Literature DB >> 32026779

Reducing the Burden of Diabetes Treatment: A Review of Low-cost Oral Hypoglycemic Medications.

Elizabeth M Vaughan1, Jaime J Rueda1, Susan L Samson2, David J Hyman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of individuals diagnosed with diabetes are low/middle income and may have access to only three of the 11 oral hypoglycemic medications (OHMs) due to cost: metformin intermediate release (IR) or extended release (ER), sulfonylureas (glimepiride, glipizide, glyburide), and pioglitazone. Sulfonylureas and pioglitazone have had significant controversy related to potential adverse events, but it remains unclear whether these negative outcomes are class, drug, or dose-related.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a narrative review of low-cost OHMs.
METHODS: We evaluated the maximum recommended (MAX) compared to the most effective (EFF) daily dose, time-to-peak change in HbA1c levels, and adverse events of low-cost oral hypoglycemic medications.
RESULTS: We found that the MAX was often greater than the EFF: metformin IR/ER (MAX: 2,550/2,000 mg, EFF: 1,500-2,000/1,500-2,000 mg), glipizide IR/ER (MAX: 40/20 mg, EFF: 20/5 mg), glyburide (MAX: 20 mg, EFF: 2.5-5.0 mg), pioglitazone (MAX: 45 mg, EFF: 45 mg). Time-to-peak change in HbA1c levels occurred at weeks 12-20 (sulfonylureas), 25-39 (metformin), and 25 (pioglitazone). Glimepiride was not associated with weight gain, hypoglycemia, or negative cardiovascular events relative to other sulfonylureas. Cardiovascular event rates did not increase with lower glyburide doses (p<0.05). Glimepiride and pioglitazone have been successfully used in renal impairment.
CONCLUSION: Metformin, glimepiride, and pioglitazone are safe and efficacious OHMs. Prescribing at the EFF rather than the MAX may avoid negative dose-related outcomes. OHMs should be evaluated as individual drugs, not generalized as a class, due to different dosing and adverse-event profiles; Glimepiride is the preferred sulfonylurea since it is not associated with the adverse events as others in its class. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; hypoglycemic medication; low-income or underserved; medication; metformin; sulfonylurea; thiazolidinediones

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32026779      PMCID: PMC7415714          DOI: 10.2174/1573399816666200206112318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev        ISSN: 1573-3998


  66 in total

1.  Low socioeconomic status is associated with increased risk for hypoglycemia in diabetes patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Seth A Berkowitz; Andrew J Karter; Courtney R Lyles; Jennifer Y Liu; Dean Schillinger; Nancy E Adler; Howard H Moffet; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-05

2.  Disparities in the Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes - United States, 1999-2002 and 2011-2014.

Authors:  Gloria L Beckles; Chiu-Fang Chou
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations.

Authors:  Andrew I Geller; Nadine Shehab; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Scott R Kegler; Kelly N Weidenbach; Gina J Ryan; Daniel S Budnitz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Effect of pioglitazone on body composition and energy expenditure: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven R Smith; Lilian De Jonge; Julia Volaufova; Yinmei Li; Hui Xie; George A Bray
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.694

5.  Effect of sulfonylurea dose escalation on hemoglobin A1c in Veterans Affairs patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kathryn M Hurren; Emily P Bartley; Jessica L O'Neill; David L Ronis
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon K Loke; Sonal Singh; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A dose-response study of glimepiride in patients with NIDDM who have previously received sulfonylurea agents. The Glimepiride Protocol #201 Study Group.

Authors:  R B Goldberg; S M Holvey; J Schneider
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Sulfonylureas as second line drugs in type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Antonios Douros; Sophie Dell'Aniello; Oriana Hoi Yun Yu; Kristian B Filion; Laurent Azoulay; Samy Suissa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-07-18

9.  Efficacy of oral versus insulin therapy for newly diagnosed diabetes in low-income settings.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Vaughan; Jennette P Moreno; David Hyman; Tzu-An Chen; John P Foreyt
Journal:  Arch Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017

Review 10.  Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Freek Fickweiler; Ward Fickweiler; Ewout Urbach
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trilobatin, a Natural Food Additive, Exerts Anti-Type 2 Diabetes Effect Mediated by Nrf2/ARE and IRS-1/GLUT2 Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Yan-Ling Shi; Yue-Ping Zhang; Huan Luo; Fan Xu; Jian-Mei Gao; Jing-Shan Shi; Qi-Hai Gong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 2.  Metformin: Sex/Gender Differences in Its Uses and Effects-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ioannis Ilias; Manfredi Rizzo; Lina Zabuliene
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.