Literature DB >> 2796634

Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions.

L A Siminoff1, J H Fetting.   

Abstract

This study was an in-depth examination of how 100 patients and physicians made treatment decisions about adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Specifically, the authors examined how outcome framing was associated with these decisions. Based on other studies, it was hypothesized that patients would choose more aggressive, nonstandard treatment regimens when outcomes were framed negatively, rather than positively. Contrary to these expectations, no significant associations were found between the framing of treatment outcomes and type of treatment chosen, or the acceptance or rejection of the physicians' treatment recommendations. Physicians practiced routinized communication patterns. Physicians tended to frame treatment outcomes similarly for all patients, regardless of severity of disease. It is concluded that the impact of outcome framing in real clinical situations is attenuated by verbal presentation of information and other factors more important to the decision process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2796634     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  17 in total

Review 1.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

2.  Studying patients' preferences in health care decision making. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Early phase clinical trials: communicating the uncertainties of 'magnitude of benefit' and 'likelihood of benefit'.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Mazie Tsang; Thomas W LeBlanc; Anthony Back; Paul R Duberstein; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Ronald M Epstein; Heidi D Klepin; Michael W Becker; Areej El-Jawahri; Stephanie J Lee
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Andrea M Angott; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

6.  How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mirta Galesic
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Purpose and benefits of early phase cancer trials: what do oncologists say? What do patients hear?

Authors:  Nancy Kass; Holly Taylor; Linda Fogarty; Jeremy Sugarman; Steven N Goodman; Annallys Goodwin-Landher; Michael Carducci; Herbert Hurwitz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Disclosing medical errors to patients: it's not what you say, it's what they hear.

Authors:  Albert W Wu; I-Chan Huang; Samantha Stokes; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  How do physicians talk with their patients about risks?

Authors:  A Kalet; J C Roberts; R Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.