Literature DB >> 27921276

Relationship between physician-adjudicated adverse events and patient-reported health-related quality of life in a phase II clinical trial (NCT01143402) of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

Thomas M Atkinson1, Jennifer L Hay2, Alexander Shoushtari2, Yuelin Li2, Daniel J Paucar3, Sloane C Smith2, Ragini R Kudchadkar4, Austin Doyle5, Jeffrey A Sosman6, Jorge Fernando Quevedo7, Mohammed M Milhem8, Anthony M Joshua9, Gerald P Linette10, Thomas F Gajewski11, Jose Lutzky12, David H Lawson4, Christopher D Lao13, Patrick J Flynn14, Mark R Albertini15, Takami Sato16, Karl Lewis17, Brian Marr2, David H Abramson2, Mark Andrew Dickson2, Gary K Schwartz18, Richard D Carvajal18.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical trials commonly use physician-adjudicated adverse event (AE) assessment via the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) for decision-making. Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data are becoming more frequent in oncology; however, the relationship between physician-adjudicated AE assessment and HRQoL is understudied.
METHODS: Data from a phase II trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01143402) where patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were randomized to receive selumetinib, an oral MEK inhibitor, or chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients reported HRQoL at baseline, after 1 month, and end of treatment (n = 118), whereas physicians adjudicated AEs via CTCAE. Mean HRQoL scores were compared between patient randomization arms, as well as between those patients who did/did not receive dose modifications.
RESULTS: Ninety-four percent had a CTCAE grade ≥1 for at least one treatment-associated AE, with 18% undergoing dose modification due to toxicity. Mean HRQoL scores did not significantly differ at each of the three time points. Patient and physician-adjudicated reports of nausea were significantly correlated at the start (r = 0.31, p < 0.01) and end of treatment (r = 0.42, p < 0.05). There were no significant correlations between need for dose modification and HRQoL scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high rate of physician-adjudicated AEs and need for dose modifications with selumetinib, patient-reported HRQoL was not impacted by treatment. Since HRQoL did not differ in the subgroup of patients who received dosage reductions due to AEs, patients may be willing to tolerate select AEs without dose modification (if medically appropriate). More research is needed to determine how to best integrate HRQoL data into clinical trial conduct.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Clinical trials; Neoplasms; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Selumetinib; Uveal melanoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27921276      PMCID: PMC5303646          DOI: 10.1007/s00432-016-2318-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  24 in total

1.  PRO-cision Medicine: Personalizing Patient Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Claire F Snyder
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Comparison of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy with vemurafenib monotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous BRAF Val600-mutation-positive melanoma (COMBI-v): results of a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial.

Authors:  Jean Jacques Grob; Mayur M Amonkar; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Jacob Schachter; Reinhard Dummer; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Kamil Drucis; Florent Grange; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Piotr Rutkowski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Evgeny Levchenko; Pascal Wolter; Axel Hauschild; Georgina V Long; Paul Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Keith Flaherty; Peng Sun; Jeffrey J Legos; Diane Opatt McDowell; Bijoyesh Mookerjee; Dirk Schadendorf; Caroline Robert
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Quality of methods for assessing and reporting serious adverse events in clinical trials of cancer drugs.

Authors:  S M Belknap; C H Georgopoulos; D P West; P R Yarnold; W N Kelly
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of toxicity of anticancer treatments.

Authors:  Massimo Di Maio; Ethan Basch; Jane Bryce; Francesco Perrone
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Issues and challenges with integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials supported by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials networks.

Authors:  Deborah Watkins Bruner; Charlene J Bryan; Neil Aaronson; C Craig Blackmore; Michael Brundage; David Cella; Patricia A Ganz; Carolyn Gotay; Pamela S Hinds; Alice B Kornblith; Benjamin Movsas; Jeff Sloan; Lari Wenzel; Giles Whalen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Thomas M Atkinson; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Tito R Mendoza; Gordon Willis; Lori M Minasian; Steven B Clauser; Andrea Denicoff; Ann O'Mara; Alice Chen; Antonia V Bennett; Diane B Paul; Joshua Gagne; Lauren Rogak; Laura Sit; Vish Viswanath; Deborah Schrag; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Sean J Ryan; Antonia V Bennett; Angela M Stover; Rebecca M Saracino; Lauren J Rogak; Sarah T Jewell; Konstantina Matsoukas; Yuelin Li; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Clifford A Hudis; Paul Sabbatini; Lauren Rogak; Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Thomas M Atkinson; Joanne F Chou; Dorothy Dulko; Laura Sit; Allison Barz; Paul Novotny; Michael Fruscione; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment.

Authors:  Ethan Basch
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 13.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.