Literature DB >> 27956228

Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Identifies Regulators of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase as Suppressors of Liver Tumors in Mice.

Chun-Qing Song1, Yingxiang Li2, Haiwei Mou1, Jill Moore3, Angela Park1, Yotsawat Pomyen4, Soren Hough1, Zachary Kennedy1, Andrew Fischer5, Hao Yin6, Daniel G Anderson7, Darryl Conte1, Lars Zender8, Xin Wei Wang4, Snorri Thorgeirsson4, Zhiping Weng9, Wen Xue10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been a challenge to identify liver tumor suppressors or oncogenes due to the genetic heterogeneity of these tumors. We performed a genome-wide screen to identify suppressors of liver tumor formation in mice, using CRISPR-mediated genome editing.
METHODS: We performed a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9-based knockout screen of P53-null mouse embryonic liver progenitor cells that overexpressed MYC. We infected p53-/-;Myc;Cas9 hepatocytes with the mGeCKOa lentiviral library of 67,000 single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs), targeting 20,611 mouse genes, and transplanted the transduced cells subcutaneously into nude mice. Within 1 month, all the mice that received the sgRNA library developed subcutaneous tumors. We performed high-throughput sequencing of tumor DNA and identified sgRNAs increased at least 8-fold compared to the initial cell pool. To validate the top 10 candidate tumor suppressors from this screen, we collected data from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the Cancer Genome Atlas and COSMIC databases. We used CRISPR to inactivate candidate tumor suppressor genes in p53-/-;Myc;Cas9 cells and transplanted them subcutaneously into nude mice; tumor formation was monitored and tumors were analyzed by histology and immunohistochemistry. Mice with liver-specific disruption of p53 were given hydrodynamic tail-vein injections of plasmids encoding Myc and sgRNA/Cas9 designed to disrupt candidate tumor suppressors; growth of tumors and metastases was monitored. We compared gene expression profiles of liver cells with vs without tumor suppressor gene disrupted by sgRNA/Cas9. Genes found to be up-regulated after tumor suppressor loss were examined in liver cancer cell lines; their expression was knocked down using small hairpin RNAs, and tumor growth was examined in nude mice. Effects of the MEK inhibitors AZD6244, U0126, and trametinib, or the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib, were examined in human and mouse HCC cell lines.
RESULTS: We identified 4 candidate liver tumor suppressor genes not previously associated with liver cancer (Nf1, Plxnb1, Flrt2, and B9d1). CRISPR-mediated knockout of Nf1, a negative regulator of RAS, accelerated liver tumor formation in mice. Loss of Nf1 or activation of RAS up-regulated the liver progenitor cell markers HMGA2 and SOX9. RAS pathway inhibitors suppressed the activation of the Hmga2 and Sox9 genes that resulted from loss of Nf1 or oncogenic activation of RAS. Knockdown of HMGA2 delayed formation of xenograft tumors from cells that expressed oncogenic RAS. In human HCCs, low levels of NF1 messenger RNA or high levels of HMGA2 messenger RNA were associated with shorter patient survival time. Liver cancer cells with inactivation of Plxnb1, Flrt2, and B9d1 formed more tumors in mice and had increased levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a CRISPR-based strategy, we identified Nf1, Plxnb1, Flrt2, and B9d1 as suppressors of liver tumor formation. We validated the observation that RAS signaling, via mitogen-activated protein kinase, contributes to formation of liver tumors in mice. We associated decreased levels of NF1 and increased levels of its downstream protein HMGA2 with survival times of patients with HCC. Strategies to inhibit or reduce HMGA2 might be developed to treat patients with liver cancer.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR Screen; Liver Cancer; Mouse Model; Tumor Suppressor Genes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27956228      PMCID: PMC6204228          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  56 in total

1.  Molecular pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Snorri S Thorgeirsson; Joe W Grisham
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy.

Authors:  Peter E Czabotar; Guillaume Lessene; Andreas Strasser; Jerry M Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Mouse model of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma validates FIG-ROS as a potent fusion oncogene and therapeutic target.

Authors:  Anna Saborowski; Michael Saborowski; Monika A Davare; Brian J Druker; David S Klimstra; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Genetic Landscape and Biomarkers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jessica Zucman-Rossi; Augusto Villanueva; Jean-Charles Nault; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  BRaf and MEK inhibitors differentially regulate cell fate and microenvironment in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Breunig; Bernadett J Mueller; Ludmila Umansky; Kristin Wahl; Katrin Hoffmann; Frank Lehner; Michael P Manns; Heike Bantel; Christine S Falk
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  WNT and beta-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies.

Authors:  Randall T Moon; Aimee D Kohn; Giancarlo V De Ferrari; Ajamete Kaykas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer.

Authors:  Simon A Forbes; David Beare; Prasad Gunasekaran; Kenric Leung; Nidhi Bindal; Harry Boutselakis; Minjie Ding; Sally Bamford; Charlotte Cole; Sari Ward; Chai Yin Kok; Mingming Jia; Tisham De; Jon W Teague; Michael R Stratton; Ultan McDermott; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  AEG-1 Promotes Metastasis Through Downstream AKR1C2 and NF1 in Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Cong Li; Xia Wu; Wei Zhang; Jia Li; Huawei Liu; Ming Hao; Junsong Wang; Honghai Zhang; Gengxia Yang; Meijun Hao; Shoupeng Sheng; Yu Sun; Jiang Long; Xiongbing Hu; Hanshuo Zhang; Caixia Hu; Li Li; Jiasheng Zheng
Journal:  Oncol Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.574

10.  Lentiviral vector-based insertional mutagenesis identifies genes associated with liver cancer.

Authors:  Marco Ranzani; Daniela Cesana; Cynthia C Bartholomae; Francesca Sanvito; Mauro Pala; Fabrizio Benedicenti; Pierangela Gallina; Lucia Sergi Sergi; Stefania Merella; Alessandro Bulfone; Claudio Doglioni; Christof von Kalle; Yoon Jun Kim; Manfred Schmidt; Giovanni Tonon; Luigi Naldini; Eugenio Montini
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  29 in total

1.  In Vivo Genome Editing Partially Restores Alpha1-Antitrypsin in a Murine Model of AAT Deficiency.

Authors:  Chun-Qing Song; Dan Wang; Tingting Jiang; Kevin O'Connor; Qiushi Tang; Lingling Cai; Xiangrui Li; Zhiping Weng; Hao Yin; Guangping Gao; Christian Mueller; Terence R Flotte; Wen Xue
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9: at the cutting edge of hepatology.

Authors:  Francis P Pankowicz; Kelsey E Jarrett; William R Lagor; Karl-Dimiter Bissig
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: mechanisms, advances and prospects.

Authors:  Hongyi Li; Yang Yang; Weiqi Hong; Mengyuan Huang; Min Wu; Xia Zhao
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-01-03

4.  [Development and applications of CRISPR/Cas9 library screening technology in cancer research].

Authors:  Ting Lei; Bin Xiao; Yongyin He; Jing Qu; Zhaohui Sun; Linhai Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-11-30

5.  CRISPR-Cas-related technologies in basic and translational liver research.

Authors:  Chun-Qing Song; Wen Xue
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Cancer CRISPR Screens In Vivo.

Authors:  Ryan D Chow; Sidi Chen
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 7.  Development of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated technology for potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Yue-Ying Huang; Xiao-Yu Zhang; Ping Zhu; Ling Ji
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 1.534

8.  CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing causes alternative splicing of the targeting mRNA.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Yao Fu; Chitra Thakur; Zhuoyue Bi; Priya Wadgaonkar; Yiran Qiu; Liping Xu; M'Kya Rice; Wenxuan Zhang; Bandar Almutairy; Fei Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Hepatocyte-specific TAK1 deficiency drives RIPK1 kinase-dependent inflammation to promote liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuixia Tan; Jing Zhao; Ziyu Sun; Shuangyi Cao; Kongyan Niu; Yedan Zhong; Han Wang; Linyu Shi; Heling Pan; Junhao Hu; Lihui Qian; Nan Liu; Junying Yuan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Exploring liver cancer biology through functional genetic screens.

Authors:  Cun Wang; Ying Cao; Chen Yang; René Bernards; Wenxin Qin
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.