Literature DB >> 32460957

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing causes alternative splicing of the targeting mRNA.

Qian Zhang1, Yao Fu1, Chitra Thakur1, Zhuoyue Bi1, Priya Wadgaonkar1, Yiran Qiu1, Liping Xu1, M'Kya Rice1, Wenxuan Zhang1, Bandar Almutairy2, Fei Chen3.   

Abstract

The technique of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has been widely used to specifically delete the selected target genes through generating double strand breaks (DSBs) and inducing insertion and/or deletion (indel) of the genomic DNAs in the cells. We recently applied this technique to disrupt mineral dust-induced gene (mdig), a potential oncogene as previously reported, by single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the third exon of mdig gene in several cell types, including human bronchial epithelial cell line BEAS-2B, lung cancer cell line A549, and human triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 cells. In addition to the successful knockout of mdig gene in these cells, we unexpectedly noted generation of several alternatively spliced mdig mRNAs. Amplification of the mdig mRNAs during the screening of knockout clones by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the subsequent sanger sequencing of DNA revealed deletion and alternative splicing of mdig mRNAs induced by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. The most common deletions include nine and twenty-four nucleotides deletion around the DSBs. In addition, interestingly, some mdig mRNAs showed skipping of the entire exon 3, or alternative splicing between exon 2 and exon 8 using the new donor and accept splicing sites, leading to deletion of exons 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Accordingly, cautions should be taken when using CRISPR-Cas9 strategy to edit human genes due to the unintended alterative splicing of the target mRNAs. It is very likely that new proteins, some of which may be highly oncogenic, may be generated from CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32460957      PMCID: PMC7350697          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.04.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  42 in total

1.  An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Miller; Michael C Holmes; Jianbin Wang; Dmitry Y Guschin; Ya-Li Lee; Igor Rupniewski; Christian M Beausejour; Adam J Waite; Nathaniel S Wang; Kenneth A Kim; Philip D Gregory; Carl O Pabo; Edward J Rebar
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors.

Authors:  Matthew J Moscou; Adam J Bogdanove
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  CRISPR-mediated targeting of HER2 inhibits cell proliferation through a dominant negative mutation.

Authors:  Huajing Wang; William Sun
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Functional Gene Correction for Cystic Fibrosis in Lung Epithelial Cells Generated from Patient iPSCs.

Authors:  Amy L Firth; Tushar Menon; Gregory S Parker; Susan J Qualls; Benjamin M Lewis; Eugene Ke; Carl T Dargitz; Rebecca Wright; Ajai Khanna; Fred H Gage; Inder M Verma
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  In Vivo Genome Editing Restores Dystrophin Expression and Cardiac Function in Dystrophic Mice.

Authors:  Mona El Refaey; Li Xu; Yandi Gao; Benjamin D Canan; T M Ayodele Adesanya; Sarah C Warner; Keiko Akagi; David E Symer; Peter J Mohler; Jianjie Ma; Paul M L Janssen; Renzhi Han
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Inactivation of the human papillomavirus E6 or E7 gene in cervical carcinoma cells by using a bacterial CRISPR/Cas RNA-guided endonuclease.

Authors:  Edward M Kennedy; Anand V R Kornepati; Michael Goldstein; Hal P Bogerd; Brigid C Poling; Adam W Whisnant; Michael B Kastan; Bryan R Cullen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Domain-focused CRISPR screen identifies HRI as a fetal hemoglobin regulator in human erythroid cells.

Authors:  Jeremy D Grevet; Xianjiang Lan; Nicole Hamagami; Christopher R Edwards; Laavanya Sankaranarayanan; Xinjun Ji; Saurabh K Bhardwaj; Carolyne J Face; David F Posocco; Osheiza Abdulmalik; Cheryl A Keller; Belinda Giardine; Simone Sidoli; Ben A Garcia; Stella T Chou; Stephen A Liebhaber; Ross C Hardison; Junwei Shi; Gerd A Blobel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes.

Authors:  Eric T Wang; Rickard Sandberg; Shujun Luo; Irina Khrebtukova; Lu Zhang; Christine Mayr; Stephen F Kingsmore; Gary P Schroth; Christopher B Burge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Inhibition of HSV-1 Replication by Gene Editing Strategy.

Authors:  Pamela C Roehm; Masoud Shekarabi; Hassen S Wollebo; Anna Bellizzi; Lifan He; Julian Salkind; Kamel Khalili
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces gene knockdown by altering the pre-mRNA splicing in mice.

Authors:  Ji-Xin Tang; Dafeng Chen; Shou-Long Deng; Jian Li; Yuanyuan Li; Zheng Fu; Xiu-Xia Wang; Yan Zhang; Su-Ren Chen; Yi-Xun Liu
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.563

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  p53 Isoforms as Cancer Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Liuqun Zhao; Suparna Sanyal
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Exon skipping induced by CRISPR-directed gene editing regulates the response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Kelly Banas; Shirin Modarai; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Byung-Chun Yoo; Pawel A Bialk; Connor Barrett; Mona Batish; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.184

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.