Literature DB >> 24549284

Prognostic value of metabolic parameters in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis following curative-intent colorectal and hepatic surgery.

Hyo Sang Lee1, Hye Ok Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Jin Cheon Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Jae Seung Kim.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (SCLM) remains a clinical challenge, largely because of the limited availability of tools that use reliable prognostic indicators to guide treatment. This study assessed the prognostic ability of preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SCLM who had undergone curative-intent colorectal and liver surgery.
METHODS: All included patients had undergone simultaneous colorectal and hepatic surgery to treat SCLM. Cox regression for survival analysis was undertaken using clinicopathologic variables and metabolic parameters (metabolic tumor volume [MTV], total lesion glycolysis [TLG], and peak standardized uptake value [SUVpeak]) as covariates, with tumor recurrence and death used as endpoints.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients (82 men, 38 women; mean age ± SD, 59.9 ± 10.1 y) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Univariate analysis showed that MTV, TLG, and the size of hepatic metastases were significant indicators of both recurrence-free survival and overall survival, whereas those of primary colorectal tumors were not. Multivariate analysis revealed that the SUVpeak of primary tumors and hepatic metastases remained significant after adjusting for other clinicopathologic variables, whereas the MTV and TLG of hepatic metastases became insignificant after adjusting for differences in tumor size. The combination of a high SUVpeak of hepatic metastases and a low SUVpeak of primary tumors was related to poor prognosis under the multivariate model.
CONCLUSION: In patients with SCLM who underwent curative-intent colorectal and liver surgery, metabolic parameters of hepatic metastases possess prognostic significance whereas those of primary colorectal tumors do not. For hepatic metastases, the SUVpeak is an independent prognostic factor, whereas MTV and TLG are surrogate measures of tumor size. Reduced recurrence-free survival rates are associated with higher SUVpeak for hepatic metastases and lower SUVpeak for primary tumors. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; prognosis; prognostic model; prognostic score; synchronous colorectal liver metastasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24549284     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.128629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  8 in total

1.  FDG-PET reflects tumor viability on SUV in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Authors:  Akira Watanabe; Norifumi Harimoto; Takehiko Yokobori; Kenichiro Araki; Norio Kubo; Takamichi Igarashi; Mariko Tsukagoshi; Norihiro Ishii; Takahiro Yamanaka; Tadashi Handa; Tetsunari Oyama; Tetsuya Higuchi; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prognostic value of quantitative PET/CT in patients with a nonsmall cell lung cancer and another primary cancer.

Authors:  Xuee Zhu; Chuanhong Liao; Bill C Penney; Feng Li; Mark K Ferguson; Cassie A Simon; Tianming Wu; Haiyan Liu; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Relationship between Overall Survival of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Burden Seen on Postsurgical Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Images.

Authors:  Chenpeng Zhang; Chuanhong Liao; Bill C Penney; Daniel E Appelbaum; Cassie A Simon; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prognostic value of tumoral heterogeneity and volumetric parameters as measured by F18-FDG PET/CT in sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Bum Soo Kim; Kyoungjune Pak; Keun-Ik Yi; In Joo Kim; Hwan-Jung Roh; Kyu-Sup Cho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Emerging Mechanisms and Treatment Progress on Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Wubin Zheng; Fan Wu; Kai Fu; Guangshun Sun; Guoqiang Sun; Xiao Li; Wei Jiang; Hongyong Cao; Hanjin Wang; Weiwei Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  18F-FDG PET as novel imaging biomarker for disease progression after ablation therapy in colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  M Samim; W Prevoo; B J de Wit-van der Veen; K F Kuhlmann; T Ruers; R van Hillegersberg; M A A J van den Bosch; H M Verkooijen; M G E H Lam; M P M Stokkel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Prognostic significance of (18)FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Xia; Jianjun Liu; Cheng Wu; Shaoli Song; Linjun Tong; Gang Huang; Yuanbo Feng; Yansheng Jiang; Yewei Liu; Ting Yin; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  From genotype to functional phenotype: unraveling the metabolomic features of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Oliver F Bathe; Farshad Farshidfar
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.