Literature DB >> 27921071

Validation of automatic joint space width measurements in hand radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis.

Olga Schenk1, Yinghe Huo2, Koen L Vincken3, Mart A van de Laar4, Ina H H Kuper4, Kees C H Slump1, Floris P J G Lafeber5, Hein J Bernelot Moens6.   

Abstract

Computerized methods promise quick, objective, and sensitive tools to quantify progression of radiological damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Measurement of joint space width (JSW) in finger and wrist joints with these systems performed comparable to the Sharp-van der Heijde score (SHS). A next step toward clinical use, validation of precision and accuracy in hand joints with minimal damage, is described with a close scrutiny of sources of error. A recently developed system to measure metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints was validated in consecutive hand images of RA patients. To assess the impact of image acquisition, measurements on radiographs from a multicenter trial and from a recent prospective cohort in a single hospital were compared. Precision of the system was tested by comparing the joint space in mm in pairs of subsequent images with a short interval without progression of SHS. In case of incorrect measurements, the source of error was analyzed with a review by human experts. Accuracy was assessed by comparison with reported measurements with other systems. In the two series of radiographs, the system could automatically locate and measure 1003/1088 (92.2%) and 1143/1200 (95.3%) individual joints, respectively. In joints with a normal SHS, the average (SD) size of MCP joints was [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the two series of radiographs, and of PIP joints [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The difference in JSW between two serial radiographs with an interval of 6 to 12 months and unchanged SHS was [Formula: see text], indicating very good precision. Errors occurred more often in radiographs from the multicenter cohort than in a more recent series from a single hospital. Detailed analysis of the 55/1125 (4.9%) measurements that had a discrepant paired measurement revealed that variation in the process of image acquisition (exposure in 15% and repositioning in 57%) was a more frequent source of error than incorrect delineation by the software (25%). Various steps in the validation of an automated measurement system for JSW of MCP and PIP joints are described. The use of serial radiographs from different sources, with a short interval and limited damage, is helpful to detect sources of error. Image acquisition, in particular repositioning, is a dominant source of error.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated measurements; computer assisted measurements; image analysis; rheumatoid arthritis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27921071      PMCID: PMC5120150          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  22 in total

1.  Reliability and sensitivity of joint space measurements in hand radiographs using computerized image analysis.

Authors:  J Angwin; G Heald; A Lloyd; K Howland; M Davy; M F James
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Boers; A C Verhoeven; H M Markusse; M A van de Laar; R Westhovens; J C van Denderen; D van Zeben; B A Dijkmans; A J Peeters; P Jacobs; H R van den Brink; H J Schouten; D M van der Heijde; A Boonen; S van der Linden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Sustained beneficial effects of a protocolized treat-to-target strategy in very early rheumatoid arthritis: three-year results of the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort.

Authors:  M Vermeer; H H Kuper; H J Bernelot Moens; K W Drossaers-Bakker; A E van der Bijl; P L C M van Riel; M A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Radiographic joint space width in the fingers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis of less than one year's duration.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; Jeffrey Duryea; Matthew H Liang; Frederick Wolfe; Axel Finckh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-05

5.  Further Simplification of the Simple Erosion Narrowing Score With Item Response Theory Methodology.

Authors:  Martijn A H Oude Voshaar; Olga Schenk; Peter M Ten Klooster; Harald E Vonkeman; Hein J Bernelot Moens; Maarten Boers; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Quantitative microfocal radiography accurately detects joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright; I Carmichael; S R Walker
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Patient repositioning reproducibility of joint space width measurements on hand radiographs.

Authors:  Gesa Neumann; Paola dePablo; Axel Finckh; Lori B Chibnik; Fred Wolfe; Jeffrey Duryea
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  The usefulness of computer-aided joint space analysis in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Diane M Renz; Andreas Hansch; Franz Kainberger; Gabriele Lehmann; Ansgar Malich; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Radiographic hand joint space width assessed by computer is a sensitive measure of change in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jane Angwin; Andrew Lloyd; Geoff Heald; Gerald Nepom; Michael Binks; Michael F James
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Computer-aided joint space analysis of the metacarpal-phalangeal and proximal-interphalangeal finger joint: normative age-related and gender-specific data.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Joachim Böttcher; Bettina E Seidl; Jens-Peter Heyne; Alexander Petrovitch; Torsten Eidner; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Gunter Wolf; Gert Hein; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantification of Joint Space Width Difference on Radiography Via Phase-Only Correlation (POC) Analysis: a Phantom Study Comparing with Various Tomographical Modalities Using Conventional Margin-Contouring.

Authors:  Aimi Taguchi; Shun Shishido; Yafei Ou; Masayuki Ikebe; Tianyu Zeng; Wanxuan Fang; Koichi Murakami; Toshikazu Ueda; Nobutoshi Yasojima; Keitaro Sato; Kenichi Tamura; Kenneth Sutherland; Nozomi Oki; Ko Chiba; Kazuyuki Minowa; Masataka Uetani; Tamotsu Kamishima
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Fully automated joint space width measurement and digital X-ray radiogrammetry in early RA.

Authors:  Michael Platten; Yogan Kisten; Johan Kälvesten; Laurent Arnaud; Kristina Forslind; Ronald van Vollenhoven
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2017-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.