| Literature DB >> 34235857 |
Margherita Doria1, Sonia Zicari2, Nicola Cotugno2,3, Sara Domínguez-Rodríguez4, Alessandra Ruggiero1, Giuseppe R Pascucci1,2,3, Alfredo Tagarro4, Pablo Rojo Conejo4, Eleni Nastouli5, Kathleen Gärtner6, Mark Cameron7, Brian Richardson7, Caroline Foster8, Sion L Williams9, Stefano Rinaldi9, Anita De Rossi10,11, Carlo Giaquinto12, Paolo Rossi1,2,3, Savita Pahwa9, Paolo Palma1,2,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: HIV infection causes pathological changes in the natural killer (NK) cell compartment that can be only partially restored by antiretroviral therapy (ART). We investigated NK cells phenotype and function in children with perinatally acquired HIV (PHIV) and long-term viral control (five years) due to effective ART in a multicentre cross-sectional European study (CARMA, EPIICAL consortium). The impact of age at ART start and viral reservoir was also evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: ARV; HIV care continuum; cohort studies; immunology; paediatrics; viral suppression
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34235857 PMCID: PMC8264399 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int AIDS Soc ISSN: 1758-2652 Impact factor: 5.396
Characteristics of the study population
| LT (n = 9) | ET (n = 29) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female (N) | 3/6 | 9/20 | 1.0000 |
| At ART start | |||
| Age (days) | 571 (254.5 to 630.5) | 110 (6.5 to 140) |
|
| %CD4+ T cells | 24 (17 to 35) | 31 (20 to 43) | 0.4028 |
| Plasma HIV RNA (copies/µL) | 181.1 (55.6 to 620) | 110 (10.2 to 500) | 0.7295 |
| Time to suppression (months) | 1.6 (0.4 to 2.8) | 2.5 (0.3 to 5.2) | 0.3119 |
| At analysis | |||
| Age (years) | 9 (7.5 to 17.5) | 13 (9 to 16.5) | 0.4706 |
| % CD4+ T cells | 42 (34 to 46) | 39 (31.5 to 47) | 0.7872 |
| Plasma HIV RNA (copies/mL) | <40 | <40 | |
| HIV DNA (copies/106 PBMCs) | 112.4 (48.5 to 260.6) | 33.1 (0 to 74.7) |
|
| Time on ART (years) | 8 (6 to 16) | 13 (9 to 16) | 0.2643 |
| CMV serology (N positive/negative) | 8/1 | 20/9 | 0.3958 |
Values are expressed as medians (interquartlile range, IQR) except number of individuals (N). CMV, cytomegalovirus. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the CARMA cohort divided into Early Treated patients (ET) and Late Treated patients (LT). p values in bold reached statistical significance (<0.05).
Calculated by Mann–Whitney U‐test; for categorical variables, Fisher's exact test was used.
Figure 1(A) The gating strategy to identify natural killer (NK) cells and their CD56bright, CD56dim and CD56neg subsets is shown in ET versus LT. (B) Frequency of total NK in ET versus LT. (C) Frequency CD56bright, CD56dim and CD56neg comparing ET and LT. In blue ET, in red LT.
Figure 2(A) Frequency of NK expressing NKG2D, DNAM‐1, NKp46 and perforin. (B) Frequency of NK expressing NKG2A, NKG2C, CD57 and KIR in CMV+ patients. (C) Histograms showing the expression of NKG2D, NKp46, DNAM‐1, perforin, NKG2A, NKG2C, CD57 and KIRmix on NK (open histograms) as well as control IgG signal (dashed lines) are shown in the left panel. The gating strategy used to identify different maturation subsets (Early differentiated (ED), Mature (M) and Memory‐like (ML)) based on NKG2A, NKG2C, CD57 and KIR expression among gated CD56dim cells is shown on the right panel. (D) Distribution of CD56dim ED, CD56dim M and CD56dim ML in CMV+ patients. In blue ET, in red LT.
Figure 3(A) Frequency of NK expressing CD107a in cells not‐stimulated (ns) or stimulated with K562 target in ET versus LT. (B) Frequency of NK expressing IFN‐γ in cells not‐stimulated or stimulated with a cytokine cocktail (IL‐12, IL‐15, IL‐18) in ET versus LT. (C) Multivariable Poisson regression model showing the association between CD107a+ NK ns or stimulated with K562 target with HIV reservoir in ET versus LT. (D) Multivariable Poisson regression model showing the association between IFN‐γ+ NK ns or stimulated with cytokines with HIV reservoir in ET versus LT.
A unit change in the NK parameter is associated with the indicated % change in HIV‐1 DNA (e.g. 1‐unit increase in NK cell % of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) is associated with 4% decrease in HIV DNA considering all patients and this effect is 6% higher in ET)
| NK parameters | LT | ET | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | N | % Diff | β (95% CI) |
| N | % Diff | β (95% CI) |
| |
| % of PBLs | 38 | 9 | −4 | 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98) |
| 29 | 6 | 1.06 (1.04 to 1.10) |
|
| CD56bright % | 38 | 9 | −2 | 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) |
| 29 | 0.06 | 1.0006 (0.99 to 1.01) | 0.930 |
| CD56dim % | 38 | 9 | −4 | 0.96 (0.96 to 0.98) |
| 29 | 4 | 1.04 (1.03 to 1.06) |
|
| CD56neg % | 38 | 9 | 3 | 1.03 (1.02 to 1.04) |
| 29 | −1 | 0.99 (0.97 to 0.99) |
|
| NKG2D+ % | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1.01 (1.00 to 1.01) |
| 16 | 0.04 | 1.0004 (0.99 to 1.01) | 0.276 |
| NKp46+ % | 23 | 7 | 4 | 1.04 (1.04 to 1.05) |
| 16 | −2 | 0.98 (0.97 to 0.98) |
|
| DNAM‐1+ % | 23 | 7 | −5 | 0.95 (0.95 to 0.96) |
| 16 | 6 | 1.06 (1.06 to 1.08) |
|
| Perforin+ % | 23 | 7 | −11 | 0.89 (0.86 to 0.90) |
| 16 | 11 | 1.11 (1.09 to 1.14) |
|
| Perforin MFI × 10−3 | 23 | 7 | 0.01 | 1.0001 (1.0001 to 1.0001) |
| 16 | −1 | 0.99 (0.99 to 0.99) |
|
| % of CD56dima | |||||||||
| Early differentiated | 28 | 8 | 2 | 1.02 (1.02 to 1.02) |
| 20 | 0 | 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00) | 0.662 |
| Mature | 28 | 8 | −3 | 0.97 (0.97 to 0.98) |
| 20 | 0.3 | 1.003 (0.996 to 1.01) | 0.379 |
| Memory‐like | 28 | 8 | 0.1 | 1.001 (0.996 to 1.01) | 0.561 | 20 | −3 | 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98) |
|
| CD107a+ % | |||||||||
| ns | 35 | 8 | 8 | 1.08 (1.07 to 1.09) |
| 27 | −3 | 0.97 (0.96 to 0.99) |
|
| +K562 | 35 | 8 | 2 | 1.02 (1.01 to 1.02) |
| 27 | 2 | 1.02 (1.01 to 1.03) |
|
| IFNγ+ % | |||||||||
| ns | 22 | 9 | 9 | 1.09 (1.08 to 1.10) |
| 13 | −7 | 0.93 (0.88 to 0.99) |
|
| +IL‐12/IL‐15/IL‐18 | 22 | 9 | 0.4 | 1.004 (0.99 to 1.02) | 0.425 | 13 | 6 | 1.06 (1.04 to 1.08) |
|
The β estimates adjusted for the age groups (ET/LT), % CD4+ T‐cells, and HIV RNA copies/µL at baseline. The % CD107a+ and IFN‐γ+ NK cells were evaluated in functional assays described in Figure 3. % Diff, difference in total HIV DNA (copies/106 PBMCs). β, regression coefficient (95% CI, confidence interval).
Only CMV+ patients were considered to test association with CD56dim maturation subsets. ns, non‐stimulated. N= number of patients analysed.
p values in bold reached statistical significance (<0.05).
Figure 4Multivariable Poisson regression model showing the association between the HIV reservoir and (A) % NK (of PBLs); (B) CD56bright; CD56dim; CD56neg; (C) %NKp46; %NKG2D; %DNAM‐1 in ET versus LT.
Figure 5Pathway analysis applied to (A) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) up‐regulated (UP) and (B) DEGs down‐regulated (DW) in ET versus LT patients. (C) Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity pathway depicting in red up‐regulated DEGs and in blue down‐regulated DEGs with a significant p‐value (<0.05) in ET versus LT.