Literature DB >> 27957231

Safety and Feasibility of Contrast Injection During Pulmonary Vein Isolation with the nMARQ™ Multi-Electrode Catheter.

Avishag Laish Farkash1, Amos Katz1, Ornit Cohen1, Evgeny Fishman1, Chaim Yosefy1, Vladimir Khalameizer1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the irrigated multi-electrode ablation system (nMARQ™) remains challenging in complex atrial anatomy cases and when CARTOMERGE™ technology is not available, due to absence of a leading guide-wire.
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess feasibility and safety of PVI using nMARQ™ catheter with intra-procedural contrast injections through the deflectable sheath compared to nMARQ™ alone.
METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized observational study of 78 consecutive patients who underwent PVI only with nMARQ™. The first group (n=37, 64±10.5 years, 62% male, 13.5% persistent AF) underwent the procedure with the guidance of signal mapping, fluoroscopy, and electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) alone. Since 12/2013 an automatic closed-loop contrast media injector was added to improve catheter location (n=41, 62.5±11 years, 71% male, 34% persistent AF).
RESULTS: Total procedure time was 78±19 and 85.5±18.5 minutes, and mean fluoroscopy time was 30±9 and 29.5±8.7 minutes for the first and second groups, respectively (NS); acute success rate was 97% and 97.5%, with a mean of 14.7±5 and 17.6±5.4 RF applications, respectively (p=0.02); and mean total burning time of 10.3±3.6 and 12±4 minutes, respectively (p=0.08). Mean contrast used was 60±18 mL versus 203±65 mL, with no effect on renal function or major complications. One year freedom from AF was 77% and 83%, respectively (p=0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of contrast injections to standard nMARQ™ procedure is feasible and safe. It has no benefit in routine use but further studies may confirm its potential added value to EAM in catheter localization by newly trained operators and in selective cases of large/common PV anatomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  simus si; Agnisciet quamus; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Contrast Injection; Multi-Electrode Ablation Catheter; nMARQ

Year:  2015        PMID: 27957231      PMCID: PMC5135190          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  12 in total

1.  Pulmonary vein isolation with a new multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter (nMARQ™): feasibility, acute and short-term efficacy, safety, and impact on postablation silent cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Marco Scaglione; Domenico Caponi; Matteo Anselmino; Francesca Di Clemente; Alessandro Blandino; Federico Ferraris; Paolo Di Donna; Elisa Ebrille; Franck Halimi; Jean F Leclercq; Costanza Iunco; Carloeugenio Vaudagna; Federico Cesarani; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-14

2.  Cerebral microembolization during atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of different single-shot ablation techniques.

Authors:  Alexandra Kiss; Edina Nagy-Baló; Gábor Sándorfi; István Edes; Zoltán Csanádi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Initial results of using a novel irrigated multielectrode mapping and ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Dong-In Shin; Kiriakos Kirmanoglou; Christian Eickholt; Jan Schmidt; Lukas Clasen; Britta Butzbach; Tienush Rassaf; Marc Merx; Malte Kelm; Christian Meyer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Pulmonary vein isolation by duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar antrum ablation using a novel multielectrode ablation catheter system: first clinical results.

Authors:  Marcus Wieczorek; Reinhard Hoeltgen; Martin Brueck; Dirk Bandorski; Elvan Akin; Ali Reza Salili
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Acute safety and efficacy of a novel multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Thomas Deneke; Anja Schade; Patrick Müller; Rainer Schmitt; Georgios Christopoulos; Joachim Krug; Geza Szöllösi; Andreas Mügge; Sebastian Kerber; Karin Nentwich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04

6.  Pulmonary vein isolation by duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency energy with a multielectrode ablation catheter.

Authors:  Lucas V A Boersma; Maurits C E F Wijffels; Hakan Oral; Eric F D Wever; Fred Morady
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures.

Authors:  Abhishek Deshmukh; Nileshkumar J Patel; Sadip Pant; Neeraj Shah; Ankit Chothani; Kathan Mehta; Peeyush Grover; Vikas Singh; Srikanth Vallurupalli; Ghanshyambhai T Savani; Apurva Badheka; Tushar Tuliani; Kaustubh Dabhadkar; George Dibu; Y Madhu Reddy; Asif Sewani; Marcin Kowalski; Raul Mitrani; Hakan Paydak; Juan F Viles-Gonzalez
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Pulmonary vein isolation using a circular, open irrigated mapping and ablation catheter (nMARQ): a report on feasibility and efficacy.

Authors:  Stephan Zellerhoff; Matthew Daly; Han S Lim; Arnaud Denis; Yuki Komatsu; Laurence Jesel; Nicolas Derval; Frédéric Sacher; Hubert Cochet; Sébastien Knecht; Sunthareth Yiem; Mélèze Hocini; Michel Haïssaguerre; Pierre Jaïs
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Image integration increases efficacy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: results from the CartoMerge Italian Registry.

Authors:  Emanuele Bertaglia; Paolo Della Bella; Claudio Tondo; Alessandro Proclemer; Nicola Bottoni; Roberto De Ponti; Maurizio Landolina; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Leonardo Corò; Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio Dello Russo; Roberto Verlato; Massimo Mantica; Franco Zoppo
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear left atrial ablation as a single-catheter technique to achieve bidirectional conduction block: the pace-and-ablate approach.

Authors:  Charlotte Eitel; Gerhard Hindricks; Philipp Sommer; Thomas Gaspar; Simon Kircher; Ulrike Wetzel; Nicos Dagres; Masahiro Esato; Andreas Bollmann; Daniela Husser; Sebastian Hilbert; Ruzbeh Zaker-Shahrak; Arash Arya; Christopher Piorkowski
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of the Efficacy of PVAC® and nMARQ for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Avishag Laish-Farkash; Mahmoud Suleiman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-04-30

2.  Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Peri-Procedural Complication Rates in nMARQ vs. Conventional Ablation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ka H C Li; Mei Dong; Mengqi Gong; George Bazoukis; Ishan Lakhani; Yan Y Ting; Sunny H Wong; Guangping Li; William K K Wu; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Martin C S Wong; Konstantinos Letsas; Yimei Du; Victoria Laxton; Bryan P Yan; Yat S Chan; Yunlong Xia; Tong Liu; Gary Tse
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.