Literature DB >> 27930764

Decision-Making Quality in Parents Considering Adenotonsillectomy or Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for Their Children.

Paul Hong1, Erin Maguire2, Mary Purcell2, Krista C Ritchie3, Jill Chorney4.   

Abstract

Importance: Shared decision making is a process in which clinicians and patients make health care decisions in a collaborative manner using the most up-to-date evidence, while considering patient values and preferences. Shared decision making is thought to have a positive influence on the decision-making process in medicine. Objective: To describe the level of decisional conflict and decisional regret experienced by parents considering surgery for their children and to determine relations among decisional conflict, decisional regret, and shared decision making. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted at an academic pediatric otolaryngology clinic. Participants included 126 parents of children younger than 6 years who underwent consultation for adenotonsillectomy or tympanostomy tube insertion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Parent participants completed the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Parent version, Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Surgeons completed the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician version.
Results: This study included 126 parents; 102 women (mean [SD] age, 33.2 [5.1] years) and 24 men (mean [SD] age, 35.6 [6.3] years). Overall, 34 parents (26%) reported clinically significant decisional conflict. Only 1 parent experienced moderate to strong decisional regret; 28 parents (43.7%) had mild decisional regret. Both parent and physician ratings of shared decision making were significantly negatively correlated with total DCS scores. Parent SDM-Q-9 and total DCS scores were significantly negatively correlated (rs[118] = -0.582; P < .001). Similarly, physician SDM-Q-Doc and total DCS scores were also significantly negatively correlated (rs[118] = -0.221; P = .04). Only parent ratings of shared decision making were significantly negatively correlated with total DRS scores (rs[63] = -0.254; P = .045). Those parents with clinically significant decisional conflict had significantly higher DRS scores (P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Many parents experienced significant decisional conflict when making decisions about their child's elective surgical treatment. Parents who perceived themselves as being more involved in the decision-making process reported less decisional conflict and decisional regret. Future research should explore the influence of decision quality on health outcomes and develop methods to improve shared decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27930764     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  8 in total

1.  Characterizing Decisional Conflict for Caregivers of Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Without Tonsillar Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Amy M Manning; Angela L Duggins; Karin A Tiemeyer; Lisa A Mullen; Joseph A Crisalli; Aliza P Cohen; Stacey L Ishman
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.

Authors:  Vandra C Harris; Anne R Links; Paul Hong; Jonathan Walsh; Desi P Schoo; David E Tunkel; Charles M Stewart; Emily F Boss
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Tympanostomy tubes for children with acute otitis media.

Authors:  Justin L Griffiths; Ran D Goldman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.025

4.  Evaluation of Parental Perspectives and Concerns About Pediatric Tonsillectomy in Social Media.

Authors:  Tai Kyung Hairston; Anne R Links; Vandra Harris; David E Tunkel; Jonathan Walsh; Mary Catherine Beach; Emily F Boss
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Relationship Between Parental Intolerance of Uncertainty and Decisional Conflict in Pediatric Otolaryngologic Surgery.

Authors:  Chelsea Cleveland; Vijay A Patel; Shari A Steinman; Reena Razdan; Michele M Carr
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 5.591

6.  Portuguese validation of the Regret Intensity Scale (RIS-10) for measuring the intensity of regret associated with the provision of attention in health.

Authors:  Fabiana Rosa Neves Smiderle; Valmin Ramos-Silva; Stela Maris de Jezus Castro; Delphine Sophie Courvoisier; Rita Mattiello
Journal:  Invest Educ Enferm       Date:  2021-10

7.  The relationship between evaluation of shared decision-making by pet owners and veterinarians and satisfaction with veterinary consultations.

Authors:  Yuma Ito; Hirono Ishikawa; Asuka Suzuki; Mio Kato
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Decision-Making in Cleft-Related Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patients and Caregivers.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Annie K Patterson; Kylie Schafer; Madeleine Haase; Kavitha Ranganathan; Noelle Carlozzi; Christian J Vercler; Steven J Kasten; Steven R Buchman; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.