Literature DB >> 31185169

Robust Free Energy Perturbation Protocols for Creating Molecules in Solution.

Israel Cabeza de Vaca1, Ricardo Zarzuela2, Julian Tirado-Rives1, William L Jorgensen1.   

Abstract

Accurate methods to estimate free energies play an important role for studying diverse condensed-phase problems in chemistry and biochemistry. The most common methods used in conjunction with molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo statistical mechanics (MC) simulations are free energy perturbation (FEP) and thermodynamic integration (TI). For common applications featuring the conversion of one molecule to another, simulations are run in stages or multiple "λ-windows" to promote convergence of the results. For computation of absolute free energies of solvation or binding, calculations are needed in which the solute is typically annihilated in the solvent and in the complex. The present work addresses identification of optimal protocols for such calculations, specifically, the creation/annihilation of organic molecules in aqueous solution. As is common practice, decoupling of the perturbations for electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions was performed. Consistent with earlier reports, FEP calculations for molecular creations are much more efficient, while annihilations require many more windows and may converge to incorrect values. Strikingly, we find that as few as four windows may be adequate for creation calculations for solutes ranging from argon to ethylbenzene. For a larger druglike molecule, MIF180, which contains 22 non-hydrogen atoms and three rotatable bonds, 10 creation windows are found to be adequate to yield the correct free energy of hydration. Convergence is impeded with procedures that use any sampling in the annihilation direction, and there is no need for postprocessing methods such as the Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31185169      PMCID: PMC6615964          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  24 in total

1.  Improving the efficiency and reliability of free energy perturbation calculations using overlap sampling methods.

Authors:  Nandou Lu; David A Kofke; Thomas B Woolf
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Excess free energy of liquids from molecular dynamics simulations. Application to water models.

Authors:  J Hermans; A Pathiaseril; A Anderson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Direct calculation of the binding free energies of FKBP ligands.

Authors:  Hideaki Fujitani; Yoshiaki Tanida; Masakatsu Ito; Guha Jayachandran; Christopher D Snow; Michael R Shirts; Eric J Sorin; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy using distributed replica sampling.

Authors:  Tomas Rodinger; P Lynne Howell; Régis Pomès
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Perspective on Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations for Chemical Equilibria.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Laura L Thomas
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Free Energy Perturbation Hamiltonian Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  4 in total

1.  Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yue Qian; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Jonah Z Vilseck; Daniel J Cole; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction.

Authors:  Maria M Reif; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Free energy of hydrophilic and hydrophobic pores in lipid bilayers by free energy perturbation of a restraint.

Authors:  Mayank Dixit; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Screening of world approved drugs against highly dynamical spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 using CaverDock and machine learning.

Authors:  Gaspar P Pinto; Ondrej Vavra; Sergio M Marques; Jiri Filipovic; David Bednar; Jiri Damborsky
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 7.271

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.