Kenneth S Kendler1, Jianguang Ji2, Alexis C Edwards3, Henrik Ohlsson2, Jan Sundquist4, Kristina Sundquist4. 1. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond2Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond3Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richm. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. 3. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond2Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. 4. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden5Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) runs strongly in families. It is unclear to what extent the cross-generational transmission of AUD results from genetic vs environmental factors. OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk for AUD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Follow-up in 8 public data registers of adoptees, their biological and adoptive relatives, and offspring and parents from stepfamilies and not-lived-with families in Sweden. In this cohort study, subtypes of AUD were assessed by latent class analysis. A total of 18,115 adoptees (born 1950-1993) and 171,989 and 107,696 offspring of not-lived-with parents and stepparents, respectively (born 1960-1993). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Alcohol use disorder recorded in medical, legal, or pharmacy registry records. RESULTS: Alcohol use disorder in adoptees was significantly predicted by AUD in biological parents (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.29-1.66) and siblings (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.55-2.44) as well as adoptive parents (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80). Genetic and environmental risk indices created from biological and adoptive relatives acted additively on adoptee AUD liability. Results from biological and adoptive relatives were replicated and extended from examinations of, respectively, not-lived-with parents and stepparents. Multivariate models in these families showed that AUD in offspring was significantly predicted by AUD, drug abuse, psychiatric illness, and crime in not-lived-with parents and by AUD, drug abuse, crime, and premature death in stepparents. Latent class analyses of adoptees and offspring of not-lived-with parents with AUDs revealed 3 AUD classes characterized by (1) female preponderance and high rates of psychiatric illness, (2) mild nonrecurrent symptoms, and (3) early-onset recurrence, drug abuse, and crime. These classes had distinct genetic signatures in the patterns of risk for various disorders in their not-lived-with parents and striking differences in the rates of recorded mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Parent-offspring transmission of AUD results from both genetic and environmental factors. Genetic risk for AUD reflects both a specific liability to AUD and to other externalizing disorders. Environmental risk reflects features of both parental psychopathology and other aspects of the rearing environment. Alcohol use disorder is a heterogeneous syndrome and meaningful subtypes emerged from latent class analysis, which were validated by patterns of disorders in biological parents and specific psychiatric comorbidities. The general population contains informative family constellations that can complement more traditional adoption designs in clarifying the sources of parent-offspring resemblance.
IMPORTANCE: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) runs strongly in families. It is unclear to what extent the cross-generational transmission of AUD results from genetic vs environmental factors. OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk for AUD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Follow-up in 8 public data registers of adoptees, their biological and adoptive relatives, and offspring and parents from stepfamilies and not-lived-with families in Sweden. In this cohort study, subtypes of AUD were assessed by latent class analysis. A total of 18,115 adoptees (born 1950-1993) and 171,989 and 107,696 offspring of not-lived-with parents and stepparents, respectively (born 1960-1993). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Alcohol use disorder recorded in medical, legal, or pharmacy registry records. RESULTS:Alcohol use disorder in adoptees was significantly predicted by AUD in biological parents (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.29-1.66) and siblings (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.55-2.44) as well as adoptive parents (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80). Genetic and environmental risk indices created from biological and adoptive relatives acted additively on adoptee AUD liability. Results from biological and adoptive relatives were replicated and extended from examinations of, respectively, not-lived-with parents and stepparents. Multivariate models in these families showed that AUD in offspring was significantly predicted by AUD, drug abuse, psychiatric illness, and crime in not-lived-with parents and by AUD, drug abuse, crime, and premature death in stepparents. Latent class analyses of adoptees and offspring of not-lived-with parents with AUDs revealed 3 AUD classes characterized by (1) female preponderance and high rates of psychiatric illness, (2) mild nonrecurrent symptoms, and (3) early-onset recurrence, drug abuse, and crime. These classes had distinct genetic signatures in the patterns of risk for various disorders in their not-lived-with parents and striking differences in the rates of recorded mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Parent-offspring transmission of AUD results from both genetic and environmental factors. Genetic risk for AUD reflects both a specific liability to AUD and to other externalizing disorders. Environmental risk reflects features of both parental psychopathology and other aspects of the rearing environment. Alcohol use disorder is a heterogeneous syndrome and meaningful subtypes emerged from latent class analysis, which were validated by patterns of disorders in biological parents and specific psychiatric comorbidities. The general population contains informative family constellations that can complement more traditional adoption designs in clarifying the sources of parent-offspring resemblance.
Authors: A C Heath; K K Bucholz; P A Madden; S H Dinwiddie; W S Slutske; L J Bierut; D J Statham; M P Dunne; J B Whitfield; N G Martin Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: C E Cutrona; R J Cadoret; J A Suhr; C C Richards; E Troughton; K Schutte; G Woodworth Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 1994 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Sara L Lönn; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Jan Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Sara Larsson Lönn; Jessica E Salvatore; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Kenneth S Kendler; Henrik Ohlsson; Alexis Edwards; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 3.568