Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic power of the novel two-dimensional parameter Bruch's membrane opening minimal rim area (BMO-MRA) in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for detection of glaucoma compared to minimal rim width (BMO-MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in large and small optic discs. Methods: In this case-control, cross-sectional study, 207 eyes of 207 participants, including 89 controls and 97 patients with glaucoma and 21 with ocular hypertension (OHT), with a disc size <1.63 mm2 or >2.43 mm2 underwent SD-OCT, confocal laser scanning tomography (CSLT), visual field testing, and clinical examination. Bruch's membrane opening-MRA BMO-MRW, RNFL thickness of SD-OCT and disc margin rim area (DM-RA) of CSLT were evaluated and analyzed for diagnostic power to detect glaucoma. Results: In healthy eyes with macrodiscs, mean BMO-MRW of 243.14 ± 43.12 μm was significantly smaller than BMO-MRW in microdiscs (338.97 ± 69.39; P < 0.001). Bruch's membrane opening-MRA was comparable between disc size groups with 1.22 ± 0.25 mm2 for macrodiscs and 1.26 ± 0.27 mm2 for microdiscs (P = 0.51), as was RNFL thickness (82.69 ± 15.76 μm versus 78.53 ± 11.01 μm, respectively; P = 0.28). Perimetric mean deviation was -8.7 ± 6.3 dB in glaucoma and -0.6 ± 1.60 dB in OHT patients. Correlation of BMO-MRA and visual field function was rho (ρ) = 0.70 (P < 0.001). Diagnostic power to differentiate glaucoma patients was highest for BMO-MRA. Partial area under the curve (pAUC) for BMO-MRA was 0.14 for specificity between 0.8 and 1.0, exceeding pAUCs of BMO-MRW (P < 0.001), RNFL thickness (P = 0.03), and DM-RA (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Bruch's membrane opening-based minimum rim area measurements offer advantages compared to one-dimensional parameters assessing neuroretinal rim by SD-OCT. In nonglaucomatous eyes, BMO-MRA values seem comparable for the full range of disc sizes. Bruch's membrane opening-MRA surpasses other parameters in diagnostic power for glaucoma.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic power of the novel two-dimensional parameter Bruch's membrane opening minimal rim area (BMO-MRA) in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for detection of glaucoma compared to minimal rim width (BMO-MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in large and small optic discs. Methods: In this case-control, cross-sectional study, 207 eyes of 207 participants, including 89 controls and 97 patients with glaucoma and 21 with ocular hypertension (OHT), with a disc size <1.63 mm2 or >2.43 mm2 underwent SD-OCT, confocal laser scanning tomography (CSLT), visual field testing, and clinical examination. Bruch's membrane opening-MRA BMO-MRW, RNFL thickness of SD-OCT and disc margin rim area (DM-RA) of CSLT were evaluated and analyzed for diagnostic power to detect glaucoma. Results: In healthy eyes with macrodiscs, mean BMO-MRW of 243.14 ± 43.12 μm was significantly smaller than BMO-MRW in microdiscs (338.97 ± 69.39; P < 0.001). Bruch's membrane opening-MRA was comparable between disc size groups with 1.22 ± 0.25 mm2 for macrodiscs and 1.26 ± 0.27 mm2 for microdiscs (P = 0.51), as was RNFL thickness (82.69 ± 15.76 μm versus 78.53 ± 11.01 μm, respectively; P = 0.28). Perimetric mean deviation was -8.7 ± 6.3 dB in glaucoma and -0.6 ± 1.60 dB in OHT patients. Correlation of BMO-MRA and visual field function was rho (ρ) = 0.70 (P < 0.001). Diagnostic power to differentiate glaucomapatients was highest for BMO-MRA. Partial area under the curve (pAUC) for BMO-MRA was 0.14 for specificity between 0.8 and 1.0, exceeding pAUCs of BMO-MRW (P < 0.001), RNFL thickness (P = 0.03), and DM-RA (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Bruch's membrane opening-based minimum rim area measurements offer advantages compared to one-dimensional parameters assessing neuroretinal rim by SD-OCT. In nonglaucomatous eyes, BMO-MRA values seem comparable for the full range of disc sizes. Bruch's membrane opening-MRA surpasses other parameters in diagnostic power for glaucoma.
Authors: Kay Gawlik; Frank Hausser; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt; Ella Maria Kadas Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Elise V Taniguchi; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Dejiao Li; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Stacey C Brauner; Scott H Greenstein; Angela V Turalba; Janey L Wiggs; Louis R Pasquale; Lucy Q Shen Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2017-12-08
Authors: Philip Enders; Werner Adler; Friederike Schaub; Manuel M Hermann; Michael Diestelhorst; Thomas Dietlein; Claus Cursiefen; Ludwig M Heindl Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sol La Bruna; Emmanouil Tsamis; Zane Z Zemborain; Zhichao Wu; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.503