Literature DB >> 17120397

Limitations of estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine in the general population.

Andrew D Rule1, Richard J Rodeheffer, Timothy S Larson, John C Burnett, Fernando G Cosio, Stephen T Turner, Steven J Jacobsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the general population on the basis of equations derived from different subsets of the general population. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Adults (ages _45 years) were randomly selected from 1997 to 2000 from the Olmsted County, Minnesota, population and had their serum creatinine levels measured. The GFR was estimated using previously reported equations derived from a sample of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a sample of healthy persons, and the combined samples. Serum creatinine was measured with the same assay used to derive these equations.
RESULTS: Of 4203 subjects, 2042 (47% participation rate) were enrolled and studied. Serum samples from 1982 subjects were used to measure creatinine levels. The prevalence of a reduced estimated GFR (<60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-13%) based on an equation derived with all CKD patients, and this finding was similar to prior reports. However, the prevalence of a reduced estimated GFR was 5.7% (95% CI, 4.8%-6.8%) based on an equation derived with both CKD patients and healthy persons and 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.5%) based on an equation derived with all healthy persons. Women had a higher risk of reduced estimated GFR according to an equation derived with all CKD patients, but men had a higher risk with an equation derived with both CKD patients and healthy persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17120397     DOI: 10.4065/81.11.1427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  24 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic differences in albuminuria in individuals with estimated GFR greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2): results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP).

Authors:  Stacey E Jolly; Nilka Ríos Burrows; Shu-Cheng Chen; Suying Li; Claudine T Jurkovitz; Andrew S Narva; Keith C Norris; Michael G Shlipak
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Cystatin C-based CKD-EPI equations and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for predicting outcomes in acutely decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Pedro J Flores-Blanco; Sergio Manzano-Fernández; Juan I Pérez-Calvo; Francisco J Pastor-Pérez; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruiz; Francisco J Carrasco-Sánchez; José L Morales-Rull; Domingo Pascual-Figal; Luis Galisteo-Almeda; James L Januzzi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Do we need another equation to estimate GFR from serum creatinine in renal allograft recipients?

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Timothy S Larson
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  GFR estimating equations: getting closer to the truth?

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Richard J Glassock
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Performance of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in a community-based sample of Blacks and Whites: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey; Hocine Tighiouart; Tariq Shafi; John H Eckfeldt; Craig Johnson; Aghogho Okparavero; Wendy S Post; Josef Coresh; Michael G Shlipak
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Relative performance of the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate among patients with varied clinical presentations.

Authors:  Kazunori Murata; Nikola A Baumann; Amy K Saenger; Timothy S Larson; Andrew D Rule; John C Lieske
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Estimated GFR Before and After Bariatric Surgery in CKD.

Authors:  Talha H Imam; Heidi Fischer; Bocheng Jing; Raoul Burchette; Shayna Henry; Stephen F DeRose; Karen J Coleman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  Time to differentiate 'decreased kidney function' from 'kidney disease': towards improving the definition of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Malvinder S Parmar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Use of renal function measurements for assessing fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  James T McCarthy; Andrew D Rule; Sara J Achenbach; Eric J Bergstralh; Sundeep Khosla; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Hypertension during pregnancy is associated with coronary artery calcium independent of renal function.

Authors:  Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Lawrence F Bielak; Andrew D Rule; Patrick F Sheedy; Stephen T Turner; Vesna D Garovic; Patricia A Peyser
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.