Literature DB >> 27922540

Prognostic value of quantitative PET/CT in patients with a nonsmall cell lung cancer and another primary cancer.

Xuee Zhu1, Chuanhong Liao, Bill C Penney, Feng Li, Mark K Ferguson, Cassie A Simon, Tianming Wu, Haiyan Liu, Yonglin Pu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The staging and management of patients with newly diagnosed nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the setting of recently diagnosed other (metachronous or synchronous) primary cancer are challenging. This retrospective cohort study was carried out to test our hypothesis that baseline 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose (F-FDG) PET/CT parameters, including whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB), total lesion glycolysis (TLGWB), and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmaxWB), are associated with the overall survival (OS) of such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 110 NSCLC patients (52 men and 58 women, aged 68.6±7.8 years) with other primary malignant cancers who had baseline F-FDG PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. MTVWB, TLGWB, and SUVmaxWB were measured. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test and Cox regression models were used to assess the association of OS with F-FDG PET/CT parameters and clinical risk factors.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression models showed significant associations of OS with ln(MTVWB), ln(TLGWB), ln(SUVmaxWB), TNM stage, and treatment type (surgery vs. no treatment). Multivariable Cox regression models showed a significant relationship of OS with ln(MTVWB) [hazard ratio (HR)=1.368, P=0.001], ln(TLGWB) (HR=1.313, P<0.001), and ln(SUVmaxWB) (HR=1.739, P=0.006), adjusted for age, treatment type, tumor histology, and TNM stage. The TNM stage was not associated significantly with OS when MTVWB, TLGWB, or SUVmaxWB were included in the multivariable models.
CONCLUSION: MTVWB, TLGWB, and SUVmaxWB from baseline F-FDG PET/CT are associated individually with OS of patients with both NSCLC and other primary malignant tumors independent of age, treatment type, tumor histology, and TNM stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27922540      PMCID: PMC5239728          DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  26 in total

1.  Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Kristen Wroblewski; Daniel Appelbaum; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ryool Oh; Ji-Hyoung Seo; Ari Chong; Jung-Joon Min; Ho-Chun Song; Young-Chul Kim; Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kyoungjune Pak; Gi Jeong Cheon; Hyun-Yeol Nam; Seong-Jang Kim; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; E Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shengri Liao; Bill C Penney; Kristen Wroblewski; Hao Zhang; Cassie A Simon; Rony Kampalath; Ming-Chi Shih; Naoko Shimada; Sheng Chen; Ravi Salgia; Daniel E Appelbaum; Kenji Suzuki; Chin-Tu Chen; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Late recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer more than 5 years after complete resection: incidence and clinical implications in patient follow-up.

Authors:  Ryo Maeda; Junji Yoshida; Tomoyuki Hishida; Keiju Aokage; Mitsuyo Nishimura; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Kanji Nagai
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Percy Lee; Jose G Bazan; Philip W Lavori; Dilani K Weerasuriya; Andrew Quon; Quynh-Thu Le; Heather A Wakelee; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer.

Authors:  W Wang; S M Larson; M Fazzari; S K Tickoo; K Kolbert; G Sgouros; H Yeung; H Macapinlac; J Rosai; R J Robbins
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Volume, as Determined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as a Prognostic Factor of Outcome for Patients With Breast Cancer Who Have Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Son; Sang-Woo Lee; Shin Young Jeong; Bong-Il Song; Yee Soo Chae; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Jaetae Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

Authors:  Peter Goldstraw; John Crowley; Kari Chansky; Dorothy J Giroux; Patti A Groome; Ramon Rami-Porta; Pieter E Postmus; Valerie Rusch; Leslie Sobin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Prognostic value of metabolic parameters in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis following curative-intent colorectal and hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Hyo Sang Lee; Hye Ok Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Tae Won Kim; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Jae Seung Kim
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  3 in total

1.  Developing and validating a novel metabolic tumor volume risk stratification system for supplementing non-small cell lung cancer staging.

Authors:  Yonglin Pu; James X Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Daniel Appelbaum; Jianfeng Meng; Bill C Penney
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  How much primary tumor metabolic volume reduction is required to improve outcome in stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy? A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Olarn Roengvoraphoj; Chukwuka Eze; Cherylina Wijaya; Maurice Dantes; Julian Taugner; Amanda Tufman; Rudolf Maria Huber; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Farkhad Manapov
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Whole body metabolic tumor volume is a prognostic marker in patients with newly diagnosed stage 3B non-small cell lung cancer, confirmed with external validation.

Authors:  Brittany Z Dashevsky; Li Yan; Chenpeng Zhang; Cindy Yuan; Lingyun Xiong; Yongmei Liu; Haiyan Liu; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2017-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.