| Literature DB >> 27965449 |
Jie Hu1,2, Zhong Wei3, Ville-Petri Friman4, Shao-Hua Gu1, Xiao-Fang Wang1, Nico Eisenhauer5,6, Tian-Jie Yang1,2, Jing Ma1, Qi-Rong Shen1, Yang-Chun Xu3, Alexandre Jousset1,2.
Abstract
Bacterial communities associated with plant roots play an important role in the suppression of soil-borne pathogens, and multispecies probiotic consortia may enhance disease suppression efficacy. Here we introduced defined Pseudomonas species consortia into naturally complex microbial communities and measured the importance of Pseudomonas community diversity for their survival and the suppression of the bacterial plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum in the tomato rhizosphere microbiome. The survival of introduced Pseudomonas consortia increased with increasing diversity. Further, high Pseudomonas diversity reduced pathogen density in the rhizosphere and decreased the disease incidence due to both intensified resource competition and interference with the pathogen. These results provide novel mechanistic insights into elevated pathogen suppression by diverse probiotic consortia in naturally diverse plant rhizospheres. Ecologically based community assembly rules could thus play a key role in engineering functionally reliable microbiome applications. IMPORTANCE: The increasing demand for food supply requires more-efficient control of plant diseases. The use of probiotics, i.e., naturally occurring bacterial antagonists and competitors that suppress pathogens, has recently reemerged as a promising alternative to agrochemical use. It is, however, still unclear how many and which strains we should choose for constructing effective probiotic consortia. Here we present a general ecological framework for assembling effective probiotic communities based on in vitro characterization of community functioning. Specifically, we show that increasing the diversity of probiotic consortia enhances community survival in the naturally diverse rhizosphere microbiome, leading to increased pathogen suppression via intensified resource competition and interference with the pathogen. We propose that these ecological guidelines can be put to the test in microbiome engineering more widely in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27965449 PMCID: PMC5156302 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01790-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 Characterization of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in vitro. (A) Pseudomonas community niche breadth was defined as the number of carbon sources used by at least one of the members of Pseudomonas community (detailed information on resources can be found in Table S4). (B) Pseudomonas community niche overlap with the pathogen was defined as similarity in resource consumption between the resident community and the pathogen. (C) Antibacterial activity of Pseudomonas community was determined as a reduction in pathogen density in the presence of Pseudomonas bacterial supernatants; all supernatants were derived from monocultures and mixed together in testing the synergistic effects.
FIG 2 Characterization of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in vivo. (A) The dynamics of bacterial wilt disease incidence in Pseudomonas communities at different richness levels and at different points in time. (B) Pathogen density dynamics as affected by Pseudomonas communities with different richness levels. (C) Pseudomonas density dynamics in communities with different richness levels. Panel columns denote results at 5 days, 15 days, 25 days, and 35 days post-pathogen inoculation (dpi). The red dashed lines show the baseline for control treatments. In panels A and B, red dotted lines denote disease incidence and pathogen density in the absence of Pseudomonas bacteria; in panel C, red dashed lines denote Pseudomonas-specific phlD gene density in natural soil in the absence of introduced Pseudomonas bacteria.
ANOVA table on the main and interactive effects of genotypic richness and time on bacterial wilt incidence (proportion of wilted plants) and pathogen and probiotic Pseudomonas community abundances in the rhizosphere
| Parameter(s) | Disease incidence | Pathogen abundance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | 1 | 30.6 | <0.0001 | 74.6 | <0.0001 | 21.7 | <0.0001 |
| Time | 1 | 275.6 | <0.0001 | 181.2 | <0.0001 | 175.0 | <0.0001 |
| Richness × time | 1 | 30.8 | 0.0002 | 52.3 | <0.0001 | 2.3 | 0.1305 |
| No. of residuals | 188 | ||||||
All response variables were treated as continuous variables, and the genotypic richness and Pseudomonas abundance data were log-transformed before the analysis was performed. The df data denote degrees of freedom, R2 data denote total variance explained by the regression coefficient of determination, and AIC data denote Akaike’s information criterion. ANOVA, analysis of variance.
ANOVA table on the effects of probiotic Pseudomonas community resource use with respect to niche breadth and niche overlap with the pathogen and direct pathogen inhibition (toxicity) on bacterial wilt incidence (proportion of wilted plants) and pathogen and probiotic Pseudomonas community abundances in the rhizosphere
| Parameter | Value(s) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 dpi | 15 dpi | 25 dpi | 35 dpi | |||||||||
| Disease incidence | ||||||||||||
| Toxicity | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1 | 7.9 | 0.0071 | 1 | 11.3 | 0.0016 | ||
| NB | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1 | 4.5 | 0.0389 | |||
| NOI | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||
| No. of residuals | NR | 47 | 46 | 45 | ||||||||
| Model summary | NR | NR | ||||||||||
| AIC: 16.8 | AIC: 55.9 | |||||||||||
| Pathogen abundance | ||||||||||||
| Toxicity | 1 | 6.6 | 0.0135 | 1 | 4.7 | 0.0358 | 1 | 38.4 | 0.0001 | 1 | 69.2 | 0.0001 |
| NB | NR | NR | NR | NR | 22.9 | 0.0001 | 1 | 17.7 | 0.0001 | |||
| NOI | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||
| No. of residuals | 46 | 46 | 45 | 45 | ||||||||
| Model summary | ||||||||||||
| AIC: −155.7 | AIC: 25.4 | AIC: 49.9 | AIC: 58.2 | |||||||||
| Toxicity | NR | NR | 1 | 12.7 | 0.0009 | 1 | 4.4 | 0.0413 | NR | NR | ||
| NB | NR | NR | 1 | 5.6 | 0.0227 | NR | NR | 1 | 16.4 | 0.0002 | ||
| NOI | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||
| No. of residuals | 46 | 44 | 45 | 45 | ||||||||
| Model summary | NR | |||||||||||
| AIC: 31.6 | AIC: 49.3 | AIC: 32.3 | ||||||||||
All response variables were treated as continuous variables, and bacterial abundances were log-transformed before the analysis. Separate models were run for each dependent variable at different time points (5, 15, 25, and 35 days post-pathogen inoculation [dpi]). Table data represent only the most parsimonious models based on the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) where NR data denote variables that were not retained in the final models, df data denote degrees of freedom, and R2 data denote total variance explained by regression coefficient of determination. NB, niche breadth; NOI, niche overlap with the pathogen.
FIG 3 Structural equation models testing the mechanistic links between Pseudomonas community richness and pathogen density (A) and disease incidence (B) 35 days after pathogen inoculation. (A) Direct and indirect (corresponding to Pseudomonas community niche breadth and Pseudomonas community toxicity, respectively) richness effects on pathogen density. (B) Disease incidence data were explained only by a direct richness effect. Blue circles in both panels denote the proportion of the total variance explained. Blue arrows indicate negative relationships, and red arrows indicate positive relationships; double-headed, dashed arrows indicate undirected correlations between different variables (no hypothesis tested); and gray arrows indicate nonsignificant relationships between different variables. Arrow widths indicate the relative sizes of the effects, and the numbers beside the arrows show standardized correlation coefficients (relative effect sizes of nonsignificant correlations are not shown).