| Literature DB >> 27919891 |
Kenneth D James1, Christopher P Laudeman2, Navdeep B Malkar2, Radha Krishnan2, Karen Polowy2.
Abstract
Echinocandins are a first-line therapy for candidemia and invasive candidiasis. They are generally safe with few drug interactions, but the stability and pharmacokinetic properties of currently approved echinocandins are such that each was developed for daily intravenous infusion. We sought to discover a novel echinocandin with properties that would enable more flexible dosing regimens, alternate routes of delivery, and expanded utility. Derivatives of known echinocandin scaffolds were generated, and an iterative process of design and screening led to the discovery of CD101, a novel echinocandin that has since demonstrated improved chemical stability and pharmacokinetics. Here, we report the structure-activity relationships (including preclinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic data) for the series of echinocandin analogs from which CD101 was selected. In a mouse model of disseminated candidiasis, the test compounds displayed clear dose responses and were generally associated with lower fungal burdens than that of anidulafungin. Single-dose pharmacokinetic studies in beagle dogs revealed a wide disparity in the half-lives and volumes of distribution, with one compound (now known as CD101) displaying a half-life that is nearly 5-fold longer than that of anidulafungin (53.1 h versus 11.6 h, respectively). In vitro activity data against panels of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. demonstrated that CD101 behaved similarly to approved echinocandins in terms of potency and spectrum of activity, suggesting that the improved efficacy observed in vivo for CD101 is a result of features beyond the antifungal potency inherent to the molecule. Factors that potentially contribute to the improved in vivo efficacy of CD101 are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Candida; antifungal agents; antimicrobial agents; echinocandin; pharmacokinetics; pharmacology; structure-activity relationships
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27919891 PMCID: PMC5278707 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01541-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Structure of CD101 acetate.
FIG 2Structures of select echinocandin analogues and the derivatives described in these studies. Four of the compounds (compounds 1 to 4) are hemiaminal ethers; the other two (compounds 5 to 6) are aminals. Although they are structurally similar and nearly identical in molecular weight, the half-lives observed for these compounds varied greatly. Compound 1 (CD101) was selected for further characterization and development.
FIG 3Fungal burdens in the kidneys of mice after infection with C. albicans. The black bars indicate fungal burden of infected, untreated controls at the time the treatment cohorts received test article (2 h) and at the time treatment cohorts were sacrificed (24 h after infection). All test articles displayed a good dose response. Fungal counts below the limit of detection (LOD) are reported at the LOD, indicated by the dashed red line. Anid, anidulafungin; NA, not available; *, P < 0.01.
Half-lives and volumes of distribution for anidulafungin and select test articles after i.v. administration (10-min slow bolus) in beagle dogs
| Test article | ||
|---|---|---|
| Anidulafungin | 11.6 | 779 |
| CD101 | 53.1 | 1,360 |
| 2 | 18.9 | 331 |
| 3 | 33.7 | 627 |
| 4 | 28.9 | 361 |
| 5 | 21 | 687 |
| 6 | 27.6 | 874 |
FIG 4Plasma concentration-time curves for CD101 and anidulafungin in beagle dogs. Four nonnaive dogs received a single dose (1.4 mg/kg) of either CD101 (blue triangle) or anidulafungin (black circle) in a crossover fashion. Each point on the graph is an average from four animals plus or minus the standard error of the mean (SEM).
MICs of CD101 and compound 6 with echinocandin and polyene comparators against Candida spp.
| Organism | Time (h) | MIC (μg/ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anid | Caspo | CD101 | 6 | AmpB | ||
| 24 | ≤0.015 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ≤0.06 | |
| 48 | ≤0.015 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.125 | |
| 24 | 0.03 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | |
| 48 | 0.03 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.25 | |
| 24 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ≤0.06 | |
| 48 | 2 | >16 | 2 | 1 | ≤0.06 | |
| 24 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.25 | |
| 48 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.5 | |
| 24 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ≤0.06 | |
| 48 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | ≤0.06 | |
| 24 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| 48 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| 24 | ≤0.015 | 0.06 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | 0.25 | |
| 48 | ≤0.015 | 0.06 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | 0.25 | |
AmpB, amphotericin B; Anid, anidulafungin; Caspo, caspofungin.
Reduced growth occurred, but the CLSI endpoint was not achieved.
Minimum effective concentrations and MICs of CD101 and compound 6 with echinocandin and polyene comparators against Aspergillus spp.
| Organism | Anid MEC (μg/ml) | Caspo MEC (μg/ml) | CD101 MEC (μg/ml) | Compound 6 MEC (μg/ml) | AmpB MIC (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.06 | |
| ≤0.015 | 0.125 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ≤0.06 | |
| ≤0.015 | 0.06 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | 1 | |
| ≤0.015 | 0.125 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | 1 | |
| ≤0.015 | 0.06 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | 0.125 | |
| 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 2 | |
| ≤0.015 | 0.125 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | 1 |
Results for this organism were read at 68 h.