Literature DB >> 27919068

Capturing pairwise and multi-way chromosomal conformations using chromosomal walks.

Pedro Olivares-Chauvet1, Zohar Mukamel1, Aviezer Lifshitz1, Omer Schwartzman1, Noa Oded Elkayam1, Yaniv Lubling1, Gintaras Deikus2, Robert P Sebra2, Amos Tanay1.   

Abstract

Chromosomes are folded into highly compacted structures to accommodate physical constraints within nuclei and to regulate access to genomic information. Recently, global mapping of pairwise contacts showed that loops anchoring topological domains (TADs) are highly conserved between cell types and species. Whether pairwise loops synergize to form higher-order structures is still unclear. Here we develop a conformation capture assay to study higher-order organization using chromosomal walks (C-walks) that link multiple genomic loci together into proximity chains in human and mouse cells. This approach captures chromosomal structure at varying scales. Inter-chromosomal contacts constitute only 7-10% of the pairs and are restricted by interfacing TADs. About half of the C-walks stay within one chromosome, and almost half of those are restricted to intra-TAD spaces. C-walks that couple 2-4 TADs indicate stochastic associations between transcriptionally active, early replicating loci. Targeted analysis of thousands of 3-walks anchored at highly expressed genes support pairwise, rather than hub-like, chromosomal topology at active loci. Polycomb-repressed Hox domains are shown by the same approach to enrich for synergistic hubs. Together, the data indicate that chromosomal territories, TADs, and intra-TAD loops are primarily driven by nested, possibly dynamic, pairwise contacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919068     DOI: 10.1038/nature20158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  33 in total

1.  Nanoscale spatial organization of the HoxD gene cluster in distinct transcriptional states.

Authors:  Pierre J Fabre; Alexander Benke; Elisabeth Joye; Thi Hanh Nguyen Huynh; Suliana Manley; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells.

Authors:  Jessica Zuin; Jesse R Dixon; Michael I J A van der Reijden; Zhen Ye; Petros Kolovos; Rutger W W Brouwer; Mariëtte P C van de Corput; Harmen J G van de Werken; Tobias A Knoch; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Frank G Grosveld; Bing Ren; Kerstin S Wendt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs.

Authors:  Guillaume Andrey; Thomas Montavon; Bénédicte Mascrez; Federico Gonzalez; Daan Noordermeer; Marion Leleu; Didier Trono; François Spitz; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes.

Authors:  Adrian L Sanborn; Suhas S P Rao; Su-Chen Huang; Neva C Durand; Miriam H Huntley; Andrew I Jewett; Ivan D Bochkov; Dharmaraj Chinnappan; Ashok Cutkosky; Jian Li; Kristopher P Geeting; Andreas Gnirke; Alexandre Melnikov; Doug McKenna; Elena K Stamenova; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cooperativity, specificity, and evolutionary stability of Polycomb targeting in Drosophila.

Authors:  Bernd Schuettengruber; Noa Oded Elkayam; Tom Sexton; Marianne Entrevan; Shani Stern; Aubin Thomas; Eitan Yaffe; Hugues Parrinello; Amos Tanay; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion.

Authors:  Geoffrey Fudenberg; Maxim Imakaev; Carolyn Lu; Anton Goloborodko; Nezar Abdennur; Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Polycomb silencing: from linear chromatin domains to 3D chromosome folding.

Authors:  Thierry Cheutin; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  Identifying multi-locus chromatin contacts in human cells using tethered multiple 3C.

Authors:  Ferhat Ay; Thanh H Vu; Michael J Zeitz; Nelle Varoquaux; Jan E Carette; Jean-Philippe Vert; Andrew R Hoffman; William S Noble
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation.

Authors:  Takashi Nagano; Csilla Várnai; Stefan Schoenfelder; Biola-Maria Javierre; Steven W Wingett; Peter Fraser
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  40 in total

1.  Higher-Order Inter-chromosomal Hubs Shape 3D Genome Organization in the Nucleus.

Authors:  Sofia A Quinodoz; Noah Ollikainen; Barbara Tabak; Ali Palla; Jan Marten Schmidt; Elizabeth Detmar; Mason M Lai; Alexander A Shishkin; Prashant Bhat; Yodai Takei; Vickie Trinh; Erik Aznauryan; Pamela Russell; Christine Cheng; Marko Jovanovic; Amy Chow; Long Cai; Patrick McDonel; Manuel Garber; Mitchell Guttman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Chromosome Conformation Capture and Beyond: Toward an Integrative View of Chromosome Structure and Function.

Authors:  Rachel Patton McCord; Noam Kaplan; Luca Giorgetti
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Computational methods for analyzing and modeling genome structure and organization.

Authors:  Dejun Lin; Giancarlo Bonora; Galip Gürkan Yardımcı; William S Noble
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2018-07-18

4.  Modelling genome-wide topological associating domains in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Y Zhan; L Giorgetti; G Tiana
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Extensive Heterogeneity and Intrinsic Variation in Spatial Genome Organization.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Finn; Gianluca Pegoraro; Hugo B Brandão; Anne-Laure Valton; Marlies E Oomen; Job Dekker; Leonid Mirny; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  KLF4 is involved in the organization and regulation of pluripotency-associated three-dimensional enhancer networks.

Authors:  Dafne Campigli Di Giammartino; Andreas Kloetgen; Alexander Polyzos; Yiyuan Liu; Daleum Kim; Dylan Murphy; Abderhman Abuhashem; Paola Cavaliere; Boaz Aronson; Veevek Shah; Noah Dephoure; Matthias Stadtfeld; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Effie Apostolou
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Regulation of neuronal commitment in mouse embryonic stem cells by the Reno1/Bahcc1 locus.

Authors:  Hadas Hezroni; Rotem Ben-Tov Perry; Noa Gil; Neta Degani; Igor Ulitsky
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Contact Mapping to Unravel Chromosome Folding.

Authors:  Tiffany Ge; Celeste D Rosencrance; Kyle P Eagen
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 9.  Understanding the 3D genome: Emerging impacts on human disease.

Authors:  Anton Krumm; Zhijun Duan
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 7.727

10.  Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells.

Authors:  Bogdan Bintu; Leslie J Mateo; Jun-Han Su; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Mirae Parker; Seon Kinrot; Kei Yamaya; Alistair N Boettiger; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.