Literature DB >> 27928395

Evaluation of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect Using RAPDx Device in Patients with Optic Nerve Disease.

Tsukasa Satou1, Hitoshi Ishikawa2, Ken Asakawa3, Toshiaki Goseki1, Takahiro Niida4, Kimiya Shimizu1.   

Abstract

We previously reported the standard values of the amplitude and latency scores in the RAPDx device for evaluating relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Here, we evaluated RAPD in patients with optic nerve disease by using these standard values. Twenty-eight patients with current or previous optic nerve disease were enrolled in this study. Additionally, the data of 84 healthy subjects from our previous report were used as control data. We measured the amplitude and latency scores using RAPDx. We then compared their mean values and the percentages of individuals with standard values within a certain range between the optic nerve disease group and healthy group. Additionally, we evaluated their correlation with visual acuity and the critical flicker fusion frequency in the optic nerve disease group. Both parameters were significantly higher in the optic nerve disease group than in the control group (p < 0.0001). The detection rate of RAPD when using the standard value of amplitude score was 75%. Additionally, both parameters showed a significant correlation with laterality-based differences in visual acuity and critical flicker fusion frequency values in the optic nerve disease group (r = 0.59-0.75, p < 0.001). The amplitude and latency scores determined using RAPDx are useful in evaluating RAPD, particularly the standard value of the amplitude score.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection rate; optic nerve disease; relative afferent pupillary defect; standard values

Year:  2016        PMID: 27928395      PMCID: PMC5123143          DOI: 10.3109/01658107.2016.1169550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  16 in total

1.  Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve.

Authors:  P LEVATIN
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1959-11

2.  Long-term fluctuation of relative afferent pupillary defect in subjects with normal visual function.

Authors:  A Kawasaki; P Moore; R H Kardon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Development and validation of an associative model for the detection of glaucoma using pupillography.

Authors:  Dolly S Chang; Karun S Arora; Michael V Boland; Wasu Supakontanasan; David S Friedman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect.

Authors:  A Kawasaki; P Moore; R H Kardon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss.

Authors:  H S Thompson; P Montague; T A Cox; J J Corbett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect.

Authors:  H S Thompson; J J Corbett; T A Cox
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Detection of asymmetric glaucomatous damage using automated pupillography, the swinging flashlight method and the magnified-assisted swinging flashlight method.

Authors:  M Waisbourd; B Lee; M H Ali; L Lu; P Martinez; B Faria; A Williams; M R Moster; L J Katz; G L Spaeth
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].

Authors:  H Wilhelm; S Meilinger; E Apfelstedt
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Relative afferent pupillary defects in optic neuritis.

Authors:  T A Cox; H S Thompson; J J Corbett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Association between a relative afferent pupillary defect using pupillography and inner retinal atrophy in optic nerve disease.

Authors:  Go Takizawa; Atsushi Miki; Fumiatsu Maeda; Katsutoshi Goto; Syunsuke Araki; Yoshiaki Ieki; Junichi Kiryu; Kiyoshi Yaoeda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect using the RAPDx® Device Before and After Treatment in Patients with Optic Nerve Disease.

Authors:  Tsukasa Satou; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Toshiaki Goseki; Ken Asakawa
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-09-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.