Literature DB >> 27921075

Longitudinal monitoring of reconstructed activity concentration on a clinical time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Lawrence R MacDonald1, Amy E Perkins2, Chi-Hua Tung2.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) images are potential quantitative biomarkers. Understanding long-term (months/years) biomarker variability is important for establishing confidence intervals on studies using such biomarkers over these time frames. PET biomarkers are derived from activity concentration ([Formula: see text]) extracted from PET images. Over 30 months, we measured the stability of decay-normalized counts ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] by scanning the same 4.5-cm-diameter Ge-68 cylinder weekly, the same Na-22 point source daily, and a refilled 20-cm F-18 cylinder phantom monthly on a clinical TOF-PET/CT scanner. Longitudinal and adjacent-measurement variability was characterized. We found no drift in [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] for properly calibrated images over 24 months. During this time, [Formula: see text] ranged [Formula: see text] to 6% for count-matched Ge-68 and F-18 images, with coefficient of variation (COV) across time of 2.3% (Ge-68, 81 scans) and 3.2% (F-18, 24 scans). At typical patient image count levels the Ge-68 [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) COV across time was 6.9% (9.6%). Changes in [Formula: see text] between adjacent F-18 scans ([Formula: see text]) ranged between [Formula: see text], with corresponding date-matched changes in Ge-68 [Formula: see text] ranging [Formula: see text]. We recommend (1) tracking trends in [Formula: see text] with image [Formula: see text] as a check of quantitative data corrections/calibrations and (2) tracking both mean and COV of [Formula: see text] (single time point measures) to hundredths precision using standardized uptake values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; SUV variance; quality control procedure; quantitative imaging biomarker; quantitative imaging biomarker alliance

Year:  2016        PMID: 27921075      PMCID: PMC5120216          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.011004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  16 in total

1.  Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Mehmet Kocak; Harold Thurston; Tina Young Poussaint
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.

Authors:  R K Doot; J S Scheuermann; P E Christian; J S Karp; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Virginie Frings; Adrianus J de Langen; Egbert F Smit; Floris H P van Velden; Otto S Hoekstra; Harm van Tinteren; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a multicenter phase I study of patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Linda M Velasquez; Ronald Boellaard; Georgia Kollia; Wendy Hayes; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Susan M Galbraith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Development of a traceable calibration methodology for solid (68)Ge/(68)Ga sources used as a calibration surrogate for (18)F in radionuclide activity calibrators.

Authors:  Brian E Zimmerman; Jeffrey T Cessna
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael M Graham; Richard L Wahl; John M Hoffman; Jeffrey T Yap; John J Sunderland; Ronald Boellaard; Eric S Perlman; Paul E Kinahan; Paul E Christian; Otto S Hoekstra; Gary S Dorfman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  A Digital Reference Object to Analyze Calculation Accuracy of PET Standardized Uptake Value.

Authors:  Larry A Pierce; Brian F Elston; David A Clunie; Dennis Nelson; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Repeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET.

Authors:  J Schwartz; J L Humm; M Gonen; H Kalaigian; H Schoder; S M Larson; S A Nehmeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Biases in Multicenter Longitudinal PET Standardized Uptake Value Measurements.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Larry A Pierce; Darrin Byrd; Brian Elston; Keith C Allberg; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  PET/CT Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor Change Measurement, Truth Data, and Error.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Michelle Wanner-Roybal; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

View more
  1 in total

1.  Q-Bot: automatic DICOM metadata monitoring for the next level of quality management in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Ferenc Nagy; Aron K Krizsan; Kornél Kukuts; Melinda Szolikova; Zsolt Hascsi; Sandor Barna; Antonietta Acs; Peter Szabo; Lajos Tron; Laszlo Balkay; Magnus Dahlbom; Mihaly Zentai; Attila Forgacs; Ildiko Garai
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-03-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.