Literature DB >> 27943622

Uncertainty quantification of inflow boundary condition and proximal arterial stiffness-coupled effect on pulse wave propagation in a vascular network.

Antoine Brault1, Laurent Dumas2, Didier Lucor3.   

Abstract

This work aims at quantifying the effect of inherent uncertainties from cardiac output on the sensitivity of a human compliant arterial network response based on stochastic simulations of a reduced-order pulse wave propagation model. A simple pulsatile output form is used to reproduce the most relevant cardiac features with a minimum number of parameters associated with left ventricle dynamics. Another source of significant uncertainty is the spatial heterogeneity of the aortic compliance, which plays a key role in the propagation and damping of pulse waves generated at each cardiac cycle. A continuous representation of the aortic stiffness in the form of a generic random field of prescribed spatial correlation is then considered. Making use of a stochastic sparse pseudospectral method, we investigate the sensitivity of the pulse pressure and waves reflection magnitude over the arterial tree with respect to the different model uncertainties. Results indicate that uncertainties related to the shape and magnitude of the prescribed inlet flow in the proximal aorta can lead to potent variation of both the mean value and standard deviation of blood flow velocity and pressure dynamics due to the interaction of different wave propagation and reflection features. Lack of accurate knowledge in the stiffness properties of the aorta, resulting in uncertainty in the pulse wave velocity in that region, strongly modifies the statistical response, with a global increase in the variability of the quantities of interest and a spatial redistribution of the regions of higher sensitivity. These results will provide some guidance in clinical data acquisition and future coupling of arterial pulse wave propagation reduced-order model with more complex beating heart models.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational hemodynamics; pulse wave propagation; sensitivity analysis; systemic circulation; uncertainty quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27943622     DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  6 in total

1.  Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Justin S Tran; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.756

2.  Semi-intrusive multiscale metamodelling uncertainty quantification with application to a model of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  A Nikishova; L Veen; P Zun; A G Hoekstra
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Uncertainty Quantification in a Patient-Specific One-Dimensional Arterial Network Model: EnKF-Based Inflow Estimator.

Authors:  Andrea Arnold; Christina Battista; Daniel Bia; Yanina Zócalo German; Ricardo L Armentano; Hien Tran; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantif       Date:  2017-02-22

4.  Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Authors:  Casey M Fleeter; Gianluca Geraci; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.756

5.  The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.

Authors:  Jongmin Seo; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Uncertainty quantification in cerebral circulation simulations focusing on the collateral flow: Surrogate model approach with machine learning.

Authors:  Changyoung Yuhn; Marie Oshima; Yan Chen; Motoharu Hayakawa; Shigeki Yamada
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.