Vandra C Harris1, Anne R Links1, Paul Hong2, Jonathan Walsh1, Desi P Schoo1, David E Tunkel1, Charles M Stewart1, Emily F Boss1,3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. 2. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Tympanostomy tube (TT) placement is common in children; however, family-centeredness and utility of online information used for decision making and understanding is unknown. We evaluate the quality of leading Internet resources describing TT placement. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive design. METHODS: We performed a Google (Menlo Park, CA) search for terms related to TTs. We defined quality using scaled readability measures (Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade-Level), understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool), shared decision-making centrality (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services informed consent guidelines), and clinical practice guideline (CPG) compatibility. Three reviewers coded each measure. Fleiss κ interrater reliability analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ten most frequently encountered websites were analyzed. One of 10 met national health literacy standards (mean 10th-grade level reading, median 9th, range 6-15th). All sites were understandable (mean understandability 81.9%, range 73%-92%). Most had low actionability scores (7 of 10, median 47%, mean 44.6%, range 0-80). Shared decision-making centrality was high (mean 5, range 4-6), but most did not list alternative treatment options. Although CPG compatibility was high (mean 3.4, range 1-4), many websites contained inconsistent recommendations about tube duration, follow-up, and water precautions. There was inter-rater agreement for understandability scoring (κ = 0.20; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Internet resources about TT placement vary in quality pertaining to health literacy, principles of shared decision making, and consistency with practice guidelines. With growing emphasis on patient-/family-centered engagement in healthcare decision making, standardization of content and improved usability of educational materials for common surgical procedures in children such as tympanostomy tube placement should be a public health priority. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 128:496-501, 2018.
OBJECTIVE: Tympanostomy tube (TT) placement is common in children; however, family-centeredness and utility of online information used for decision making and understanding is unknown. We evaluate the quality of leading Internet resources describing TT placement. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive design. METHODS: We performed a Google (Menlo Park, CA) search for terms related to TTs. We defined quality using scaled readability measures (Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade-Level), understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool), shared decision-making centrality (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services informed consent guidelines), and clinical practice guideline (CPG) compatibility. Three reviewers coded each measure. Fleiss κ interrater reliability analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ten most frequently encountered websites were analyzed. One of 10 met national health literacy standards (mean 10th-grade level reading, median 9th, range 6-15th). All sites were understandable (mean understandability 81.9%, range 73%-92%). Most had low actionability scores (7 of 10, median 47%, mean 44.6%, range 0-80). Shared decision-making centrality was high (mean 5, range 4-6), but most did not list alternative treatment options. Although CPG compatibility was high (mean 3.4, range 1-4), many websites contained inconsistent recommendations about tube duration, follow-up, and water precautions. There was inter-rater agreement for understandability scoring (κ = 0.20; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Internet resources about TT placement vary in quality pertaining to health literacy, principles of shared decision making, and consistency with practice guidelines. With growing emphasis on patient-/family-centered engagement in healthcare decision making, standardization of content and improved usability of educational materials for common surgical procedures in children such as tympanostomy tube placement should be a public health priority. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Laryngoscope, 128:496-501, 2018.
Authors: Richard M Rosenfeld; Seth R Schwartz; Melissa A Pynnonen; David E Tunkel; Heather M Hussey; Jeffrey S Fichera; Alison M Grimes; Jesse M Hackell; Melody F Harrison; Helen Haskell; David S Haynes; Tae W Kim; Denis C Lafreniere; Katie LeBlanc; Wendy L Mackey; James L Netterville; Mary E Pipan; Nikhila P Raol; Kenneth G Schellhase Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Nitin Agarwal; Sumana S Kommana; David R Hansberry; Ahmed I Kashkoush; Robert M Friedlander; L Dade Lunsford Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Amr Salama; Janet Panoch; Elhaam Bandali; Aaron Carroll; Sarah Wiehe; Stephen Downs; Mark P Cain; Richard Frankel; Katherine H Chan Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 1.830
Authors: Burke Gao; Alan G Shamrock; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Olivia C O'Reilly; Kyle R Duchman; Robert W Westermann; Brian R Wolf Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-07-28
Authors: Trevor Robert Gulbrandsen; Mary Kate Skalitzky; Alan Gregory Shamrock; Burke Gao; Obada Hasan; Benjamin James Miller Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-03-24