Literature DB >> 23868457

Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Jennifer L Hay1, Thomas M Atkinson, Bryce B Reeve, Sandra A Mitchell, Tito R Mendoza, Gordon Willis, Lori M Minasian, Steven B Clauser, Andrea Denicoff, Ann O'Mara, Alice Chen, Antonia V Bennett, Diane B Paul, Joshua Gagne, Lauren Rogak, Laura Sit, Vish Viswanath, Deborah Schrag, Ethan Basch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a library of question items that enables patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. This study contributes content validity evidence of the PRO-CTCAE by incorporating cancer patient input of the relevance and comprehensiveness of the item library.
METHODS: Cognitive interviews were conducted among patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy at multiple sites to evaluate comprehension, memory retrieval, judgment, and response mapping related to AE terms (e.g., nausea), attribute terms (regarding frequency, severity, or interference), response options, and recall period. Three interview rounds were conducted with ≥20 patients completing each item per round. Items were modified and retested if ≥3 patients exhibited cognitive difficulties or if experienced by ≤25% patients.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients participated (35% ≤high school, 28% non-white, and 59% female). Most AE terms (63/80) generated no cognitive difficulties. The remaining 17 were modified without further difficulties by Round 3. Terms were comprehended regardless of education level. Attribute terms and response options required no modifications. Patient adherence to recall period (7 days) was improved when the reference period was incorporated.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence confirming comprehension of the US English language versions of items in the PRO-CTCAE library for measuring symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective within the context of cancer treatment. Several minor changes were made to the items to improve item clarity, comprehension, and ease of response judgment. This study helps to establish the content validity of PRO-CTCAE items for patient reporting of AEs during cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868457      PMCID: PMC3896507          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0470-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  36 in total

1.  Conducting cognitive interviews to understand question-response limitations.

Authors:  Kristen Miller
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Laurie B Burke; Chad J Gwaltney; Nancy Kline Leidy; Mona L Martin; Elizabeth Molsen; Lena Ring
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Patient self-reports of symptoms and clinician ratings as predictors of overall cancer survival.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; John Maringwa; Carolyn C Gotay; Francesca Martinelli; Corneel Coens; Bryce B Reeve; Henning Flechtner; Eva Greimel; Madeleine King; David Osoba; Charles Cleeland; Jolie Ringash; Joseph Schmucker-Von Koch; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joachim Weis; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Electronic toxicity monitoring and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan M Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Stephen B Clauser; Lori Minasian; Laura Sit; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Lauren Rogak; Emily Blauel; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah Bruner
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Toxicity and quality of life outcomes in ovarian cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Elfriede R Greimel; Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Jacobus Pfisterer; Felix Hilpert; Fedor Daghofer; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Electronic symptom reporting by patients: a literature review.

Authors:  Monika A Johansen; Eva Henriksen; Gro Berntsen; Alexander Horsch
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011

8.  Capturing acute toxicity data during lung radiotherapy by using a patient-reported assessment tool.

Authors:  Brooke Tang; Meredith Giuliani; Lisa W Le; Jane Higgins; Andrea Bezjak; Anthony Brade; B C John Cho; Alexander Sun; Andrew J Hope
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 9.  Cancer symptom assessment instruments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jordanka Kirkova; Mellar P Davis; Declan Walsh; Eoin Tiernan; Norma O'Leary; Susan B LeGrand; Ruth L Lagman; K Mitchell Russell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Integrating cancer survivors' experiences into UK cancer registries: design and development of the ePOCS system (electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors).

Authors:  L Ashley; H Jones; J Thomas; D Forman; A Newsham; E Morris; O Johnson; G Velikova; P Wright
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  The level of association between functional performance status measures and patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Charissa F Andreotti; Kailey E Roberts; Rebecca M Saracino; Marisol Hernandez; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Amylou C Dueck; Tito R Mendoza; Sandra A Mitchell; Bryce B Reeve; Kathleen M Castro; Lauren J Rogak; Thomas M Atkinson; Antonia V Bennett; Andrea M Denicoff; Ann M O'Mara; Yuelin Li; Steven B Clauser; Donna M Bryant; James D Bearden; Theresa A Gillis; Jay K Harness; Robert D Siegel; Diane B Paul; Charles S Cleeland; Deborah Schrag; Jeff A Sloan; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah W Bruner; Lori M Minasian; Ethan Basch
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Pilot randomized trial of an electronic symptom monitoring and reporting intervention for hospitalized adults undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Ashley Leak Bryant; Erin Coffman; Brett Phillips; Xianming Tan; Elizabeth Bullard; Rachel Hirschey; Joshua Bradley; Antonia V Bennett; Angela M Stover; Lixin Song; Thomas C Shea; William A Wood
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Assessment of Adverse Events From the Patient Perspective in a Phase 3 Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amylou C Dueck; Howard I Scher; Antonia V Bennett; Gina L Mazza; Gita Thanarajasingam; Gisela Schwab; Aaron L Weitzman; Lauren J Rogak; Ethan Basch
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Assessment of EVAR Complications using CIRSE Complication Classification System in the UK Tertiary Referral Centre: A ∼6-Year Retrospective Analysis (2014-2019).

Authors:  Davide Castiglione; Akshay Easwaran; Akash Prashar; Ludovico La Grutta; Miltiadis Krokidis; Nadeem Shaida
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  [Effect of bevacizumab in treatment of children with optic pathway glioma].

Authors:  Wan-Shui Wu; Jing-Jing Liu; Yan-Ling Sun; Shu-Xu DU; Chun-De Li; Miao Li; Si-Qi Ren; Jin Zhang; Xiao-Jun Gong; Li-Ming Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12

7.  Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Steven B Clauser; Lori M Minasian; Amylou C Dueck; Tito R Mendoza; Jennifer Hay; Thomas M Atkinson; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah W Bruner; Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Andrea Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Ann M O'Mara; Alice Chen; Joseph Kelaghan; Antonia V Bennett; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Allison Barz; Diane B Paul; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Relationship between physician-adjudicated adverse events and patient-reported health-related quality of life in a phase II clinical trial (NCT01143402) of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Jennifer L Hay; Alexander Shoushtari; Yuelin Li; Daniel J Paucar; Sloane C Smith; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Austin Doyle; Jeffrey A Sosman; Jorge Fernando Quevedo; Mohammed M Milhem; Anthony M Joshua; Gerald P Linette; Thomas F Gajewski; Jose Lutzky; David H Lawson; Christopher D Lao; Patrick J Flynn; Mark R Albertini; Takami Sato; Karl Lewis; Brian Marr; David H Abramson; Mark Andrew Dickson; Gary K Schwartz; Richard D Carvajal
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Cognitive Interview-Based Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Adolescents with Cancer.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Molly McFatrich; Laura C Pinheiro; David R Freyer; Ethan M Basch; Justin N Baker; Janice S Withycombe; Lillian Sung; Jennifer W Mack; Mia K Waldron; Catriona Mowbray; Diana Palma; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Bryce B Reeve; Ethan M Basch; Sandra A Mitchell; Mathew Meeneghan; Claudio L Battaglini; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Brett Phillips; Thomas C Shea; William A Wood
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.