Paolo Palma1,2, Paola Zangari3,4, Claudia Alteri5, Hyppolite K Tchidjou3, Emma Concetta Manno3, Giuseppina Liuzzi6, Carlo Federico Perno5, Paolo Rossi3, Ada Bertoli5, Stefania Bernardi7. 1. Academic Department of Pediatrics, Unit of Immune and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, P.zza Sant'Onofrio, 4-00165, Rome, Italy. paolo.palma@opbg.net. 2. Research Unit in Congenital and Perinatal Infections, Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy. paolo.palma@opbg.net. 3. Academic Department of Pediatrics, Unit of Immune and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, P.zza Sant'Onofrio, 4-00165, Rome, Italy. 4. Research Unit in Congenital and Perinatal Infections, Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy. 6. Clinical Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases 'L. Spallanzani', Rome, Italy. 7. Academic Department of Pediatrics, Unit of Immune and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, P.zza Sant'Onofrio, 4-00165, Rome, Italy. stefania.bernardi@opbg.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV genetic diversity implicates major challenges for the control of viral infection by the immune system and for the identification of an effective immunotherapeutic strategy. With the present case report we underline as HIV evolution could be effectively halted by early antiretroviral treatment (eART). Few cases supported this evidence due to the difficulty of performing amplification and sequencing analysis in long-term viral suppressed patients. Here, we reported the case of limited HIV-1 viral evolution over time in a successful early treated child. CASE PRESENTATION: A perinatally HIV-1 infected infant was treated within 7 weeks of age with zidovudine, lamivudine, nevirapine and lopinavir/ritonavir. At antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation HIV-1 viral load (VL) and CD4 percentage were >500,000 copies/ml and 35%, respectively. Plasma genotypic resistance test showed a wild-type virus. The child reached VL undetectability after 33 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) since he maintained a stable VL <40copies/ml. After 116 weeks on ART we were able to perform amplification and sequencing assay on the plasma virus. At this time VL was <40 copies/ml and CD4 percentage was 40%. Again the genotypic resistance test revealed a wild-type virus. The phylogenetic analysis performed on the HIV-1 pol sequences of the mother and the child revealed that sequences clustered with C subtype reference strains and formed a monophyletic cluster distinct from the other C sequences included in the analysis (bootstrap value >90%). Any major evolutionary divergence was detected. CONCLUSIONS: eART limits the viral evolution avoiding the emergence of new viral variants. This result may have important implications in host immune control and may sustain the challenge search of new personalized immunotherapeutic approaches to achieve a prolonged viral remission.
BACKGROUND: HIV genetic diversity implicates major challenges for the control of viral infection by the immune system and for the identification of an effective immunotherapeutic strategy. With the present case report we underline as HIV evolution could be effectively halted by early antiretroviral treatment (eART). Few cases supported this evidence due to the difficulty of performing amplification and sequencing analysis in long-term viral suppressed patients. Here, we reported the case of limited HIV-1 viral evolution over time in a successful early treated child. CASE PRESENTATION: A perinatally HIV-1 infected infant was treated within 7 weeks of age with zidovudine, lamivudine, nevirapine and lopinavir/ritonavir. At antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation HIV-1 viral load (VL) and CD4 percentage were >500,000 copies/ml and 35%, respectively. Plasma genotypic resistance test showed a wild-type virus. The child reached VL undetectability after 33 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) since he maintained a stable VL <40copies/ml. After 116 weeks on ART we were able to perform amplification and sequencing assay on the plasma virus. At this time VL was <40 copies/ml and CD4 percentage was 40%. Again the genotypic resistance test revealed a wild-type virus. The phylogenetic analysis performed on the HIV-1 pol sequences of the mother and the child revealed that sequences clustered with C subtype reference strains and formed a monophyletic cluster distinct from the other C sequences included in the analysis (bootstrap value >90%). Any major evolutionary divergence was detected. CONCLUSIONS: eART limits the viral evolution avoiding the emergence of new viral variants. This result may have important implications in host immune control and may sustain the challenge search of new personalized immunotherapeutic approaches to achieve a prolonged viral remission.
Entities:
Keywords:
Children; Early antiretroviral treatment; HIV; Immunotherapy; Viral evolution
HIV-1 infection is characterized by broad genetic diversity and rapid evolution that influence the pathogenesis, transmission and clinical management of the infection [1]. Such high genetic variability represents also a major drawback in the identification of an effective immunotherapeutic strategy. Genetically homogeneous virus population has been found at birth in perinatally HIV infectedinfants, in contrast to the heterogeneous virus populations often found in their infected mothers [2]. Similarly, a uniform viral population has been observed in newly infected adults short after transmission [3]. These observations led to the hypothesis that an early intervention with cART could limit viral evolution. Indeed, the homogeneity of viral sequences in HIV infected individuals treated during early infection compared with higher diversity in late treated patients has been recently confirmed in adult populations [4-6]. Although the relationship between the viral evolutionary dynamics and timing of treatment has been explored to some extent in adult less is known about this relationship during paediatric HIV-1 infection [7]. This is mostly due to the difficulty of performing amplification and sequencing analysis with limited volume of blood in perinatally HIV infectedchildren on viral suppression since infancy [7-9]. Here, we reported the case of limited HIV-1 viral evolution in an early treated child with stable viral VL <40 copies/ml in which we were able to amplify and analyze HIV-1 pol sequences at different time points.
Case report
An infant was born by elective caesarean section, two hours after membrane rupture at 38 weeks of gestation to an HIV-1 infectedwoman who started a first line ART with lamivudine, zidovudine and lopinavir/ritonavir 1 week before the delivery. Maternal VL at delivery was 203,686 copies/ml. Intrapartum antiretroviral prophylaxis with intravenous zidovudine was administered and the child started postnatal prophylaxis with zidovudine at 6 h of birth for 6 weeks. Breastfeeding was avoided. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for genes GAG, POL, and ENV performed at 6 weeks of life was positive and his HIV-RNA VL was >500,000 copies/mL with CD4 lymphocyte percentage 35%.The genotypic resistance test from both mother and child didn’t show any transmitted drug resistance for PI, NRTI or NNRTI drug classes. Based on these results, at 7 weeks of age cART was initiated. A four-drug regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine, nevirapine and lopinavir/ritonavir was selected according to the results of genotypic resistance test. Plasma VL remained detectable till the 32th week from starting therapy despite an adequate maternal compliance with infant’s drugs and on subsequent medical check the baby maintained undetectable HIV-1 RNA and CD4 T count within the range for age. At 48 weeks from starting therapy, ART was simplified by suspending protease inhibitor. Concurrently to the VL undetectability, HIV-1 antibodies were negative in the child at 26, and 31 months of age. After 116 weeks on cART, we were able to perform viral isolation and amplification. At this time VL was stable <40 copies/ml (ABBOTT) and CD4 percentage was 40%. A genotypic resistance test for pol was re-performed and no-drug resistance was found for a second time.In order to clarify the epidemiological linkage and the evolutionary divergence between mother and childHIV-1 strains, a phylogenetic analysis was carried out on pol sequences performed at different time points. In particular, one pol sequence from plasma HIV-RNA and one pol sequence from PBMCs HIV-1 DNA obtained at the time of partum and 2 years later, respectively, were available for the mother. Two plasma pol sequences at the time of birth and 2 years later (corresponding to the 116 week of ART), were available for the child. To define the HIV-1 subtype and the sequence inter-relationships between the mother/child pair a neighbor joining (NJ) tree [10] was constructed using a first dataset containing all pol sequences obtained from the mother and child, HIV pol reference sequences, and 396 full-length pol sequences (1,200 bp) obtained from routine laboratory testing at the Virology Unit Hospital “Tor Vergata”, from January 2012 to December 2014. The reliability of the branching orders was assessed by bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. Genetic distances were calculated using MEGA 6.0 based on Kimura-2 parameter (K2P) model [11]. To avoid potential contaminations identical sequences amplified in the same run were excluded. Phylogenetic analysis by NJ method revealed that the HIV-1 pol sequences from the mother/child pair clustered together with C subtype reference strains, forming a monophyletic cluster distinct from the other C sequences included in the analysis (bootstrap value >90%) (Additional file 1: Figure S1).Once the HIV-1 subtype was assigned, the statistical robustness of the monophyletic clade was confirmed also by the ML tree, containing only C reference sequences and 98 C isolates obtained from routine laboratory testing (bootstrap value >85%) (Fig. 1). This was inferred by the PhyML program (http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/phyml/) using the GTR + I + Γ nucleotide substitution model. The simplest model that adequately fitted the sequence data was selected according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) included in the MEGA package (version 6.0). Robustness of the phylogenetic clades was evaluated by bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates). The tree was rooted using a midpoint rooting. Again, the 4 pol sequences from the mother/child pair form a monophyletic cluster distinct from all the other C sequences included in the analysis (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed on the pol gene sequences of 102 isolates and additional 4 subtype C references. The tree was rooted using the midpoint rooting method. Branch lenghts were estimated with the best fitting nucleotide substitution model (GTR + G + I) according to a hierarchical likelihood ratio test. The bar at the bottom indicating 0.03 nucleotide substitution per site. The astericks (*) along a branch represent bootstrap support >85%. The 4 C sequences belonged to mother to child transmission chain are shown in red and the cluster involving them is in the gray box. The cartoon summarizes the timing of sampling
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed on the pol gene sequences of 102 isolates and additional 4 subtype C references. The tree was rooted using the midpoint rooting method. Branch lenghts were estimated with the best fitting nucleotide substitution model (GTR + G + I) according to a hierarchical likelihood ratio test. The bar at the bottom indicating 0.03 nucleotide substitution per site. The astericks (*) along a branch represent bootstrap support >85%. The 4 C sequences belonged to mother to child transmission chain are shown in red and the cluster involving them is in the gray box. The cartoon summarizes the timing of samplingThe extremely low mean genetic distance in pol region characterizing pol sequences from the mother/child pair compared to the ones from local unrelated non-cluster C controls (pol: 0.0017, standard error [SE]:±0.001 vs 0.081, standard error [SE]:±0.004) confirmed the high homology among mother and child sequences.The phylogenetic analysis also revealed that the 2 sequences of the child clustered together and showed a minimal evolutionary divergence among them (mean ± SE:0.000090 ± 000087). This minimal evolutionary divergence is sustained by a single nucleotide substitution at position 231 of RT (C to T [F77F]).
Conclusions
HIV-1 populations in the blood of the newly infected individuals are largely homogenous and evolve in a manner consistent with exponential viral replication [3]. Thus, starting antiretroviral treatment during acute infection can limit HIV viral evolution avoiding the emergence of new viral variants. Recent studies in HIV infected adults support this evidence [4-6] but few data are available in the pediatric setting [7]. The present case report highlights the impact of eART in limiting HIV genetic diversity over time in a perinatally HIV infectedchild on stable viral suppression (<40 copies/ml). Our result confirming those recently published in adults [4-6], may have important implications for the future defining of a personalized immunotherapeutic approach [12]. To date, eART alone is not sufficient to induce a sustained viral remission and additional immunotherapeutic interventions should be considered [12]. An effective early cART can prevent HIV-1 evolution modifying the natural history of the infection from a rapidly evolving viral infection to a state of clonal persistence with a single or a few variants. This restricted pool of variants can be more easily targeted by autologous cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) [13] or therapeutic vaccines induced strategies [12, 14]. Further studies are needed in order to determine whether limited HIV-1 evolution overtime can be associated with a higher likelihood to achieve viral remission [9].
Authors: G Scarlatti; T Leitner; E Halapi; J Wahlberg; M Jansson; H Wigzell; E M Fenyö; J Albert; M Uhlén; P Rossi Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 1993-10-29 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Deborah Persaud; Stuart C Ray; Joleen Kajdas; Aima Ahonkhai; George K Siberry; Kimberly Ferguson; Carrie Ziemniak; Thomas C Quinn; Joseph P Casazza; Steven Zeichner; Stephen J Gange; Douglas C Watson Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Mary F Kearney; Jonathan Spindler; Wei Shao; Sloane Yu; Elizabeth M Anderson; Angeline O'Shea; Catherine Rehm; Carry Poethke; Nicholas Kovacs; John W Mellors; John M Coffin; Frank Maldarelli Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: P Palma; C Foster; P Rojo; P Zangari; A Yates; N Cotugno; N Klein; K Luzuriaga; S Pahwa; E Nastouli; D M Gibb; W Borkowsky; S Bernardi; V Calvez; E Manno; Nadia Mora; A Compagnucci; B Wahren; Má Muñoz-Fernández; A De Rossi; J Ananworanich; D Pillay; C Giaquinto; P Rossi Journal: J Virus Erad Date: 2015-06-30
Authors: Miguel A Garcia-Knight; Jennifer Slyker; Barbara Lohman Payne; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Thushan I de Silva; Bhavna Chohan; Brian Khasimwa; Dorothy Mbori-Ngacha; Grace John-Stewart; Sarah L Rowland-Jones; Joakim Esbjörnsson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lina Josefsson; Susanne von Stockenstrom; Nuno R Faria; Elizabeth Sinclair; Peter Bacchetti; Maudi Killian; Lorrie Epling; Alice Tan; Terence Ho; Philippe Lemey; Wei Shao; Peter W Hunt; Ma Somsouk; Will Wylie; Daniel C Douek; Lisa Loeb; Jeff Custer; Rebecca Hoh; Lauren Poole; Steven G Deeks; Frederick Hecht; Sarah Palmer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alfredo Tagarro; Man Chan; Paola Zangari; Bridget Ferns; Caroline Foster; Anita De Rossi; Eleni Nastouli; María A Muñoz-Fernández; Diana Gibb; Paolo Rossi; Carlo Giaquinto; Abdel Babiker; Claudia Fortuny; Riccardo Freguja; Nicola Cotugno; Ali Judd; Antoni Noguera-Julian; María Luisa Navarro; María José Mellado; Nigel Klein; Paolo Palma; Pablo Rojo Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Vinicius A Vieira; Nicholas Herbert; Gabriela Cromhout; Emily Adland; Philip Goulder Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Sonia Zicari; Libera Sessa; Nicola Cotugno; Alessandra Ruggiero; Elena Morrocchi; Carlo Concato; Salvatore Rocca; Paola Zangari; Emma C Manno; Paolo Palma Journal: Viruses Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Andrew Musick; Jonathan Spindler; Eli Boritz; Liliana Pérez; Daniel Crespo-Vélez; Sean C Patro; Michele D Sobolewski; Michael J Bale; Carolyn Reid; Brandon F Keele; Adam Capoferri; Wei Shao; Ann Wiegand; Francesco R Simonetti; John W Mellors; Stephen H Hughes; John M Coffin; Frank Maldarelli; Mary F Kearney Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Jane R Millar; Nomonde Bengu; Vinicius A Vieira; Emily Adland; Julia Roider; Maximilian Muenchhoff; Rowena Fillis; Kenneth Sprenger; Vuyokazi Ntlantsana; Isabella Fatti; Moherndran Archary; Andreas Groll; Nasreen Ismail; Maria C García-Guerrero; Philippa C Matthews; Thumbi Ndung'u; Maria C Puertas; Javier Martinez-Picado; Philip Goulder Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Margherita Doria; Sonia Zicari; Nicola Cotugno; Sara Domínguez-Rodríguez; Alessandra Ruggiero; Giuseppe R Pascucci; Alfredo Tagarro; Pablo Rojo Conejo; Eleni Nastouli; Kathleen Gärtner; Mark Cameron; Brian Richardson; Caroline Foster; Sion L Williams; Stefano Rinaldi; Anita De Rossi; Carlo Giaquinto; Paolo Rossi; Savita Pahwa; Paolo Palma Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 5.396