Literature DB >> 16594792

Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey.

Geoff Der1, Ian J Deary.   

Abstract

Reaction times (RTs) slow and become more variable with age. Research samples are typically small, biased, and of restricted age range. Consequently, little is known about the precise pattern of change, whereas evidence for sex differences is equivocal. The authors reanalyzed data for 7,130 adult participants in the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey, originally reported by F. A. Huppert (1987). The authors modeled the age differences in simple and 4-choice reaction time means and variabilities and tested for sex differences. Simple RT shows little slowing until around 50, whereas choice RT slows throughout the adult age range. The aging of choice RT variability is a function of its mean and the error rate. There are significant sex differences, most notably for choice RT variability. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16594792     DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  127 in total

1.  Ageing of internal models: from a continuous to an intermittent proprioceptive control of movement.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-05-26

2.  Audio-visual object search is changed by bilingual experience.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Scott R Schroeder; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Clinical Reaction-Time Performance Factors in Healthy Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Caccese; James T Eckner; Lea Franco-MacKendrick; Joseph B Hazzard; Meng Ni; Steven P Broglio; Thomas W McAllister; Michael McCrea; Thomas A Buckley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Delayed grip relaxation and altered modulation of intracortical inhibition with aging.

Authors:  Binal Motawar; James W Stinear; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Mental chronometry and individual differences: modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

7.  Variation of reaction time in different phases of menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Mehak Mufti; Ravikiran Kisan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-07-27

8.  Increased vulnerability to attentional failure during acute sleep deprivation in women depends on menstrual phase.

Authors:  Parisa Vidafar; Joshua J Gooley; Angus C Burns; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Melanie Rueger; Eliza Van Reen; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley; Sean W Cain
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Wiltrud Fassbinder; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Teal S Eich; Yaakov Stern; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.