Context:Pioglitazone reduces cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic patients after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) but is associated with increased risk for bone fracture. Objective: To characterize fractures associated with pioglitazone by location, mechanism, severity, timing, and sex. Design, Setting, and Patients: Patients were 3876 nondiabetic participants in the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke trial randomized topioglitazone or placebo and followed for a median of 4.8 years. Fractures were identified through quarterly interviews. Results: At 5 years, the increment in fracture risk between pioglitazone and placebo groups was 4.9% [13.6% vs 8.8%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24 to 1.89). In each group, ∼80% of fractures were low energy (i.e., resulted from fall) and 45% were serious (i.e., required surgery or hospitalization). For serious fractures most likely to be related to pioglitazone (low energy, nonpathological), the risk increment was 1.6% (4.7% vs 3.1%; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.09). Increased risk for any fracture was observed in men (9.4% vs 5.2%; HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.48) and women (14.9% vs 11.6%; HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.78; interaction P = 0.13). Conclusions: Fractures affected 8.8% of placebo-treated patients within 5 years after an ischemic stroke or TIA. Pioglitazone increased the absolute fracture risk by 1.6% to 4.9% and the relative risk by 47% to 60%, depending on fracture classification. Our analysis suggests that treatments to improve bone health and prevent falls may help optimize the risk/benefit ratio for pioglitazone.
RCT Entities:
Context:Pioglitazone reduces cardiovascular risk in nondiabeticpatients after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) but is associated with increased risk for bone fracture. Objective: To characterize fractures associated with pioglitazone by location, mechanism, severity, timing, and sex. Design, Setting, and Patients: Patients were 3876 nondiabeticparticipants in the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke trial randomized to pioglitazone or placebo and followed for a median of 4.8 years. Fractures were identified through quarterly interviews. Results: At 5 years, the increment in fracture risk between pioglitazone and placebo groups was 4.9% [13.6% vs 8.8%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24 to 1.89). In each group, ∼80% of fractures were low energy (i.e., resulted from fall) and 45% were serious (i.e., required surgery or hospitalization). For serious fractures most likely to be related to pioglitazone (low energy, nonpathological), the risk increment was 1.6% (4.7% vs 3.1%; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.09). Increased risk for any fracture was observed in men (9.4% vs 5.2%; HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.48) and women (14.9% vs 11.6%; HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.78; interaction P = 0.13). Conclusions: Fractures affected 8.8% of placebo-treated patients within 5 years after an ischemic stroke or TIA. Pioglitazone increased the absolute fracture risk by 1.6% to 4.9% and the relative risk by 47% to 60%, depending on fracture classification. Our analysis suggests that treatments to improve bone health and prevent falls may help optimize the risk/benefit ratio for pioglitazone.
Authors: Wei Wei; Daniel Zeve; Xueqian Wang; Yang Du; Wei Tang; Paul C Dechow; Jonathan M Graff; Yihong Wan Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: M Alexandra Sorocéanu; Dengshun Miao; Xiu-Ying Bai; Hanyi Su; David Goltzman; Andrew C Karaplis Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Beata Lecka-Czernik; Elena J Moerman; David F Grant; Jürgen M Lehmann; Stavros C Manolagas; Robert L Jilka Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: P Benzinger; K Rapp; H H König; F Bleibler; C Globas; J Beyersmann; A Jaensch; C Becker; G Büchele Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Andrew Grey; Mark Bolland; Sheryl Fenwick; Anne Horne; Greg Gamble; Paul L Drury; Ian R Reid Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Philip D Home; Stuart J Pocock; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Paula S Curtis; Ramon Gomis; Markolf Hanefeld; Nigel P Jones; Michel Komajda; John J V McMurray Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Steven E Kahn; Bernard Zinman; John M Lachin; Steven M Haffner; William H Herman; Rury R Holman; Barbara G Kravitz; Dahong Yu; Mark A Heise; R Paul Aftring; Giancarlo Viberti Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Walter N Kernan; Catherine M Viscoli; Karen L Furie; Lawrence H Young; Silvio E Inzucchi; Mark Gorman; Peter D Guarino; Anne M Lovejoy; Peter N Peduzzi; Robin Conwit; Lawrence M Brass; Gregory G Schwartz; Harold P Adams; Leo Berger; Antonio Carolei; Wayne Clark; Bruce Coull; Gary A Ford; Dawn Kleindorfer; John R O'Leary; Mark W Parsons; Peter Ringleb; Souvik Sen; J David Spence; David Tanne; David Wang; Toni R Winder Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Catherine M Viscoli; David M Kent; Robin Conwit; Jennifer L Dearborn; Karen L Furie; Mark Gorman; Peter D Guarino; Silvio E Inzucchi; Amber Stuart; Lawrence H Young; Walter N Kernan Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Walter N Kernan; Catherine M Viscoli; Jennifer L Dearborn; David M Kent; Robin Conwit; Pierre Fayad; Karen L Furie; Mark Gorman; Peter D Guarino; Silvio E Inzucchi; Amber Stuart; Lawrence H Young Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 18.302