Literature DB >> 27924506

Gasless laparoscopic surgery plus abdominal wall lifting for giant hiatal hernia-our single-center experience.

Jiang-Hong Yu1, Ji-Xiang Wu2, Lei Yu3, Jian-Ye Li3.   

Abstract

Giant hiatal hernia (GHH) comprises 5% of hiatal hernia and is associated with significant complications. The traditional operative procedure, no matter transthoracic or transabdomen repair of giant hiatal hernia, is characteristic of more invasion and more complications. Although laparoscopic repair as a minimally invasive surgery is accepted, a part of patients can not tolerate pneumoperitoneum because of combination with cardiopulmonary diseases or severe posterior mediastinal and neck emphesema during operation. The aim of this article was to analyze our experience in gasless laparoscopic repair with abdominal wall lifting to treat the giant hiatal hernia. We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting from 2012 to 2015 at our institution. The GHH was defined as greater than one-third of the stomach in the chest. Gasless laparoscopic repair of GHH with abdominal wall lifting was attempted in 27 patients. Mean age was 67 years. The results showed that there were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative deaths. The mean duration of operation was 100 min (range: 90-130 min). One-side pleura was injured in 4 cases (14.8%). The mean postoperative length of stay was 4 days (range: 3-7 days). Median follow- up was 26 months (range: 6-38 months). Transient dysphagia for solid food occurred in three patients (11.1%), and this symptom disappeared within three months. There was one patient with recurrent hiatal hernia who was reoperated on. Two patients still complained of heartburn three months after surgery. Neither reoperation nor endoscopic treatment due to signs of postoperative esophageal stenosis was required in any patient. Totally, satisfactory outcome was reported in 88.9% patients. It was concluded that the gasless laparoscopic approach with abdominal wall lifting to the repair of GHH is feasible, safe, and effective for the patients who cannot tolerate the pneumoperitoneum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nissen fundoplication; abdominal wall lifting; gasless laparoscopy; giant hiatal hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27924506     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1685-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  29 in total

1.  Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation.

Authors:  Michael Parker; Steven P Bowers; Jillian M Bray; Adam S Harris; Erol V Belli; Jason M Pfluke; Susanne Preissler; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Visick score: a good measure for the overall effect of antireflux surgery?

Authors:  Hilda G Rijnhart-De Jong; Werner A Draaisma; André J P M Smout; Ivo A M J Broeders; Hein G Gooszen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Hemodynamic, respiratory, and metabolic effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R L Goodale; D S Beebe; M P McNevin; M Boyle; J G Letourneau; J H Abrams; F B Cerra
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Carlos A Pellegrini; John Hunter; Nathaniel Soper; Michael Brunt; Brett Sheppard; Blair Jobe; Nayak Polissar; Lee Mitsumori; James Nelson; L Swanstrom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management.

Authors:  D E Maziak; T R Todd; F G Pearson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Cardiovascular and respiratory changes and convalescence in laparoscopic colonic surgery: comparison between carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and gasless laparoscopy.

Authors:  S Schulze; K M Lyng; K Bugge; A Perner; A Bendtsen; J Thorup; H J Nielsen; V Rasmussen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-10

7.  A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; George P Stavropoulos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-06

8.  Effect of paraesophageal hernia on sphincter function and its implication on surgical therapy.

Authors:  B Walther; T R DeMeester; E Lafontaine; J V Courtney; A G Little; D B Skinner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series.

Authors:  Rudolf J Stadlhuber; Amr El Sherif; Sumeet K Mittal; Robert J Fitzgibbons; L Michael Brunt; John G Hunter; Tom R Demeester; Lee L Swanstrom; C Daniel Smith; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Tailored or routine addition of an antireflux fundoplication in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Edgar J B Furnée; Werner A Draaisma; Hein G Gooszen; Eric J Hazebroek; Andre J P M Smout; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of a new device for gasless endosurgery in a laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair ex vivo canine model: A pre-clinical study.

Authors:  Maurício V Brun; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marco A Machado-Silva; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.