| Literature DB >> 27959958 |
Vincent Lesieur1,2, Jean-François Martin2, David K Weaver3, Kim A Hoelmer4, David R Smith5, Wendell L Morrill3, Nassera Kadiri6, Frank B Peairs7, Darren M Cockrell7, Terri L Randolph7, Debra K Waters8, Marie-Claude Bon1.
Abstract
The wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), is a key pest of wheat in the northern Great Plains of North America, and damage resulting from this species has recently expanded southward. Current pest management practices are inadequate and uncertainty regarding geographic origin, as well as limited data on population structure and dynamics across North America impede progress towards more informed management. We examined the genetic divergence between samples collected in North America and northeastern Asia, the assumed native range of C. cinctus using two mitochondrial regions (COI and 16S). Subsequently, we characterized the structure of genetic diversity in the main wheat producing areas in North America using a combination of mtDNA marker and microsatellites in samples collected both in wheat fields and in grasses in wildlands. The strong genetic divergence observed between North American samples and Asian congeners, in particular the synonimized C. hyalinatus, did not support the hypothesis of a recent American colonization by C. cinctus. Furthermore, the relatively high genetic diversity both with mtDNA and microsatellite markers offered additional evidence in favor of the native American origin of this pest. The genetic diversity of North American populations is structured into three genetic clusters and these are highly correlated with geography. Regarding the recent southern outbreaks in North America, the results tend to exclude the hypothesis of recent movement of damaging wheat stem sawfly populations from the northern area. The shift in host plant use by local populations appears to be the most likely scenario. Finally, the significance of these findings is discussed in the context of pest management.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27959958 PMCID: PMC5154603 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Bayesian phylogenetic tree from analysis of the combined mtDNA dataset.
Posterior probabilities associated with major nodes are indicated in bold. Branch lengths represent expected substitutions per site. The scale bar indicates the expected number of substitutions per site. Results of the PTP analysis are provided using colored branches. Monophyletic groups in red indicate a single putative species as well as terminal branches in black. Names of terminals indicate codes of the samples and the GenBank number follows the names when sequences were obtained from Genbank. Names in bold after a | symbol are taxonomic or geographic identifiers of the putative species.
Comparison for each gene (above diagonal: 16S and below diagonal: COI) of the average pairwise divergences (p-distance, expressed as a %) between the different groups used in the study.
| Lineage 2 | Lineage 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 (±0.7) | 5.3 (±1.0) | 5.0 (±1.0) | 5.8 (±1.2) | 5.6 (±1.2) | 9.3 (±1.3) | 8.4 (±1.3) | ||
| 2.5 (±0.9) | 5.0 (±1.0) | 5.3 (±1.0) | 6.6 (±1.0) | 6.0 (±1.1) | 9.0 (±1.3) | 8.2 (±1.3) | ||
| 9.2 (±1.6) | 7.7 (±1.7) | 0.0 (±0.0) | 5.7 (±1.1) | 5.5 (±1.0) | 9.0 (±1.3) | 8.5 (±1.3) | ||
| 9.5 (±1.6) | 8.0 (±1.7) | 0.10 (±0.5) | 5.7 (±1.1) | 5.5 (±1.0) | 9.0 (±1.3) | 8.5 (±1.3) | ||
| 10.3 (±1.8) | 11.1 (±1.7) | 11.7 (±1.8) | 11.9 (±1.9) | 6.6 (±1.2) | 8.4 (±1.3) | 8.1 (±1.3) | ||
| 9.7 (±1.8) | 10.7 (±1.8) | 12.6 (±1.9) | 12.6 (±1.9) | 12.3 (±1.9) | 8.2 (±1.3) | 9.0 (±1.4) | ||
| 14.6 (±2.1) | 14.6 (±2.1) | 13.4 (±2.0) | 13.4 (±2.0) | 12.1 (±1.9) | 13.4 (±2.0) | 7.6 (±1.2) | ||
| 15.6 (±2.2) | 15.7 (±2.2) | 15.8 (±2.2) | 16.0 (±2.2) | 15.3 (±2.1) | 11.9 (±2.1) | 10.0 (±1.8) | ||
Fig 2Bayesian phylogenetic tree from analysis of the COI sequences of North American Cephus cinctus.
Posterior probabilities associated with major nodes are indicated in bold. Branch lengths represent expected substitutions per site. The scale bar indicates the expected number of substitutions per site. Cephus fumipennis was used as outgroup.
Fig 3Phylogenetic relationships and genetic clustering Cephus cinctus across North America using a mitochondrial marker (COI).
A. COI mitochondrial network of the North American Cephus cinctus. Each circle corresponds to one haplotype; circle size gives the proportion of individuals belonging to the haplotype. The color inside each circle represents the host and indicates the proportion of individuals sampled in the different hosts. Each link between circles indicates one mutational event. Black circles represent missing intermediate haplotypes. B. Geographic locations of Cephus cinctus samples used in the mtDNA phylogeography and distribution of COI haplogroups. Pie chart sizes are proportional to sample size and each haplogroup is colored according to the results of Bayesian tree and haplotype network. Dotted white lines represent the three groups identified by the SAMOVA.
Indices of genetic diversity per clusters identified in SAMOVA, Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs statistics.
| Clusters | H | Hd | ± SD | π | ± SD | Tajima's | Fu's | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Cluster | 156 | 19 | 0.774 | 0.024 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 11.681 | -0.901 | 0.184 | -4.224 | 0.090 |
| Mountain Cluster | 75 | 20 | 0.813 | 0.039 | 0.010 | 0.005 | 19.000 | -0.939 | 0.188 | 0.518 | 0.518 |
| Southern Cluster | 90 | 28 | 0.687 | 0.056 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 23.395 | -1.732 | 0.016 | -13.730 | 0.001 |
n: Number of individuals analyzed; H: Number of haplotypes; Hd: Gene diversity and its standard deviation; r: Allelic richness after rarefaction; π: Nucleotide diversity and its standard deviation; Tajima's D and Fu's FS: results of neutrality test and their respective p–values.
Fig 4Genetic clustering of Cephus cinctus across North America using 5 microsatellites.
A. Neighbor-joining tree based on the chord distances of Cavalli-Sforza & Edwards (1967) computed between the sampled populations. B. Above. Graphical representation of population genetic structure estimated by the Bayesian clustering approach implemented in Structure software. Provinces / states are indicated above the plots whereas sampling localities below. Each individual is represented by a vertical line and the proportion of each color corresponds to the percentage of coancestry in each genetic cluster. B. Below. Map of collections in the North America. Each location is represented by a pie chart showing ancestry (Q) among three genetic clusters as determined by analysis with Structure. Pie chart sizes are proportional to sample size. C. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot based on the genetic distance among the different populations. Each population is colored according to the Structure clustering (K = 3).