K S Kendler1, H Ohlsson2, K J Karriker-Jaffe3, J Sundquist2, K Sundquist2. 1. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond, VA,USA. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University,Malmö,Sweden. 3. Alcohol Research Group,Public Health Institute,Emeryville,CA,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with future risk for psychosocial dysfunction, the degree to which this arises from a direct causal effect of AUD on functioning v. from correlated risk factors (also known as confounders) is less clearly established. METHOD: AUD was assessed from Swedish medical, criminal and pharmacy registries. In a large general population cohort, using Cox proportional hazard and regression models, we predicted from the onset of AUD four outcomes: early retirement, unemployment, social assistance, and individual income. We then examined the degree to which these associations were attenuated by relevant confounders as well as by the use of discordant cousin, half-sibling, full-sibling, and monozygotic twin pairs. RESULTS: In males, AUD most strongly predicted social assistance [hazard ratio (HR) 8.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.96-8.59], followed by early retirement (HR 5.63, 95% CI 5.53-5.72) and unemployment (HR 2.75, 95% CI 2.65-2.85). For income at age 50, AUD was associated with a decrease in income of 0.24 s.d.s (95% CI -0.25 to -0.23). Results were similar in females. Modest to moderate attenuation of these associations was seen in both sexes after the addition of relevant covariates. These associations were reduced but remained robust in discordant co-relative pairs, including monozygotic twins. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that AUD has a causal impact on a range of measures reflective of psychosocial dysfunction. These findings provide strong support for the drift hypothesis. However, some of the associations between AUD and dysfunction appear to be non-causal and result from shared risk factors, many of which are likely familial.
BACKGROUND: Although alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with future risk for psychosocial dysfunction, the degree to which this arises from a direct causal effect of AUD on functioning v. from correlated risk factors (also known as confounders) is less clearly established. METHOD: AUD was assessed from Swedish medical, criminal and pharmacy registries. In a large general population cohort, using Cox proportional hazard and regression models, we predicted from the onset of AUD four outcomes: early retirement, unemployment, social assistance, and individual income. We then examined the degree to which these associations were attenuated by relevant confounders as well as by the use of discordant cousin, half-sibling, full-sibling, and monozygotic twin pairs. RESULTS: In males, AUD most strongly predicted social assistance [hazard ratio (HR) 8.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.96-8.59], followed by early retirement (HR 5.63, 95% CI 5.53-5.72) and unemployment (HR 2.75, 95% CI 2.65-2.85). For income at age 50, AUD was associated with a decrease in income of 0.24 s.d.s (95% CI -0.25 to -0.23). Results were similar in females. Modest to moderate attenuation of these associations was seen in both sexes after the addition of relevant covariates. These associations were reduced but remained robust in discordant co-relative pairs, including monozygotic twins. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that AUD has a causal impact on a range of measures reflective of psychosocial dysfunction. These findings provide strong support for the drift hypothesis. However, some of the associations between AUD and dysfunction appear to be non-causal and result from shared risk factors, many of which are likely familial.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol use disorder; co-relative design; drift; early retirement; income; social assistance; unemployment
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Risë B Goldstein; Tulshi D Saha; S Patricia Chou; Jeesun Jung; Haitao Zhang; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Jack Tsai; Robert A Rosenheck; Wesley J Kasprow; James F McGuire Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Anne Buu; MaryAnn Mansour; Jing Wang; Susan K Refior; Hiram E Fitzgerald; Robert A Zucker Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Jill Alexandra Rabinowitz; Rashelle Musci; Adam Milam; Kelly Benke; Danielle Sisto; Nicholas S Ialongo; Brion S Maher; George Uhl; Gail Rosenbaum; Beth Reboussin Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Henrik Ohlsson; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Henrik Ohlsson; Abigail A Fagan; Paul Lichtenstein; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Simon B Goldberg; Tracy L Simpson; Keren Lehavot; Jodie G Katon; Jessica A Chen; Joseph E Glass; Paula P Schnurr; Nina A Sayer; John C Fortney Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Henrik Ohlsson; Kenneth S Kendler; Won Kim Cook; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Jill A Rabinowitz; Adrian I Campos; Jue-Sheng Ong; Luis M García-Marín; Sarael Alcauter; Brittany L Mitchell; Katrina L Grasby; Gabriel Cuéllar-Partida; Nathan A Gillespie; Andrew S Huhn; Nicholas G Martin; Paul M Thompson; Sarah E Medland; Brion S Maher; Miguel E Rentería Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: J C Stagnaro; A H Cia; H Vommaro; S Sustas; N Vázquez; E Serfaty; R C Kessler; C Benjet Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 6.892