Literature DB >> 30580725

Scoring System to Optimize Pioglitazone Therapy After Stroke Based on Fracture Risk.

Catherine M Viscoli1, David M Kent2, Robin Conwit3, Jennifer L Dearborn4, Karen L Furie5, Mark Gorman6, Peter D Guarino7, Silvio E Inzucchi8, Amber Stuart9, Lawrence H Young10, Walter N Kernan1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- The insulin sensitizer, pioglitazone, reduces cardiovascular risk in patients after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack but increases bone fracture risk. We conducted a secondary analysis of the IRIS trial (Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke) to assess the effect of pretreatment risk for fracture on the net benefits of pioglitazone therapy. Methods- IRIS was a randomized placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone that enrolled patients with insulin resistance but without diabetes mellitus within 180 days of an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Participants were recruited at 179 international centers from February 2005 to January 2013 and followed for a median of 4.8 years. Fracture risk models were developed from patient characteristics at entry. Within fracture risk strata, we quantified the effects of pioglitazone compared with placebo by estimating the relative risks and absolute 5-year risk differences for fracture and stroke or myocardial infarction. Results- The fracture risk model included points for age, race-ethnicity, sex, body mass index, disability, and medications. The relative increment in fracture risk with pioglitazone was similar in the lower (<median point score) and higher (≥ median point score) risk strata. However, the absolute risk difference (ARD) for fracture was less in the low-risk group (5.8% in pioglitazone group versus 4.0% in placebo group; ARD, 1.8%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 4.4%) compared with high-risk group (18.0% versus 11.6%; ARD, 6.4%; 95% CI, 3.2% to 9.6%). Reductions in risk for stroke or myocardial infarction did not vary by fracture risk (low-risk ARD, -3.7%; high-risk ARD, -3.5%). In low-risk patients, pioglitazone prevented 2.0 strokes or myocardial infarctions for each fracture caused, compared with 0.5 among those at high risk. Conclusions- A simple point score identifying patients at low risk for fracture may assist in selecting patients with a favorable benefit-risk profile for pioglitazone therapy after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fractures, bone; insulin resistance; myocardial infarction; pioglitazone; risk; stroke

Year:  2018        PMID: 30580725      PMCID: PMC6557695          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  17 in total

Review 1.  Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event.

Authors:  D G Altman; P K Andersen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-04

2.  Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-22

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; A R Feinstein; T R Holford
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Pioglitazone for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke Trial.

Authors:  Catherine M Viscoli; Lawrence M Brass; Antonio Carolei; Robin Conwit; Gary A Ford; Karen L Furie; Mark Gorman; Peter D Guarino; Silvio E Inzucchi; Anne M Lovejoy; Mark W Parsons; Peter N Peduzzi; Peter A Ringleb; Gregory G Schwartz; J David Spence; David Tanne; Lawrence H Young; Walter N Kernan
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  The assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Brian P Gladnick; Eve Donnelly; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Adding injury to insult: fracture risk after stroke in veterans.

Authors:  Heather E Whitson; Carl F Pieper; Linda Sanders; Ronnie D Horner; Pamela W Duncan; Kenneth W Lyles
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Cardiovascular diseases and risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  Ulf Sennerby; Håkan Melhus; Rolf Gedeborg; Liisa Byberg; Hans Garmo; Anders Ahlbom; Nancy L Pedersen; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Heterogeneity of the baseline risk within patient populations of clinical trials: a proposed evaluation algorithm.

Authors:  J P Ioannidis; J Lau
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Authors:  Walter N Kernan; Catherine M Viscoli; Karen L Furie; Lawrence H Young; Silvio E Inzucchi; Mark Gorman; Peter D Guarino; Anne M Lovejoy; Peter N Peduzzi; Robin Conwit; Lawrence M Brass; Gregory G Schwartz; Harold P Adams; Leo Berger; Antonio Carolei; Wayne Clark; Bruce Coull; Gary A Ford; Dawn Kleindorfer; John R O'Leary; Mark W Parsons; Peter Ringleb; Souvik Sen; J David Spence; David Tanne; David Wang; Toni R Winder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects.

Authors:  David M Kent; Ewout Steyerberg; David van Klaveren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-10

2.  Fluoxetine in stroke (FOCUS) trial-reasons to be cheerful about antidepressants in stroke?

Authors:  Terence J Quinn
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

3.  The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration.

Authors:  David M Kent; David van Klaveren; Jessica K Paulus; Ralph D'Agostino; Steve Goodman; Rodney Hayward; John P A Ioannidis; Bray Patrick-Lake; Sally Morton; Michael Pencina; Gowri Raman; Joseph S Ross; Harry P Selker; Ravi Varadhan; Andrew Vickers; John B Wong; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 25.391

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.