Literature DB >> 9251634

Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis.

M Boers1, A C Verhoeven, H M Markusse, M A van de Laar, R Westhovens, J C van Denderen, D van Zeben, B A Dijkmans, A J Peeters, P Jacobs, H R van den Brink, H J Schouten, D M van der Heijde, A Boonen, S van der Linden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of intensive combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis is unproven. In a multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial (COBRA), we compared the combination of sulphasalazine (2 g/day), methotrexate (7.5 mg/week), and prednisolone (initially 60 mg/day, tapered in 6 weekly steps to 7.5 mg/day) with sulphasalazine alone.
METHODS: 155 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (median duration 4 months) were randomly assigned combined treatment (76) or sulphasalazine alone (79). Prednisolone and methotrexate were tapered and stopped after 28 and 40 weeks, respectively. The main outcomes were the pooled index (a weighted change score of five disease activity measures) and the Sharp/Van der Heijde radiographic damage score in hands and feet. Independent health-care professionals assessed the main outcomes without knowledge of treatment allocation.
FINDINGS: At week 28, the mean pooled index was 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.6) in the combined treatment group and 0.8 (0.6-1.0) in the sulphasalazine group (p < 0.0001). At this time, 55 (72%) and 39 (49%) patients, respectively, were improved according to American College of Rheumatology criteria. The clinical difference between the groups decreased and was no longer significant after prednisolone was stopped, and there were no further changes after methotrexate was stopped. At 28 weeks, the radiographic damage score had increased by a median of 1 (range 0-28) in the combined-therapy group and 4 (0-44) in the sulphasalazine group (p < 0.0001). The increases at week 56 (2 [0-43] vs 6 [0-54], p = 0.004), and at week 80 (4 [0-80] vs 12 [0-72], p = 0.01) were also significant. Further analysis suggests that combined therapy immediately suppressed damage progression, whereas sulphasalazine did so less effectively and with a lag of 6 to 12 months. There were fewer withdrawals in the combined therapy than the sulphasalazine group (6 [8%] vs 23 [29%]), and they occurred later.
INTERPRETATION: This combined-therapy regimen offers additional disease control over and above that of sulphasalazine alone that persists for up to a year after corticosteroids are stopped. Although confirmatory studies and long-term follow-up are needed, this approach may prove useful in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9251634     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01300-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  209 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a review of recent clinical trials.

Authors:  T Mikuls; L Moreland
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Recent advances: rheumatology.

Authors:  R Madhok; H Kerr; H A Capell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

Review 3.  Update in internal medicine.

Authors:  F López-Jiménez; M Brito; Y W Aude; P Scheinberg; M Kaplan; D A Dixon; N Schneiderman; J F Trejo; L H López-Salazar; E J Ramírez-Barba; R Kalil; C Ortiz; J Goyos; A Buenaño; S Kottiech; G A Lamas
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 4.  Combination treatment in autoimmune diseases. Methodology of combination trials.

Authors:  M Boers
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S Bingham; P Emery
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2001

6.  Newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M H Weisman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: does it reflect outcome? Does it reflect treatment?

Authors:  D van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial. On behalf of the Rheumatic Research Foundation Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Jaarsveld; J W Jacobs; M J van der Veen; A A Blaauw; A A Kruize; D M Hofman; H L Brus; G A van Albada-Kuipers; A H Heurkens; E J ter Borg; H C Haanen; C van Booma-Frankfort; Y Schenk; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Efficacy, tolerability and cost effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Michael T Nurmohamed; Ben A C Dijkmans
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  [Disease-modifying effects of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  F Buttgereit; G Burmester; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.