BACKGROUND: Patients facing difficult decisions often ask physicians for recommendations. However, little is known regarding the ways that physicians' decisions are influenced by the act of making a recommendation. METHODS: We surveyed 2 representative samples of US primary care physicians-general internists and family medicine specialists listed in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile-and presented each with 1 of 2 clinical scenarios. Both involved 2 treatment alternatives, 1 of which yielded a better chance of surviving a fatal illness but at the cost of potentially experiencing unpleasant adverse effects. We randomized physicians to indicate which treatment they would choose if they were the patient or they were recommending a treatment to a patient. RESULTS: Among those asked to consider our colon cancer scenario (n = 242), 37.8% chose the treatment with a higher death rate for themselves but only 24.5% recommended this treatment to a hypothetical patient (χ(2)(1) = 4.67, P = .03). Among those receiving our avian influenza scenario (n = 698), 62.9% chose the outcome with the higher death rate for themselves but only 48.5% recommended this for patients (χ(2)(1) = 14.56, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The act of making a recommendation changes the ways that physicians think regarding medical choices. Better understanding of this thought process will help determine when or whether recommendations improve decision making.
BACKGROUND:Patients facing difficult decisions often ask physicians for recommendations. However, little is known regarding the ways that physicians' decisions are influenced by the act of making a recommendation. METHODS: We surveyed 2 representative samples of US primary care physicians-general internists and family medicine specialists listed in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile-and presented each with 1 of 2 clinical scenarios. Both involved 2 treatment alternatives, 1 of which yielded a better chance of surviving a fatal illness but at the cost of potentially experiencing unpleasant adverse effects. We randomized physicians to indicate which treatment they would choose if they were the patient or they were recommending a treatment to a patient. RESULTS: Among those asked to consider our colon cancer scenario (n = 242), 37.8% chose the treatment with a higher death rate for themselves but only 24.5% recommended this treatment to a hypothetical patient (χ(2)(1) = 4.67, P = .03). Among those receiving our avian influenza scenario (n = 698), 62.9% chose the outcome with the higher death rate for themselves but only 48.5% recommended this for patients (χ(2)(1) = 14.56, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The act of making a recommendation changes the ways that physicians think regarding medical choices. Better understanding of this thought process will help determine when or whether recommendations improve decision making.
Authors: Daneng Li; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Aaron D Viny; Meredith Cammarata; Ali Shamseddine; Ashwaq Al-Olayan; Hibah Osman; Ali Haydar; Ghassan Kanazi; Mohamed Naghy; Eileen M O'Reilly; Andrew S Epstein Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-10
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Susan L Norris; Sam Schulman; Jack Hirsh; Mark H Eckman; Elie A Akl; Mark Crowther; Per Olav Vandvik; John W Eikelboom; Marian S McDonagh; Sandra Zelman Lewis; David D Gutterman; Deborah J Cook; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Chest Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Regina Kwon; Larry A Allen; Laura D Scherer; Jocelyn S Thompson; Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud; Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Michele C Gornick; Aaron M Scherer; Erica J Sutton; Kerry A Ryan; Nicole L Exe; Ming Li; Wendy R Uhlmann; Scott Y H Kim; J Scott Roberts; Raymond G De Vries Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Lindsay A Renfro; Nan Zhang; Margarita Lopatin; Calvin Chao; Steven R Alberts Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 4.481