Suresh Subramaniam1,2, Jin Wook Jeoung1, Won June Lee1, Young Kook Kim1, Ki Ho Park3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-Ro Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Alor Star, Kedah, Malaysia. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-Ro Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. kihopark@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic capability of three-dimensional (3D) neuro-retinal rim thickness (NRR) with existing optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) scan parameters using high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Based on the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), the 152 subjects were categorized into mild (MD > - 6 dB, 100), moderate (MD - 6 to - 12 dB, 26), and severe (MD < - 12 dB, 26) glaucoma. The HD-OCT values of NRR, RNFL and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses, along with those of other parameters (rim area, disc area) were obtained, and the average NRR thickness was calculated. RESULTS: For all of the HD-OCT parameters, RNFL thickness showed a higher area under the ROC (AUROC) curve (range: 0.937-1.000) than did NRR thickness (range: 0.827-1.000). There were significant RNFL, NRR, and GCIPL AUROC curve differences among the mild, moderate and severe glaucoma groups. RNFL thickness for mild glaucoma showed a significantly larger area than did NRR thickness [area difference: 0.110 (± 0.025); p value < 0.0001). Furthermore, RNFL relative to NRR thickness yielded higher sensitivity (85-100% vs. 72-100%) and specificity (89-100% vs. 84-100%) for diagnosis of glaucoma. CONCLUSION: RNFL thickness remains significantly better than 3D NRR thickness in terms of glaucoma-diagnostic capability in HD-OCT.
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic capability of three-dimensional (3D) neuro-retinal rim thickness (NRR) with existing optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) scan parameters using high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Based on the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), the 152 subjects were categorized into mild (MD > - 6 dB, 100), moderate (MD - 6 to - 12 dB, 26), and severe (MD < - 12 dB, 26) glaucoma. The HD-OCT values of NRR, RNFL and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses, along with those of other parameters (rim area, disc area) were obtained, and the average NRR thickness was calculated. RESULTS: For all of the HD-OCT parameters, RNFL thickness showed a higher area under the ROC (AUROC) curve (range: 0.937-1.000) than did NRR thickness (range: 0.827-1.000). There were significant RNFL, NRR, and GCIPL AUROC curve differences among the mild, moderate and severe glaucoma groups. RNFL thickness for mild glaucoma showed a significantly larger area than did NRR thickness [area difference: 0.110 (± 0.025); p value < 0.0001). Furthermore, RNFL relative to NRR thickness yielded higher sensitivity (85-100% vs. 72-100%) and specificity (89-100% vs. 84-100%) for diagnosis of glaucoma. CONCLUSION: RNFL thickness remains significantly better than 3D NRR thickness in terms of glaucoma-diagnostic capability in HD-OCT.
Entities:
Keywords:
End point of Bruch`s membrane; High-definition optical coherence tomography; Three-dimensional neuro-retinal rim thickness mapping; Unilateral open-angle glaucoma; Vitreo-retinal interface
Authors: Lindsay A Rhodes; Carrie E Huisingh; Adam E Quinn; Gerald McGwin; Frank LaRussa; Daniel Box; Cynthia Owsley; Christopher A Girkin Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2002-06
Authors: Jonas M D Gmeiner; Wolfgang A Schrems; Christian Y Mardin; Robert Laemmer; Friedrich E Kruse; Laura M Schrems-Hoesl Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yih-Chung Tham; Xiang Li; Tien Y Wong; Harry A Quigley; Tin Aung; Ching-Yu Cheng Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Joel S Schuman; Gadi Wollstein; Taline Farra; Ellen Hertzmark; Ali Aydin; James G Fujimoto; Lelia A Paunescu Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Akram Belghith; Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Naama Hammel; Zhiyong Yang; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Brad Fortune; Christy Hardin; Juan Reynaud; Grant Cull; Hongli Yang; Lin Wang; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799