Fuyuen Yip1, Bryan Christensen2, Kanta Sircar2, Luke Naeher3, Nigel Bruce4, David Pennise5, Matthew Lozier2, Tamara Pilishvili6, Jennifer Loo Farrar6, Debbi Stanistreet4, Ronald Nyagol7, Justus Muoki5, Lindsey de Beer2, Michael Sage2, Vikas Kapil8. 1. National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: fyip@cdc.gov. 2. National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. 3. Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States. 4. Department of Public Health and Policy, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 5. Berkeley Air Monitoring Group, Berkeley, CA, United States. 6. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. 7. Nyando Integrated Child Health and Education Project/Safe Water and AIDS Project, Kisumu, Kenya. 8. Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over 40% of the world's population relies on solid fuels for heating and cooking. Use of improved biomass cookstoves (ICS) has the potential to reduce household air pollution (HAP). OBJECTIVES: As part of an evaluation to identify ICS for use in Kenya, we collected indoor air and personal air samples to assess differences between traditional cookstoves (TCS) and ICS. METHODS: We conducted a cross-over study in 2012 in two Kenyan villages; up to six different ICS were installed in 45 households during six two-week periods. Forty-eight hour kitchen measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) were collected for the TCS and ICS. Concurrent personal CO measurements were conducted on the mother and one child in each household. We performed descriptive analysis and compared paired measurements between baseline (TCS only) and each ICS. RESULTS: The geometric mean of 48-hour baseline PM2.5 and CO concentrations in the kitchen was 586μg/m3 (95% CI: 460, 747) and 4.9ppm (95% CI: 4.3, 5.5), respectively. For each ICS, the geometric mean kitchen air pollutant concentration was lower than the TCS: median reductions were 38.8% (95% CI: 29.5, 45.2) for PM2.5 and 27.1% (95% CI: 17.4, 40.3) for CO, with statistically significant relationships for four ICS. We also observed a reduction in personal exposures to CO with ICS use. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a reduction in mean 48-hour PM2.5 and CO concentrations compared to the TCS; however, concentrations for both pollutants were still consistently higher than WHO air quality guidelines. Our findings illustrate that ICS tested in real-world settings can reduce exposures to HAP, but implementation of cleaner fuels and related stove technologies may also be necessary to optimize public health benefits. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Over 40% of the world's population relies on solid fuels for heating and cooking. Use of improved biomass cookstoves (ICS) has the potential to reduce household air pollution (HAP). OBJECTIVES: As part of an evaluation to identify ICS for use in Kenya, we collected indoor air and personal air samples to assess differences between traditional cookstoves (TCS) and ICS. METHODS: We conducted a cross-over study in 2012 in two Kenyan villages; up to six different ICS were installed in 45 households during six two-week periods. Forty-eight hour kitchen measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) were collected for the TCS and ICS. Concurrent personal CO measurements were conducted on the mother and one child in each household. We performed descriptive analysis and compared paired measurements between baseline (TCS only) and each ICS. RESULTS: The geometric mean of 48-hour baseline PM2.5 and CO concentrations in the kitchen was 586μg/m3 (95% CI: 460, 747) and 4.9ppm (95% CI: 4.3, 5.5), respectively. For each ICS, the geometric mean kitchen air pollutant concentration was lower than the TCS: median reductions were 38.8% (95% CI: 29.5, 45.2) for PM2.5 and 27.1% (95% CI: 17.4, 40.3) for CO, with statistically significant relationships for four ICS. We also observed a reduction in personal exposures to CO with ICS use. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a reduction in mean 48-hour PM2.5 and CO concentrations compared to the TCS; however, concentrations for both pollutants were still consistently higher than WHO air quality guidelines. Our findings illustrate that ICS tested in real-world settings can reduce exposures to HAP, but implementation of cleaner fuels and related stove technologies may also be necessary to optimize public health benefits. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carbon monoxide; Cookstove; Household air pollution; Particulate matter
Authors: Debbi Stanistreet; Lirije Hyseni; Michelle Bashin; Ibrahim Sadumah; Daniel Pope; Michael Sage; Nigel Bruce Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015
Authors: James Jetter; Yongxin Zhao; Kirk R Smith; Bernine Khan; Tiffany Yelverton; Peter Decarlo; Michael D Hays Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Stephen S Lim; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Goodarz Danaei; Kenji Shibuya; Heather Adair-Rohani; Markus Amann; H Ross Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Martin Aryee; Charles Atkinson; Loraine J Bacchus; Adil N Bahalim; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Carissa Bonner; Guilherme Borges; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Michael Brauer; Peter Brooks; Nigel G Bruce; Bert Brunekreef; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Fiona Bull; Richard T Burnett; Tim E Byers; Bianca Calabria; Jonathan Carapetis; Emily Carnahan; Zoe Chafe; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Jian Shen Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; Jennifer Christine Child; Aaron Cohen; K Ellicott Colson; Benjamin C Cowie; Sarah Darby; Susan Darling; Adrian Davis; Louisa Degenhardt; Frank Dentener; Don C Des Jarlais; Karen Devries; Mukesh Dherani; Eric L Ding; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Karen Edmond; Suad Eltahir Ali; Rebecca E Engell; Patricia J Erwin; Saman Fahimi; Gail Falder; Farshad Farzadfar; Alize Ferrari; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Greg Freedman; Michael K Freeman; Emmanuela Gakidou; Santu Ghosh; Edward Giovannucci; Gerhard Gmel; Kathryn Graham; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; David Gunnell; Hialy R Gutierrez; Wayne Hall; Hans W Hoek; Anthony Hogan; H Dean Hosgood; Damian Hoy; Howard Hu; Bryan J Hubbell; Sally J Hutchings; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Gemma L Jacklyn; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Jost B Jonas; Haidong Kan; John A Kanis; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Young-Ho Khang; Shahab Khatibzadeh; Jon-Paul Khoo; Cindy Kok; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Qing Lan; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; James Leigh; Yang Li; John Kent Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Stephanie London; Rafael Lozano; Yuan Lu; Joelle Mak; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; Robin Marks; Randall Martin; Paul McGale; John McGrath; Sumi Mehta; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Renata Micha; Catherine Michaud; Vinod Mishra; Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah; Ali A Mokdad; Lidia Morawska; Dariush Mozaffarian; Tasha Murphy; Mohsen Naghavi; Bruce Neal; Paul K Nelson; Joan Miquel Nolla; Rosana Norman; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Jessica Orchard; Richard Osborne; Bart Ostro; Andrew Page; Kiran D Pandey; Charles D H Parry; Erin Passmore; Jayadeep Patra; Neil Pearce; Pamela M Pelizzari; Max Petzold; Michael R Phillips; Dan Pope; C Arden Pope; John Powles; Mayuree Rao; Homie Razavi; Eva A Rehfuess; Jürgen T Rehm; Beate Ritz; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Jose A Rodriguez-Portales; Isabelle Romieu; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Ananya Roy; Lesley Rushton; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; Amir Sapkota; Soraya Seedat; Peilin Shi; Kevin Shield; Rupak Shivakoti; Gitanjali M Singh; David A Sleet; Emma Smith; Kirk R Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Kyle Steenland; Heidi Stöckl; Lars Jacob Stovner; Kurt Straif; Lahn Straney; George D Thurston; Jimmy H Tran; Rita Van Dingenen; Aaron van Donkelaar; J Lennert Veerman; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Robert Weintraub; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Warwick Williams; Nicholas Wilson; Anthony D Woolf; Paul Yip; Jan M Zielinski; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kirk R Smith; John P McCracken; Martin W Weber; Alan Hubbard; Alisa Jenny; Lisa M Thompson; John Balmes; Anaité Diaz; Byron Arana; Nigel Bruce Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kristen D Ojo; Sutyajeet I Soneja; Carolyn G Scrafford; Subarna K Khatry; Steven C LeClerq; William Checkley; Joanne Katz; Patrick N Breysse; James M Tielsch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tamara Pilishvili; Jennifer D Loo; Stephanie Schrag; Debbi Stanistreet; Bryan Christensen; Fuyuen Yip; Ronald Nyagol; Robert Quick; Mike Sage; Nigel Bruce Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jennifer D Loo; Lirije Hyseni; Rosebel Ouda; Selline Koske; Ronald Nyagol; Ibrahim Sadumah; Michelle Bashin; Mike Sage; Nigel Bruce; Tamara Pilishvili; Debbi Stanistreet Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Binaya Kc; Parth Sarathi Mahapatra; Dhruma Thakker; Amanda P Henry; Charlotte K Billington; Ian Sayers; Siva Praveen Puppala; Ian P Hall Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-06
Authors: Kyle Steenland; Ajay Pillarisetti; Miles Kirby; Jennifer Peel; Maggie Clark; Will Checkley; Howard H Chang; Thomas Clasen Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-11-26 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Eugene A Gibbs-Flournoy; M Ian Gilmour; Mark Higuchi; James Jetter; Ingrid George; Lisa Copeland; Randy Harrison; Virginia C Moser; Janice A Dye Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Josiah L Kephart; Magdalena Fandiño-Del-Rio; Kendra N Williams; Gary Malpartida; Alexander Lee; Kyle Steenland; Luke P Naeher; Gustavo F Gonzales; Marilu Chiang; William Checkley; Kirsten Koehler Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Megan L Benka-Coker; Bonnie N Young; Joshua P Keller; Ethan S Walker; Sarah Rajkumar; John Volckens; Nicholas Good; Casey Quinn; Christian L'Orange; Zachary D Weller; Sebastian Africano; Anibal B Osorto Pinel; Jennifer L Peel; Maggie L Clark Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Mulugeta Tamire; Abera Kumie; Adamu Addissie; Mulugeta Ayalew; Johan Boman; Susann Skovbjerg; Rune Andersson; Mona Lärstad Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ashlinn K Quinn; Irene Apewe Adjei; Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise; Oscar Agyei; Ellen Abrafi Boamah-Kaali; Katrin Burkart; Daniel Carrión; Steven N Chillrud; Carlos F Gould; Stephaney Gyaase; Darby W Jack; Seyram Kaali; Patrick L Kinney; Alison G Lee; Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba; Felix Boakye Oppong; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Abena Yawson; Blair J Wylie; Kwaku Poku Asante Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-06-13 Impact factor: 13.352