Literature DB >> 29882508

Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group.

Stephanie James1, Frank H Collins2, Philip A Welkhoff3, Claudia Emerson4, H Charles J Godfray5, Michael Gottlieb1, Brian Greenwood6, Steve W Lindsay7, Charles M Mbogo8, Fredros O Okumu9,10,11, Hector Quemada12, Moussa Savadogo13, Jerome A Singh14, Karen H Tountas1, Yeya T Touré15.   

Abstract

Gene drive technology offers the promise for a high-impact, cost-effective, and durable method to control malaria transmission that would make a significant contribution to elimination. Gene drive systems, such as those based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein, have the potential to spread beneficial traits through interbreeding populations of malaria mosquitoes. However, the characteristics of this technology have raised concerns that necessitate careful consideration of the product development pathway. A multidisciplinary working group considered the implications of low-threshold gene drive systems on the development pathway described in the World Health Organization Guidance Framework for testing genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes, focusing on reduction of malaria transmission by Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes in Africa as a case study. The group developed recommendations for the safe and ethical testing of gene drive mosquitoes, drawing on prior experience with other vector control tools, GM organisms, and biocontrol agents. These recommendations are organized according to a testing plan that seeks to maximize safety by incrementally increasing the degree of human and environmental exposure to the investigational product. As with biocontrol agents, emphasis is placed on safety evaluation at the end of physically confined laboratory testing as a major decision point for whether to enter field testing. Progression through the testing pathway is based on fulfillment of safety and efficacy criteria, and is subject to regulatory and ethical approvals, as well as social acceptance. The working group identified several resources that were considered important to support responsible field testing of gene drive mosquitoes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29882508      PMCID: PMC5993454          DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  81 in total

1.  Guidance for contained field trials of vector mosquitoes engineered to contain a gene drive system: recommendations of a scientific working group.

Authors:  M Benedict; P D'Abbs; S Dobson; M Gottlieb; L Harrington; S Higgs; A James; S James; B Knols; J Lavery; S O'Neill; T Scott; W Takken; Y Toure
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.133

2.  Cas9-triggered chain ablation of cas9 as a gene drive brake.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Liqun Luo; Xiaojing J Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review.

Authors:  Celia A Brown; Richard J Lilford
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Specific antibodies to Anopheles gSG6-P1 salivary peptide to assess early childhood exposure to malaria vector bites.

Authors:  Papa M Drame; Anne Poinsignon; Célia Dechavanne; Gilles Cottrell; Manon Farce; Rodolphe Ladekpo; Achille Massougbodji; Sylvie Cornélie; David Courtin; Florence Migot-Nabias; André Garcia; Franck Remoué
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015.

Authors:  S Bhatt; D J Weiss; E Cameron; D Bisanzio; B Mappin; U Dalrymple; K Battle; C L Moyes; A Henry; P A Eckhoff; E A Wenger; O Briët; M A Penny; T A Smith; A Bennett; J Yukich; T P Eisele; J T Griffin; C A Fergus; M Lynch; F Lindgren; J M Cohen; C L J Murray; D L Smith; S I Hay; R E Cibulskis; P W Gething
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Results from the Workshop "Problem Formulation for the Use of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes".

Authors:  Andrew Roberts; Paulo Paes de Andrade; Fredros Okumu; Hector Quemada; Moussa Savadogo; Jerome Amir Singh; Stephanie James
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 7.  Framework for rapid assessment and adoption of new vector control tools.

Authors:  John Vontas; Sarah Moore; Immo Kleinschmidt; Hilary Ranson; Steve Lindsay; Christian Lengeler; Nicholas Hamon; Tom McLean; Janet Hemingway
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2014-03-19

8.  Limited dengue virus replication in field-collected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Tasnim Zakir; Thomas Walker; Jean Popovici; Alyssa T Pyke; Andrew van den Hurk; Elizabeth A McGraw; Scott L O'Neill
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-02-20

9.  Stability of the wMel Wolbachia Infection following invasion into Aedes aegypti populations.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Inaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe; Ashley G Callahan; Ben L Phillips; Katrina Billington; Jason K Axford; Brian Montgomery; Andrew P Turley; Scott L O'Neill
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-09-11

10.  Risk Associated with the Release of Wolbachia-Infected Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes into the Environment in an Effort to Control Dengue.

Authors:  Justine V Murray; Cassie C Jansen; Paul De Barro
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-03-22
View more
  52 in total

1.  Reflections from an old Queenslander: can rear and release strategies be the next great era of vector control?

Authors:  Scott A Ritchie; Kyran M Staunton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Self-destructing mosquitoes and sterilized rodents: the promise of gene drives.

Authors:  Megan Scudellari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The ecology and evolution of microbial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Stineke van Houte; Sylvain Gandon; Rachel Whitaker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science.

Authors:  Dominique Brossard; Pam Belluck; Fred Gould; Christopher D Wirz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Systematic identification of plausible pathways to potential harm via problem formulation for investigational releases of a population suppression gene drive to control the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae in West Africa.

Authors:  John B Connolly; John D Mumford; Silke Fuchs; Geoff Turner; Camilla Beech; Ace R North; Austin Burt
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Two unresolved issues in community engagement for field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Progress towards engineering gene drives for population control.

Authors:  Robyn R Raban; John M Marshall; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  Public health concerns over gene-drive mosquitoes: will future use of gene-drive snails for schistosomiasis control gain increased level of community acceptance?

Authors:  Damilare O Famakinde
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Control of malaria-transmitting mosquitoes using gene drives.

Authors:  Tony Nolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  MGDrivE 2: A simulation framework for gene drive systems incorporating seasonality and epidemiological dynamics.

Authors:  Sean L Wu; Jared B Bennett; Héctor M Sánchez C; Andrew J Dolgert; Tomás M León; John M Marshall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.