–f illustrate the origins of the line shapes by pumping at the WSe2 exciton resonance while probing the MoSe2 excitons. The DT spectra can be understood by taking the difference between the probe transmission spectrum with the pump on and off (solid orange and dashed blue curve of Fig. 3c,e). The co-polarized pump and probe (burgundy data) laser configuration is shown in the left inset of Fig. 3a. The inset depicts the pump (solid blue line) injecting +K polarized carriers in the WSe2 layer and the consequent electron transfer to the +K conduction band valley in the MoSe2 monolayer. The probe (dashed red line) measures the changes in transmission spectrum of the +K MoSe2 excitons. Figure 3c,d depict the effects that dominate the co-polarized DT response. Because the conduction band is partially filled, phase-space filling leads to a blue shift of the transmission resonance, and the neutral exciton (X°) oscillator strength is reduced (Fig. 3c). The inset to Fig. 3c depicts the DT signal calculated by taking the difference between the orange and dashed blue curves. The cross-polarized pump and probe configuration (green data) is depicted in the right inset of Fig. 3a. Here, the pump (solid blue line) injects carriers into the −K valley of the WSe2 layer, and the subsequent electron transfer to the –K valley of the MoSe2. With this –K valley electron population, when the probe beam (dashed red line) excites electron–hole pairs in +K valley, negatively charged excitons (X−) can form (Fig. 3e,f). The cross-polarized DT spectrum can be understood by examining Fig. 3e, which shows the pump-induced changes to the cross-polarized probe transmission spectrum. Relative to the pump off case, a population of electrons in the –K valley decreases the +K cross-polarized probe transmission at X− resonance due to the increases of X− oscillator strength, and increases the transmission at the X° resonance due to the decrease of X° oscillator strength. The inset to Fig. 3e shows the corresponding cross-polarized DT spectrum. We note that the 30 meV energy separation between the peak and dip in both the cross-polarized DT spectrum (green curve of Fig. 3a) and the CD spectra (Fig. 3b) is consistent with the binding energy of X−, and therefore further supports the picture of directional electron spin-valley transfer from WSe2 to MoSe2.

Discussion

We estimate the resulting spin-valley polarization of electrons in the MoSe2 layer by pumping the WSe2 resonance and comparing the relative co- and cross-circularly polarized DT responses of the X− in the MoSe2 layer. It has been demonstrated both experimentally4 and theoretically36 that the X− in MoSe2 is dominantly an intervalley charged exciton with the extra electron located in the lower conduction band of the opposite valley (see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 6). The X− formation and the magnitude of its corresponding DT signal measures the population of polarized electrons in the valley opposite the one being probed. Therefore, spin-valley polarization (ρ) in the MoSe2 layer resulting from interlayer spin-valley transfer can be estimated by ρ=. Since the negative MoSe2 charged exciton resonance is spectrally isolated, it is not significantly influenced by signals arising from the other resonances (Fig. 3a). We fit single Lorentzians to the MoSe2 DT response near X− (1.589 eV) for both co- and cross-circularly polarized pump and probe, and find that the ratio of the dip areas for the co-polarized response is 37% of the cross-polarized response (See Supplementary Fig. 7). This gives a 46% electron spin-valley polarization in the MoSe2 layer. This estimation is consistent with previous measurements of the interlayer exciton in helicity-dependent PL measurements, which was reported to be limited by depolarization of the monolayer exciton before interlayer transfer26. When pumping the MoSe2 and probing the WSe2 excitons, the charged exciton feature is also clear in the CD response (Fig. 2c). Fitting the CD spectra with a difference of two Lorentzians, we find that the energy separation between the peak and dip is approximately 19 meV, consistent with the binding energy of positively charged excitons (X+) in WSe2 (refs 2, 3). This observation supports the picture of directional polarized hole spin transfer from MoSe2 to WSe2. However, due to the overlap of spectral features near the WSe2 positively charged exciton peak, we cannot accurately compare the co- and cross-circular DT responses of X+ to estimate a hole spin-valley polarization in the WSe2 layer. We also performed measurements on additional samples with varying twist angles (Supplementary Fig. 2). There are fine spectral features distinct from near zero twist angle samples, which require a future systematic study. However, both the sign and signal amplitude of the CD spectra are consistent for all twist angles, which implies that spin-valley conserved interlayer charge transport is robust for different twist angles. Our results demonstrate that spin-valley polarized carriers can be efficiently transferred between layers, providing a novel method for optically injecting long-lived and spin-valley polarized carriers in either layer of heterostructures with arbitrary twist angles. We expect this scheme could be especially useful in recent proposals that seek to use atomically thin-bilayer systems for spintronic or valleytronic applications25, or as a platform to investigate bosonic quasiparticle effects with spin structures37.

Methods

Sample fabrication

The heterostructures were assembled using a polycarbonate film dry transfer technique. Supplementary Note 1 contains the methods used to determine the crystal axes. The sample in the main text was encapsulated in 5–10 nm thick hexagonal boron nitride and mounted on a c-axis sapphire substrate to allow for optical transmission measurements.

Nonlinear optical measurements

The data shown in the main text were measured in a cold-finger cryostat. Two continuous-wave tunable Ti:sapphire lasers (M2 SolsTiS) provided the pump and probe beams, which were each amplitude modulated with acousto-optic modulators at frequencies near 700 kHz. Both beams were actively intensity stabilized. A probe of 20 μW and a pump of 40 μW average power were used for all spectra in the main text. Polarizers and broadband waveplates were used to set the polarization of pump and probe, which were focused onto the sample with a microscope objective to a beam spot of ∼1 μm. The transmitted light was collected by a 15 mm spherical lens that was mounted in the cold finger of the cryostat. In the DR measurements, the reflected probe was collected with the objective. The pump beam was rejected with a cross-polarized set-up, or with a short or long pass filter. The probe was detected with an amplified silicon photodiode. The DT or DR signal was then measured with a phase-sensitive lock-in amplifier which was locked to the difference between the pump and probe modulation frequencies. The transmitted (T) or reflected (R) probe power was measured simultaneously with the DT or DR signal while the pump was modulated and used to normalize the DT/T or DR/R response.

Data availability

The authors declare that all of the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information file.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Schaibley, J. R. et al. Directional interlayer spin-valley transfer in two-dimensional heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 7, 13747 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13747 (2016). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  26 in total

1.  Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity.

Authors:  Kin Fai Mak; Keliang He; Jie Shan; Tony F Heinz
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping.

Authors:  Hualing Zeng; Junfeng Dai; Wang Yao; Di Xiao; Xiaodong Cui
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2.

Authors:  Aaron M Jones; Hongyi Yu; Nirmal J Ghimire; Sanfeng Wu; Grant Aivazian; Jason S Ross; Bo Zhao; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Di Xiao; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Electrical control of second-harmonic generation in a WSe2 monolayer transistor.

Authors:  Kyle L Seyler; John R Schaibley; Pu Gong; Pasqual Rivera; Aaron M Jones; Sanfeng Wu; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Giant enhancement of the optical second-harmonic emission of WSe(2) monolayers by laser excitation at exciton resonances.

Authors:  G Wang; X Marie; I Gerber; T Amand; D Lagarde; L Bouet; M Vidal; A Balocchi; B Urbaszek
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Observation of long-lived interlayer excitons in monolayer MoSe2-WSe2 heterostructures.

Authors:  Pasqual Rivera; John R Schaibley; Aaron M Jones; Jason S Ross; Sanfeng Wu; Grant Aivazian; Philip Klement; Kyle Seyler; Genevieve Clark; Nirmal J Ghimire; Jiaqiang Yan; D G Mandrus; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS₂/WS₂ heterostructures.

Authors:  Xiaoping Hong; Jonghwan Kim; Su-Fei Shi; Yu Zhang; Chenhao Jin; Yinghui Sun; Sefaattin Tongay; Junqiao Wu; Yanfeng Zhang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Valley-polarized exciton dynamics in a 2D semiconductor heterostructure.

Authors:  Pasqual Rivera; Kyle L Seyler; Hongyi Yu; John R Schaibley; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor.

Authors:  Jason S Ross; Sanfeng Wu; Hongyi Yu; Nirmal J Ghimire; Aaron M Jones; Grant Aivazian; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Di Xiao; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Dirac cones and Dirac saddle points of bright excitons in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides.

Authors:  Hongyi Yu; Gui-Bin Liu; Pu Gong; Xiaodong Xu; Wang Yao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  7 in total

1.  Signatures of moiré-trapped valley excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers.

Authors:  Kyle L Seyler; Pasqual Rivera; Hongyi Yu; Nathan P Wilson; Essance L Ray; David G Mandrus; Jiaqiang Yan; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evidence for moiré excitons in van der Waals heterostructures.

Authors:  Kha Tran; Galan Moody; Fengcheng Wu; Xiaobo Lu; Junho Choi; Kyounghwan Kim; Amritesh Rai; Daniel A Sanchez; Jiamin Quan; Akshay Singh; Jacob Embley; André Zepeda; Marshall Campbell; Travis Autry; Takashi Taniguchi; Kenji Watanabe; Nanshu Lu; Sanjay K Banerjee; Kevin L Silverman; Suenne Kim; Emanuel Tutuc; Li Yang; Allan H MacDonald; Xiaoqin Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Modulation of photocarrier relaxation dynamics in two-dimensional semiconductors.

Authors:  Yuhan Wang; Zhonghui Nie; Fengqiu Wang
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 17.782

4.  Localized interlayer excitons in MoSe2-WSe2 heterostructures without a moiré potential.

Authors:  Fateme Mahdikhanysarvejahany; Daniel N Shanks; Matthew Klein; Qian Wang; Michael R Koehler; David G Mandrus; Takashi Taniguchi; Kenji Watanabe; Oliver L A Monti; Brian J LeRoy; John R Schaibley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  All-optical control of spin in a 2D van der Waals magnet.

Authors:  Maciej Da Browski; Shi Guo; Mara Strungaru; Paul S Keatley; Freddie Withers; Elton J G Santos; Robert J Hicken
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Negative circular polarization emissions from WSe2/MoSe2 commensurate heterobilayers.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Hsu; Li-Syuan Lu; Po-Hsun Wu; Ming-Hao Lee; Peng-Jen Chen; Pei-Ying Wu; Yi-Chia Chou; Horng-Tay Jeng; Lain-Jong Li; Ming-Wen Chu; Wen-Hao Chang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Twist Angle mapping in layered WS2 by Polarization-Resolved Second Harmonic Generation.

Authors:  Sotiris Psilodimitrakopoulos; Leonidas Mouchliadis; Ioannis Paradisanos; George Kourmoulakis; Andreas Lemonis; George Kioseoglou; Emmanuel Stratakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.