Literature DB >> 27965134

National Rise of Primary Pancreatic Carcinoid Tumors: Comparison to Functional and Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Gyulnara G Kasumova1, Omidreza Tabatabaie1, Mariam F Eskander1, Abhishek Tadikonda1, Sing Chau Ng1, Jennifer F Tseng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New guidelines recommend differentiating between carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) during clinical trials. However, little is known about the behavior and incidence of primary pancreatic carcinoid tumors. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to identify adults with primary PNETs diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the hazard of death in resected patients.
RESULTS: Of 10,752 patients, 12.7% were diagnosed with carcinoid tumors, 84.7% with nonfunctional and 2.6% with functional PNETs. Although the number of functional PNETs has remained relatively constant over time, rates of nonfunctional and carcinoid tumors have risen dramatically. Only 36 (5.7%) carcinoid tumors were diagnosed in 2004; this increased to 497 (27.7%) in 2013. Overall survival was significantly longer for carcinoid compared with functional and nonfunctional tumors (log-rank p < 0.0001), with 5-year survival rates of 63.1%, 58.3%, and 52.6%, respectively. For patients having resection, overall survival further improved for carcinoid tumors relative to functional (log-rank p = 0.0011) and nonfunctional (log-rank p < 0.0001) tumors, but the survival difference between functional and nonfunctional tumors disappeared (log-rank p = 0.4579); 5-year survival rates were 89.2%, 76.6%, and 78.7%, respectively. On multivariate Cox regression of the resected cohort, mortality was significantly higher for patients with functional (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81) and nonfunctional (HR 1.40) PNETs compared with carcinoid tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary pancreatic carcinoid tumors are increasingly being diagnosed. Differentiating PNET subtypes plays an important role in prognostication. Resection remains a critical component of care.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27965134      PMCID: PMC5446922          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  21 in total

1.  Surgical resection provides an overall survival benefit for patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Susan M Sharpe; Haejin In; David J Winchester; Mark S Talamonti; Marshall S Baker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Small serotonin-producing neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas associated with pancreatic duct obstruction.

Authors:  Satomi Kawamoto; Chanjuan Shi; Ralph H Hruban; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Elliot K Fishman; Stanley S Siegelman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the Delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set.

Authors:  David S Klimstra; Irvin R Modlin; N Volkan Adsay; Runjan Chetty; Vikram Deshpande; Mithat Gönen; Robert T Jensen; Mark Kidd; Matthew H Kulke; Ricardo V Lloyd; Cesar Moran; Steven F Moss; Kjell Oberg; Dermot O'Toole; Guido Rindi; Marie E Robert; Saul Suster; Laura H Tang; Chin-Yuan Tzen; Mary Kay Washington; Betram Wiedenmann; James Yao
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Future directions in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: consensus report of the National Cancer Institute Neuroendocrine Tumor clinical trials planning meeting.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Lillian L Siu; Joel E Tepper; George Fisher; Deborah Jaffe; Daniel G Haller; Lee M Ellis; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Emily K Bergsland; Timothy J Hobday; Eric Van Cutsem; James Pingpank; Kjell Oberg; Steven J Cohen; Mitchell C Posner; James C Yao
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

Authors:  Yassar M Hashim; Kathryn M Trinkaus; David C Linehan; Steven S Strasberg; Ryan C Fields; Dengfeng Cao; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Carcinoid and neuroendocrine tumors: building on success.

Authors:  Pamela L Kunz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Aggressive surgical resection in the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: when is it indicated?

Authors:  Pamela J Hodul; Jonathan R Strosberg; Larry K Kvols
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the impact of surgical resection on survival.

Authors:  Joshua S Hill; James T McPhee; Theodore P McDade; Zheng Zhou; Mary E Sullivan; Giles F Whalen; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark S Talamonti; James S Tomlinson; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

2.  Indications for resection and perioperative outcomes of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in Germany: an analysis of the prospective DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

Authors:  Ioannis Mintziras; Tobias Keck; Jens Werner; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Uwe Wittel; Norbert Senninger; Thorsten Vowinkel; Jörg Köninger; Matthias Anthuber; Bernd Geißler; Detlef Klaus Bartsch
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Abdominal and pelvic splenosis: atypical findings, pitfalls, and mimics.

Authors:  Travis Smoot; Jonathan Revels; Moataz Soliman; Peter Liu; Christine O Menias; Hero H Hussain; Hatice Savas; Ayman H Gaballah
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-01-25

4.  Landmark Series: Importance of Pancreatic Resection Margins.

Authors:  Mihir M Shah; Jashodeep Datta; Nipun B Merchant; David A Kooby
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatectomies for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Propensity-Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Hwee-Leong Tan; Roxanne Y A Teo; Nicholas L Syn; Jin-Yao Teo; Ser-Yee Lee; Peng-Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; Alexander Y F Chung; London L P J Ooi; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recent Insights.

Authors:  Jason S Starr; Mohamad Bassam Sonbol; Timothy J Hobday; Akash Sharma; Ayse Tuba Kendi; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.