Literature DB >> 27933808

Accurate Modeling of Scaffold Hopping Transformations in Drug Discovery.

Lingle Wang1, Yuqing Deng1, Yujie Wu1, Byungchan Kim1, David N LeBard1, Dan Wandschneider1, Mike Beachy1, Richard A Friesner2, Robert Abel1.   

Abstract

The accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energies remains a significant challenge of central importance in computational biophysics and structure-based drug design. Multiple recent advances including the development of greatly improved protein and ligand molecular mechanics force fields, more efficient enhanced sampling methods, and low-cost powerful GPU computing clusters have enabled accurate and reliable predictions of relative protein-ligand binding free energies through the free energy perturbation (FEP) methods. However, the existing FEP methods can only be used to calculate the relative binding free energies for R-group modifications or single-atom modifications and cannot be used to efficiently evaluate scaffold hopping modifications to a lead molecule. Scaffold hopping or core hopping, a very common design strategy in drug discovery projects, is critical not only in the early stages of a discovery campaign where novel active matter must be identified but also in lead optimization where the resolution of a variety of ADME/Tox problems may require identification of a novel core structure. In this paper, we introduce a method that enables theoretically rigorous, yet computationally tractable, relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations to be pursued for scaffold hopping modifications. We apply the method to six pharmaceutically interesting cases where diverse types of scaffold hopping modifications were required to identify the drug molecules ultimately sent into the clinic. For these six diverse cases, the predicted binding affinities were in close agreement with experiment, demonstrating the wide applicability and the significant impact Core Hopping FEP may provide in drug discovery projects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27933808     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  24 in total

1.  Blinded prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity using Amber thermodynamic integration for the 2018 D3R grand challenge 4.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Chuan Tian; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Robust Free Energy Perturbation Protocols for Creating Molecules in Solution.

Authors:  Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Ricardo Zarzuela; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Workflows and performances in the ranking prediction of 2016 D3R Grand Challenge 2: lessons learned from a collaborative effort.

Authors:  Ying-Duo Gao; Yuan Hu; Alejandro Crespo; Deping Wang; Kira A Armacost; James I Fells; Xavier Fradera; Hongwu Wang; Huijun Wang; Brad Sherborne; Andreas Verras; Zhengwei Peng
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Optimal designs for pairwise calculation: An application to free energy perturbation in minimizing prediction variability.

Authors:  Qingyi Yang; Woodrow Burchett; Gregory S Steeno; Shuai Liu; Mingjun Yang; David L Mobley; Xinjun Hou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Improving the Accuracy of Protein Thermostability Predictions for Single Point Mutations.

Authors:  Jianxin Duan; Dmitry Lupyan; Lingle Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Computing Relative Binding Affinity of Ligands to Receptor: An Effective Hybrid Single-Dual-Topology Free-Energy Perturbation Approach in NAMD.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Christophe Chipot; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator for Absolute and Relative Ligand Solvation and Binding Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Seonghoon Kim; Hiraku Oshima; Han Zhang; Nathan R Kern; Suyong Re; Jumin Lee; Benoît Roux; Yuji Sugita; Wei Jiang; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.